IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3545-d522286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Irrigation with Coalbed Methane Co-Produced Water Reduces Forage Yield and Increases Soil Sodicity However Does Not Impact Forage Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Shital Poudyal

    (Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Valtcho D. Zheljazkov

    (Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

Abstract

The extraction of coalbed methane produces a significant amount of coalbed methane co-produced water (CBMW). Coalbed methane co-produced water is often characterized by high levels of pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), sodium (Na) and bicarbonate (HCO −3 ) and if used for irrigation without treatment, it may be detrimental to the surrounding soil, plants and environment. CBMW ideally should be disposed of by reinjection into the ground, but because of the significant cost associated, CBMW is commonly discharged onto soil or water surfaces. This study was conducted to elucidate the effect of the CBMW (with TDS value of <1500 ppm) at various blending ratios with fresh water on the yield and quality of representative forage crops [i.e., oat ( Avena sativa ) and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )]. Various blends of CBMW with fresh water reduced fresh and dry weight of alfalfa by 21.5–32% and 13–30%, respectively, and fresh and dry weight of oat by 0–17% and 0–14%, respectively. Irrigation with various blends of CBMW and fresh water increased soil pH and soil sodium adsorption ratio. However, forage quality parameters such as crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), total digestible nutrients (TDN) and relative feed value (RFV) of both forage crops remained unaffected.

Suggested Citation

  • Shital Poudyal & Valtcho D. Zheljazkov, 2021. "Irrigation with Coalbed Methane Co-Produced Water Reduces Forage Yield and Increases Soil Sodicity However Does Not Impact Forage Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3545-:d:522286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grattan, S.R. & Grieve, C.M. & Poss, J.A. & Robinson, P.H. & Suarez, D.L. & Benes, S.E., 2004. "Evaluation of salt-tolerant forages for sequential water reuse systems: III. Potential implications for ruminant mineral nutrition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 137-150, November.
    2. Anita M. Chaudhry & Edward B. Barbier, 2013. "Water and growth in an agricultural economy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(2), pages 175-189, March.
    3. Suyama, H. & Benes, S.E. & Robinson, P.H. & Grattan, S.R. & Grieve, C.M. & Getachew, G., 2007. "Forage yield and quality under irrigation with saline-sodic drainage water: Greenhouse evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 159-172, March.
    4. Grattan, S. R. & Grieve, C. M. & Poss, J. A. & Robinson, P. H. & Suarez, D. L. & Benes, S. E., 2004. "Evaluation of salt-tolerant forages for sequential water reuse systems: I. Biomass production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 109-120, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge F. S. Ferreira & Monica V. Cornacchione & Xuan Liu & Donald L. Suarez, 2015. "Nutrient Composition, Forage Parameters, and Antioxidant Capacity of Alfalfa ( Medicago sativa , L.) in Response to Saline Irrigation Water," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Díaz, F.J. & Grattan, S.R. & Reyes, J.A. & de la Roza-Delgado, B. & Benes, S.E. & Jiménez, C. & Dorta, M. & Tejedor, M., 2018. "Using saline soil and marginal quality water to produce alfalfa in arid climates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 11-21.
    3. Díaz, F.J. & Benes, S.E. & Grattan, S.R., 2013. "Field performance of halophytic species under irrigation with saline drainage water in the San Joaquin Valley of California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 59-69.
    4. Máximo F. Alonso & Dennis L. Corwin & James D. Oster & John Maas & Stephen R. Kaffka, 2013. "Modeling a Sustainable Salt Tolerant Grass-Livestock Production System under Saline Conditions in the Western San Joaquin Valley of California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Benes, S.E. & Adhikari, D.D. & Grattan, S.R. & Snyder, R.L., 2012. "Evapotranspiration potential of forages irrigated with saline-sodic drainage water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-7.
    6. Wei Li & Junliang Yin & Dongfang Ma & Qi Zheng & Hongwei Li & Jianlin Wang & Maolin Zhao & Xiaojing Liu & Zhensheng Li, 2023. "Acceptable Salinity Level for Saline Water Irrigation of Tall Wheatgrass in Edaphoclimatic Scenarios of the Coastal Saline–Alkaline Land around Bohai Sea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Suyama, H. & Benes, S.E. & Robinson, P.H. & Grattan, S.R. & Grieve, C.M. & Getachew, G., 2007. "Forage yield and quality under irrigation with saline-sodic drainage water: Greenhouse evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 159-172, March.
    8. Li, Jianshe & Gao, Yanming & Zhang, Xueyan & Tian, Ping & Li, Juan & Tian, Yongqiang, 2019. "Comprehensive comparison of different saline water irrigation strategies for tomato production: Soil properties, plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 521-533.
    9. Christopher Onosemuode & Tega L. Ataikiru & Osayomwanbor E. Oghama, 2016. "Assessment of Water Suitability for Irrigation in Keffi, Nasarawa State, Nigeria," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 5(07), pages 11-19, July.
    10. Ayars, James E. & Shouse, Peter & Lesch, Scott M., 2009. "In situ use of groundwater by alfalfa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1579-1586, November.
    11. J. Jed Brown & Probir Das & Mohammad Al-Saidi, 2018. "Sustainable Agriculture in the Arabian/Persian Gulf Region Utilizing Marginal Water Resources: Making the Best of a Bad Situation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Lee, Seung Oh & Jung, Younghun, 2018. "Efficiency of water use and its implications for a water-food nexus in the Aral Sea Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 80-90.
    13. Johnston, Christopher R. & Vance, George F. & Ganjegunte, Girisha K., 2008. "Irrigation with coalbed natural gas co-produced water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1243-1252, November.
    14. Kulawik, Jacek, 2015. "Selected problems of world agriculture," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 239245, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    15. Saadat, Saeed & Homaee, Mehdi, 2015. "Modeling sorghum response to irrigation water salinity at early growth stage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 119-124.
    16. Buisson, Marie-Charlotte & Balasubramanya, Soumya & Stifel, David C., 2020. "Effects of electric pumps on farm-level agricultural production and groundwater use in West Bengal," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304212, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Elgallal, M. & Fletcher, L. & Evans, B., 2016. "Assessment of potential risks associated with chemicals in wastewater used for irrigation in arid and semiarid zones: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 419-431.
    18. Amninder Singh & Nigel W. T. Quinn & Sharon E. Benes & Florence Cassel, 2020. "Policy-Driven Sustainable Saline Drainage Disposal and Forage Production in the Western San Joaquin Valley of California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    19. da Fonseca, Adriel Ferreira & Melfi, Adolpho Jose & Monteiro, Francisco Antonio & Montes, Celia Regina & Almeida, Vagner Vidal de & Herpin, Uwe, 2007. "Treated sewage effluent as a source of water and nitrogen for Tifton 85 bermudagrass," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 328-336, February.
    20. Hu, Yanzhe & Kang, Shaozhong & Ding, Risheng & Zhao, Qing, 2021. "A crude protein and fiber model of alfalfa incorporating growth age under water and salt stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3545-:d:522286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.