IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5103-d547892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational and Safety Management at Intersections: Can the Turbo-Roundabout Be an Effective Alternative to Conventional Solutions?

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Gallelli

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata Campus (CS), 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

  • Giusi Perri

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata Campus (CS), 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

  • Rosolino Vaiana

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata Campus (CS), 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

Abstract

The European Union policy strategies on the sustainability of the transport system pursue the goals of maximizing safety and environmental benefits and reducing the severity and frequency of crashes, congestion, and pollutant emission rates. A common issue is the planning of the most effective solution for operational and safety management at intersections. In this study, an egg turbo roundabout is proposed as the alternative solution to a conventional roundabout in Southern Italy which suffers from traffic congestion. A comparative analysis is carried out using microsimulation techniques to investigate the safety effects and operational improvements of converting a traditional priority intersection into standard roundabout or turbo roundabout layout. In particular, the VISSIM software is used to explore the most relevant operational performance measures: queue length, travel times and delays. The lowest values of these measurements are recorded for the simulated turbo roundabout, thus making this scheme more appropriate in terms of operational performances. With regard to safety analysis, the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) is used to collect information on the predicted number of conflicts, the probability, and severity of the potential collisions. The results suggest that, for the specific case study, the safety levels of the standard roundabout and the turbo roundabout are approximately comparable.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Gallelli & Giusi Perri & Rosolino Vaiana, 2021. "Operational and Safety Management at Intersections: Can the Turbo-Roundabout Be an Effective Alternative to Conventional Solutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5103-:d:547892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Pompigna & Marco Guerrieri & Raffaele Mauro, 2020. "New Extensions and Applications of the Modified Chumanov Model for Calculating Entry Capacity of Single-Lane Roundabouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Vincenzo Gallelli & Rosolino Vaiana, 2019. "Safety Improvements by Converting a Standard Roundabout with Unbalanced Flow Distribution into an Egg Turbo Roundabout: Simulation Approach to a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Luisa Tumminello & Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà, 2024. "Insights into Simulated Smart Mobility on Roundabouts: Achievements, Lessons Learned, and Steps Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-33, May.
    2. Tien-Pen Hsu & Ku-Lin Wen & Taiyi Zhang, 2021. "Applying Machine Learning to Develop Lane Control Principles for Mixed Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Maksymilian Mądziel & Tiziana Campisi & Artur Jaworski & Hubert Kuszewski & Paweł Woś, 2021. "Assessing Vehicle Emissions from a Multi-Lane to Turbo Roundabout Conversion Using a Microsimulation Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanyuan Wu & Feng Zhu, 2021. "Junction Management for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Intersection or Roundabout?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Song, Yang & Hu, Xianbiao & Lu, Jiawei & Zhou, Xuesong, 2022. "Analytical approximation and calibration of roundabout capacity: A merging state transition-based modeling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 232-257.
    3. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    4. Elżbieta Macioszek, 2020. "Roundabout Entry Capacity Calculation—A Case Study Based on Roundabouts in Tokyo, Japan, and Tokyo Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Andreas Keler & Patrick Malcolm & Georgios Grigoropoulos & Seyed Abdollah Hosseini & Heather Kaths & Fritz Busch & Klaus Bogenberger, 2021. "Data-Driven Scenario Specification for AV–VRU Interactions at Urban Roundabouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Alicja Sołowczuk & Stanisław Majer, 2023. "Design Study for the Construction of Turbo Roundabouts under Constrained Site Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Qiujia Liu & Jiali Deng & Yifan Shen & Wenxin Wang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Turbo Roundabout with Simulations Based on the Lujiazui Roundabout in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5103-:d:547892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.