IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3592-d522985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions and Social Values Regarding the Ecosystem Services of Beaches and Coastal Dunes in Yucatán, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Mendoza-González

    (CONACYT–Facultad de Ciencias, UMDI-Sisal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97302 Sierra Papacal, Yucatán, Mexico
    Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC), Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), 97356 Sisal, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • Arely Paredes-Chi

    (CONACYT–Facultad de Ciencias, UMDI-Sisal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97302 Sierra Papacal, Yucatán, Mexico
    Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC), Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), 97356 Sisal, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • Dalia Méndez-Funes

    (Facultad de Ciencias, UMDI-Sisal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97302 Sierra Papacal, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • María Giraldo

    (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores–Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97757 Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • Edgar Torres-Irineo

    (Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC), Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), 97356 Sisal, Yucatán, Mexico
    Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores–Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97757 Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • Eliana Arancibia

    (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores–Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97757 Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico)

  • Rodolfo Rioja-Nieto

    (Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC), Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), 97356 Sisal, Yucatán, Mexico
    Facultad de Ciencias, UMDI-Sisal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97302 Sierra Papacal, Yucatán, Mexico
    Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores–Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 97757 Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico)

Abstract

The ecosystem services (ESs) approach has been used as a powerful tool for the analysis of socio-ecological systems to investigate the relationship between society and the environment. The aim of this article is to analyze the social perceptions of stakeholders, forms of use (sociocultural and economic), and the conservation of beaches and coastal dunes in Yucatán, Mexico. Interviews were held with focus groups to analyze the forms of use, social perceptions of stakeholders, and the conservation of beaches and coastal dunes in Yucatán, Mexico. The results indicate that these ecosystems are important to different types of activities related to regulating, provisioning, and cultural services. However, degradation is identified as a consequence of contamination and land-use change. The main identified threats are natural phenomena, followed by the presence of garbage, human presence in natural environments, infrastructure construction, and privatization of beaches. The opinions (e.g., conservation, ecosystem services provision, drivers of change), emotions (e.g., joy, fear, sadness), and knowledge of the local community and tourists with respect to these ecosystems were evidenced. In general, there is an absence of conservation and sustainable management projects. However, community perceptions provide an opportunity to outline public conservation strategies in which the community, as a component of these socio-ecosystems, can be fully involved in their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Mendoza-González & Arely Paredes-Chi & Dalia Méndez-Funes & María Giraldo & Edgar Torres-Irineo & Eliana Arancibia & Rodolfo Rioja-Nieto, 2021. "Perceptions and Social Values Regarding the Ecosystem Services of Beaches and Coastal Dunes in Yucatán, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3592-:d:522985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braat, Leon C. & de Groot, Rudolf, 2012. "The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 4-15.
    2. Cebrián-Piqueras, M.A. & Karrasch, L. & Kleyer, M., 2017. "Coupling stakeholder assessments of ecosystem services with biophysical ecosystem properties reveals importance of social contexts," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 108-115.
    3. Nekane Castillo-Eguskitza & María F. Schmitz & Miren Onaindia & Alejandro J. Rescia, 2019. "Linking Biophysical and Economic Assessments of Ecosystem Services for a Social–Ecological Approach to Conservation Planning: Application in a Biosphere Reserve (Biscay, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Octavio Rojas & María Zamorano & Katia Saez & Carolina Rojas & Claudio Vega & Loretto Arriagada & Corina Basnou, 2017. "Social Perception of Ecosystem Services in a Coastal Wetland Post-Earthquake: A Case Study in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Ricketts, Taylor H. & Kremen, Claire & Carney, Karen & Swinton, Scott M., 2007. "Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 253-260, December.
    6. Christian M. Appendini & Rafael Meza-Padilla & Said Abud-Russell & Sébastien Proust & Roberto E. Barrios & Fernando Secaira-Fajardo, 2019. "Effect of climate change over landfalling hurricanes at the Yucatan Peninsula," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 469-482, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Fan & Henriksen, Christian Bugge & Porter, John, 2016. "Valuation of ecosystem services in organic cereal crop production systems with different management practices in relation to organic matter input," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 117-127.
    2. Spangenberg, Joachim H. & Settele, Josef, 2016. "Value pluralism and economic valuation – defendable if well done," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 100-109.
    3. Maia de Souza, Danielle & Lopes, Gabriela Russo & Hansson, Julia & Hansen, Karin, 2018. "Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: A synthesis of knowledge and recommendations for biofuels," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 200-210.
    4. van den Belt, Marjan & Blake, Daniella, 2014. "Ecosystem services in new Zealand agro-ecosystems: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 115-132.
    5. Mauerhofer, V., 2018. "The law, ecosystem services and ecosystem functions: An in-depth overview of coverage and interrelation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 190-198.
    6. D. D’Amato & M. Wan & N. Li & M. Rekola & A. Toppinen, 2018. "Managerial Views of Corporate Impacts and Dependencies on Ecosystem Services: A Case of International and Domestic Forestry Companies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1011-1028, July.
    7. Juan Tang & Yudi Fang & Ziyan Tian & Yinghua Gong & Liang Yuan, 2022. "Ecosystem Services Research in Green Sustainable Science and Technology Field: Trends, Issues, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. D'Alberto, R. & Targetti, S. & Schaller, L. & Bartolini, F. & Eichhorn, T. & Haltia, E. & Harmanny, K. & Le Gloux, F. & Nikolov, D. & Runge, T. & Vergamini, D. & Viaggi, D., 2024. "A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    12. Hendrawan, Dienda C P & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers' Livelihood Resilience and Decision Making in Replanting," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322441, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Shah, Syed Mahboob & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Qing & Casazza, Marco & Agostinho, Feni & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2021. "Sustainability assessment of agriculture production systems in Pakistan: A provincial-scale energy-based evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    14. Simelton, Elisabeth & Viet Dam, Bac, 2014. "Farmers in NE Viet Nam rank values of ecosystems from seven land uses," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 133-138.
    15. Jónsson, Jón Örvar G. & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P. & Giannakis, Georgios V., 2019. "Tools for Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Ecosystem Services, EROI and Economic Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 109-119.
    16. Martínez-Martínez, Yenisleidy & Dewulf, Jo & Casas-Ledón, Yannay, 2022. "GIS-based site suitability analysis and ecosystem services approach for supporting renewable energy development in south-central Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 363-376.
    17. Silva, J.F. & Santos, J.L. & Ribeiro, P.F. & Marta-Pedroso, C. & Magalhães, M.R. & Moreira, F., 2024. "A farming systems approach to assess synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Ehsan Moradi & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Enric Terol & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Alexandre Marco da Silva & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Hassan Khosravi & Manuel Pulido Fernández & Artemi Cerdà, 2020. "Quantifying Soil Compaction in Persimmon Orchards Using ISUM (Improved Stock Unearthing Method) and Core Sampling Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Andreea Ionescu & Radu Tudor & Alin-Ionuț Pleșoianu & Mioara Clius, 2022. "Online Environment as a Tool to Push Forward the Research: An Example for Landscape Disservices," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, February.
    20. Everard, Mark & Longhurst, James & Pontin, John & Stephenson, Wendy & Brooks, Joss, 2017. "Developed-developing world partnerships for sustainable development (1): An ecosystem services perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 241-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3592-:d:522985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.