IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2958-d513379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profiling Visitors to Romanian Ecotourism Destinations

Author

Listed:
  • Cristinel Petrișor Constantin

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Vasile Papuc-Damașcan

    (Association of Ecotourism in Romania, 500051 Brașov, Romania)

  • Andrei Blumer

    (Association of Ecotourism in Romania, 500051 Brașov, Romania)

  • Ruxandra-Gabriela Albu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Titus Suciu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Adina Nicoleta Candrea

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Ana Ispas

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

Abstract

Visitors’ increasing interest in nature-based and cultural tourism, especially in the context of ecotourism destinations, has generated a heated debate in tourism literature. Some authors consider that ecotourism should be approached through a niche strategy rather than through mass marketing. Therefore, identifying the main characteristics of visitors to ecotourism destinations is very important in setting management and marketing strategies adapted to their specific needs. The present paper aims to identify the profile of visitors to Romanian ecotourism destinations, considering the ecotourism potential of this country and the scarcity of empirical studies on these types of destinations. To reach this aim, a survey was conducted in four Romanian ecotourism destinations. By computing the data collected from a sample of 1157 visitors, four visitor segments have been identified based on a single characteristic (visit purpose). Crosstabulation and Chi-square analysis were used in order to identify the profiles of these segments. The results reveal that most of respondents are nature travellers, followed by culture travellers. The findings may be used by ecotourism destination managers in order to target specific market segments and establish proper management and marketing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristinel Petrișor Constantin & Vasile Papuc-Damașcan & Andrei Blumer & Ruxandra-Gabriela Albu & Titus Suciu & Adina Nicoleta Candrea & Ana Ispas, 2021. "Profiling Visitors to Romanian Ecotourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2958-:d:513379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2958/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2958/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juvan, Emil & Dolnicar, Sara, 2016. "Measuring environmentally sustainable tourist behaviour," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 30-44.
    2. Jinyang Deng & Jian Li, 2019. "Segmentation of Nature-Based Tourists in a Rural Area (2008–2009): A Single-Item Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Remus Ion Hornoiu & Mihaela Ana Padurean & Ana-Maria Nica & Liviu-George Maha, 2014. "Tourism Consumpion Behavior in Natural Protected Areas," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(Special 8), pages 1178-1178, August.
    4. Kim, Aise KyoungJin & Weiler, Betty, 2013. "Visitors' attitudes towards responsible fossil collecting behaviour: An environmental attitude-based segmentation approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 602-612.
    5. Ariadna Ioana JURAVLE (GAVRA) & Constantin SASU & Loredana TEREC-VLAD, 2016. "The Destination Image Of Bucovina Among Romanian Tourists," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 139-149, December.
    6. Yoonjeong Jeong & Seweryn Zielinski & Ji-soon Chang & Seong-il Kim, 2018. "Comparing Motivation-Based and Motivation-Attitude-Based Segmentation of Tourists Visiting Sensitive Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Xijing Cui & Gyehee Lee & Seung Jea Lee & Taegoo Terry Kim, 2019. "Structural Relationships among Antecedents to Perceived Value of Ecotourism for Sichuan Giant Pandas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Marco Valeri & Rodolfo Baggio, 2021. "A critical reflection on the adoption of blockchain in tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 121-132, June.
    9. do Valle, Patrícia Oom & Pintassilgo, Pedro & Matias, António & André, Filipe, 2012. "Tourist attitudes towards an accommodation tax earmarked for environmental protection: A survey in the Algarve," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1408-1416.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Priyan Perera & Shashini Tara Mallikage & David Newsome & Richard Vlosky, 2022. "Profiling of Shelter Campers, Their Attitudes, and Perceptions towards Environmental Impacts of Campsite Use and Management: Evidence from National Parks of Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Alina-Petronela Haller & Georgia-Daniela Tacu Hârșan, 2023. "Longitudinal Analysis of Sustainable Tourism Potential of the Black Sea Riparian States Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Blanca Estela Bernal Escoto & Nancy Imelda Montero Delgado & Flavio Abel Rivera Aguirre, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Sustainable Tourism in Baja California against COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Conrado Carrascosa-López & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2022. "Market Segmentation by Motivations in Ecotourism: Application in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Tiantian Guo & Jidong Wang & Chen Li, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Influencing Mechanism of Tourism Ecological Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fajri Ansari & Yoonjeong Jeong & Indra ASLP Putri & Seong-il Kim, 2019. "Sociopsychological Aspects of Butterfly Souvenir Purchasing Behavior at Bantimurung Bulusaraung National Park in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Juan Ignacio Pulido-Fernández & Yaiza López-Sánchez, 2016. "Are Tourists Really Willing to Pay More for Sustainable Destinations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Adongo, Charles A. & Taale, Francis & Adam, Issahaku, 2018. "Tourists' values and empathic attitude toward sustainable development in tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 251-263.
    4. Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Cultural City Life: Evidence from EU Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 461-478, April.
    5. Levent Selman GOKTAS & Serkan Polat, 0. "Tourist Tax Practices in European Union Member Countries and Its Applicability in Turkey," Journal of Tourismology, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 145-158.
    6. Liliana Hîncu, 2017. "Bucovina Tourist Destination," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Liu, Chih-Hsing & Dong, Tse-Ping & Vu, Ho Tran, 2023. "Transformed virtual concepts into reality: Linkage the viewpoint of entrepreneurial passion, technology adoption propensity and advantage to usage intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Jonmenjoy Barman & Somenath Halder & Jayanta Das & Syed Sadath Ali & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Rukhsana & Mohamed Zhran, 2024. "Sustainable Ecotourism Suitability Assessment Using the Intergraded TOPSIS Model in the State of Mizoram, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-31, December.
    9. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Muhammad Junaid Ahsan & Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Ali Raza & Qurat‐ul‐ain Talpur, 2024. "Let leaders permit nature! Role of employee engagement, environmental values, and sustainable behavioral intentions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7905-7921, December.
    12. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    13. Philip R. Walsh & Rachel Dodds & Julianna Priskin & Jonathon Day & Oxana Belozerova, 2021. "The Corporate Responsibility Paradox: A Multi-National Investigation of Business Traveller Attitudes and Their Sustainable Travel Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Andreea F. Schiopu & Dragos C. Vasile & Claudia E. Tuclea, 2015. "Principles and Best Practices in Successful Tourism Business Incubators," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 474-474, February.
    16. Liliana Hîncu, 2017. "Aspects Of Ethics And Responsibilities In The Activity Of Promoting Tourism," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, august.
    17. Xiufang Jiang & Jianxiong Qin & Jianguo Gao & Mollie G Gossage, 2022. "The mediation of perceived risk’s impact on destination image and travel intention: An empirical study of Chengdu, China during COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Antonio Marsi & Emanuela Randon, 2021. "Tourist Tax and Ratings of Online Reviews," Working Papers wp1168, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    19. Xiaohui Hou & Bo Wang & Yu Gao, 2020. "Stakeholder Protection, Public Trust, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Listed SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2958-:d:513379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.