IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3232-d517462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Environmental Analysis of the Use of Green Hydrogen for Cogeneration from the Gasification of Wood and Fuel Cell

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Gonzalez-Diaz

    (National Institute of Electricity and Clean Energy, Reforma 113, Col. Palmira, Cuernavaca Morelos 62490, Mexico)

  • Juan Carlos Sánchez Ladrón de Guevara

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Long Jiang

    (Institution of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Maria Ortencia Gonzalez-Diaz

    (CONACYT—Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Calle 43 No. 130, Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida 97200, Mexico)

  • Pablo Díaz-Herrera

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Carolina Font-Palma

    (Department of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK)

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the use of wood biomass in a gasifier integrated with a fuel cell system as a low carbon technology. Experimental information of the wood is provided by the literature. The syngas is purified by using pressure swing adsorption (PSA) in order to obtain H 2 with 99.99% purity. Using 132 kg/h of wood, it is possible to generate 10.57 kg/h of H 2 that is used in a tubular solid oxide fuel cell (TSOFC). Then, the TSOFC generates 197.92 kW. The heat generated in the fuel cell produces 60 kg/h of steam that is needed in the gasifier. The net efficiency of the integrated system considering only the electric power generated in the TSOFC is 27.2%, which is lower than a gas turbine with the same capacity where the efficiency is around 33.1%. It is concluded that there is great potential for cogeneration with low carbon emission by using wood biomass in rural areas of developing countries e.g., with a carbon intensity of 98.35 kgCO 2 /MWh when compared with those of natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) without and with CO 2 capture i.e., 331 kgCO 2 /MWh and 40 kgCO 2 /MWh, respectively. This is an alternative technology for places where biomass is abundant and where it is difficult to get electricity from the grid due to limits in geographical location.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Gonzalez-Diaz & Juan Carlos Sánchez Ladrón de Guevara & Long Jiang & Maria Ortencia Gonzalez-Diaz & Pablo Díaz-Herrera & Carolina Font-Palma, 2021. "Techno-Environmental Analysis of the Use of Green Hydrogen for Cogeneration from the Gasification of Wood and Fuel Cell," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3232-:d:517462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santin, Marco & Traverso, Alberto & Magistri, Loredana & Massardo, Aristide, 2010. "Thermoeconomic analysis of SOFC-GT hybrid systems fed by liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1077-1083.
    2. Doherty, Wayne & Reynolds, Anthony & Kennedy, David, 2010. "Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4545-4555.
    3. William Stafford & Adrian Lotter & Alan Brent & Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Biofuels technology: A look forward," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-87, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. William Stafford & Adrian Lotter & Alan Brent & Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Biofuels technology: A look forward," WIDER Working Paper Series 087, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Murugan, S. & Horák, Bohumil, 2016. "A review of micro combined heat and power systems for residential applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 144-162.
    6. Jiang, L. & Gonzalez-Diaz, A. & Ling-Chin, J. & Roskilly, A.P. & Smallbone, A.J., 2019. "Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriele Loreti & Andrea Luigi Facci & Stefano Ubertini, 2021. "High-Efficiency Combined Heat and Power through a High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Hybrid System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Goran Majstrović, 2023. "Can Hydrogen Production Be Economically Viable on the Existing Gas-Fired Power Plant Location? New Empirical Evidence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rokni, Masoud, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC (solid oxide fuel cell)–Stirling hybrid plants using alternative fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-97.
    2. Montoya, Jorge & Valdés, Carlos & Chaquea, Hernando & Pecha, M. Brennan & Chejne, Farid, 2020. "Surplus electricity production and LCOE estimation in Colombian palm oil mills using empty fresh bunches (EFB) as fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Mukhtar, Ahmad & Saqib, Sidra & Mubashir, Muhammad & Ullah, Sami & Inayat, Abrar & Mahmood, Abid & Ibrahim, Muhammad & Show, Pau Loke, 2021. "Mitigation of CO2 emissions by transforming to biofuels: Optimization of biofuels production processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Polverino, Pierpaolo & Sorrentino, Marco & Pianese, Cesare, 2017. "A model-based diagnostic technique to enhance faults isolability in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1198-1214.
    5. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    6. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Firouzmakan, Pouya & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Bornapour, Mosayeb & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2019. "A comprehensive stochastic energy management system of micro-CHP units, renewable energy sources and storage systems in microgrids considering demand response programs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 355-368.
    8. Li, Yang & Wang, Jinlong & Zhao, Dongbo & Li, Guoqing & Chen, Chen, 2018. "A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: Combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 237-254.
    9. Muhammad Kashif Rafique & Zunaib Maqsood Haider & Khawaja Khalid Mehmood & Muhammad Saeed Uz Zaman & Muhammad Irfan & Saad Ullah Khan & Chul-Hwan Kim, 2018. "Optimal Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Resources for a Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Laura Canale & Anna Rita Di Fazio & Mario Russo & Andrea Frattolillo & Marco Dell’Isola, 2021. "An Overview on Functional Integration of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Multi-Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    11. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.
    12. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2023. "Hydrogen-rich gas as a fuel for the gas turbines: A pathway to lower CO2 emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 6-18.
    14. Xiao Sun & Qi Cheng & Jiren Tang & Xing Guo & Yunzhong Jia & Jingfu Mu & Guilin Zhao & Yalu Liu, 2023. "Assessment of the CO 2 Geological Storage Potential of Yanchang Shale Gas Formation (Chang7 Member) Considering the Capillary Sealing Capability of Caprock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Lambert, Jerry & Hanel, Andreas & Fendt, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Evaluation of sector-coupled energy systems using different foresight horizons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    17. Gimelli, A. & Mottola, F. & Muccillo, M. & Proto, D. & Amoresano, A. & Andreotti, A. & Langella, G., 2019. "Optimal configuration of modular cogeneration plants integrated by a battery energy storage system providing peak shaving service," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 974-993.
    18. Pan, Zehua & Shen, Jian & Wang, Jingyi & Xu, Xinhai & Chan, Wei Ping & Liu, Siyu & Zhou, Yexin & Yan, Zilin & Jiao, Zhenjun & Lim, Teik-Thye & Zhong, Zheng, 2022. "Thermodynamic analyses of a standalone diesel-fueled distributed power generation system based on solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    19. Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Santarelli, M. & Borchiellini, R., 2013. "Thermoeconomic analysis of large solid oxide fuel cell plants: Atmospheric vs. pressurized performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 142-155.
    20. Kalina, Jacek, 2016. "Complex thermal energy conversion systems for efficient use of locally available biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 105-115.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3232-:d:517462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.