IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3897-d528070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Bacteria and Fungi Respond Differently to Organisms Covering on Leshan Giant Buddha Body

Author

Listed:
  • Xuli Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Manfei Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Fujia Wu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Bo Sun

    (Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Railway Engineering Corporation, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Tianyu Yang

    (Grottoes Research Center, Management Committee of Leshan Grand Buddha Scenic Spot, Leshan 614003, China)

  • Huixing Song

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Soil microbial communities play a key role in the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, in particular through their interaction with above-ground plants and weathering of rocks. In this study, the chemical properties and microbial diversity of soils covered by different organisms on Leshan Giant Buddha body were analyzed. The results showed that the concentration of soil total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) increased significantly with the change of above-ground organisms from lichens to bryophytes and vascular plants. TOC, TN, TP, C:N, and C:P were significantly correlated with the composition of microbial community. Bacterial and fungal diversity responded differently to the change of organisms, and the diversity of bacterial communities changed significantly among different sites. The settlement of Embryogenic plants increased the α-diversity indices including Sobs, Shannon, Ace and Chao indices, which were highest in sites covered with Ferns. The relative abundances of Chloroflexi , Acidobacteria , Nitrospirae and Planctomycetes increased with the order of Bryophyte, Fern, Grass and Shrub, and Cyanobacteria was opposite, with the highest in samples covered with lichens. These results improve understanding of plant–fungi–bacteria interactions during the early stages of soil development, and provide a scientific basis for protection of Leshan Giant Buddha.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuli Chen & Manfei Wang & Fujia Wu & Bo Sun & Tianyu Yang & Huixing Song, 2021. "Soil Bacteria and Fungi Respond Differently to Organisms Covering on Leshan Giant Buddha Body," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3897-:d:528070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuanhong Xu & Wenhua Xiang & Mengmeng Gou & Liang Chen & Pifeng Lei & Xi Fang & Xiangwen Deng & Shuai Ouyang, 2018. "Effects of Forest Restoration on Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Their Stoichiometry in Hunan, Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ye Xiao & Zhigang Huang & Yulin Ling & Shenwen Cai & Boping Zeng & Sheng Liang & Xiao Wang, 2022. "Effects of Forest Vegetation Restoration on Soil Organic Carbon and Its Labile Fractions in the Danxia Landform of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Jun Wang & Wei Dai & Kaikai Fang & Hui Gao & Zhimin Sha & Linkui Cao, 2022. "Nutrient Characterization in Soil Aggregate Fractions with Different Fertilizer Treatments in Greenhouse Vegetable Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3897-:d:528070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.