IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2853-d511791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agile-Based Education for Teaching an Agile Requirements Engineering Methodology for Knowledge Management

Author

Listed:
  • Meira Levy

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Shenkar College of Engineering, Design, Art, Ramat Gan 5252626, Israel
    Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Irit Hadar

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Itzhak Aviv

    (Systems Engineering Research Initiative (TAU SERI), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel)

Abstract

The importance of the role that knowledge management (KM) plays in the success of knowledge-intensive organizations has long been acknowledged. However, requirements engineering (RE) methods for KM solutions still lack maturity, as do the educational programs in this domain. In this paper, an agile-based educational method for teaching RE for KM solutions, specifically an agile KM RE methodology (AKM-REM), is proposed. The paper reports a teaching experience, in which 17 teams of graduate students learned and implemented AKM-REM, each in a different real-life case study. Data were collected via class observations and from the students’ submitted projects and underwent qualitative content analysis. The findings demonstrate the manner in which AKM-REM creates a culture of collaboration, trust, and reflection, fostering the dynamic and flexible organization that is required in today’s competitive business environment. The contribution of this paper is fourfold. First, it presents an extension of the research on agile-based RE for KM solutions as a specialized area. Second, it presents an extension of an existing method KM-REM along the agile principles. Third, it provides means for agile-based education for analyzing and addressing KM challenges effectively. Finally, it describes the importance of agile KM RE in the context of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Meira Levy & Irit Hadar & Itzhak Aviv, 2021. "Agile-Based Education for Teaching an Agile Requirements Engineering Methodology for Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2853-:d:511791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Bitkowska, 2020. "The relationship between Business Process Management and Knowledge Management - selected aspects from a study of companies in Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 169-193.
    2. Caroline S. Wagner & Travis A. Whetsell & Loet Leydesdorff, 2017. "Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1633-1652, March.
    3. Soundararajan, Vivek & Sahasranamam, Sreevas & Khan, Zaheer & Jain, Tanusree, 2021. "Multinational enterprises and the governance of sustainability practices in emerging market supply chains: An agile governance perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    4. Waleed Rashad & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Global Sourcing Strategies: A Framework for Lean, Agile, and Leagile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, September.
    5. McWilliam, Sarah E. & Kim, Jung Kwan & Mudambi, Ram & Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2020. "Global value chain governance: Intersections with international business," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    6. Carine Khalil & Sabine Khalil, 0. "Exploring knowledge management in agile software development organizations," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    7. Olga Sobolewska, 2020. "Knowledge-oriented business process management as a catalyst to the existence of network organizations," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 107-132.
    8. Ana Moreno Romero & Ángel Uruburu & Ajay K. Jain & Manuel Acevedo Ruiz & Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz, 2020. "The Path towards Evolutionary—Teal Organizations: A Relationship Trigger on Collaborative Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Soundararajan, Vivek & Brown, Jill A. & Wicks, Andrew C., 2019. "Can Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Improve Global Supply Chains? Improving Deliberative Capacity with a Stakeholder Orientation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 385-412, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yossi Dahan & Hanna Lerner & Faina Milman-Sivan, 2023. "Shared Responsibility and Labor Rights in Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1025-1040, February.
    2. Rong (Ratchel) Zeng & Birgitte Grøgaard & Ingmar Björkman, 2023. "Navigating MNE control and coordination: A critical review and directions for future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(9), pages 1599-1622, December.
    3. Itzhak Aviv & Irit Hadar & Meira Levy, 2021. "Knowledge Management Infrastructure Framework for Enhancing Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    4. Uwe Cantner & Martin Kalthaus & Matthias Menter & Pierre Mohnen, 2023. "Global knowledge flows: characteristics, determinants, and impacts," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(5), pages 1063-1076.
    5. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    6. Hans Pohl, 2021. "Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1329-1358, February.
    7. Peter Sjögårde & Fereshteh Didegah, 2022. "The association between topic growth and citation impact of research publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1903-1921, April.
    8. Zhai, Li & Yan, Xiangbin, 2022. "A directed collaboration network for exploring the order of scientific collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    9. Reis, Germano Glufke & Villar, Eduardo Guedes & Prado Gimenez, Fernando Antonio & Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte & Ferri, Priscila, 2022. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Pham, Hanh Song Thi & Petersen, Bent, 2021. "The bargaining power, value capture, and export performance of Vietnamese manufacturers in global value chains," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    11. Gary Gereffi, 2020. "What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 287-301, September.
    12. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Agnieszka Rzepka & Ryszard Borowiecki & Zbigniew Olesińki, 2021. "Energy Efficiency in the Industry 4.0 Era: Attributes of Teal Organisations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Wu, Jie & Zahoor, Nadia & Khan, Zaheer & Meyer, Martin, 2023. "The effects of inward FDI communities on the research and development intensity of emerging market locally domiciled firms: Partial foreign ownership as a contingency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    15. Zahoor, Nadia & Khan, Zaheer & Shenkar, Oded, 2023. "International vertical alliances within the international business field: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    16. Iyere Mary & Misopoulos Fotios, 2022. "The degree of stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(2), pages 9-26, June.
    17. Abramo, Giovanni & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers: Does the geographic proximity effect decay over time? A discipline-level analysis, accounting for cognitive proximity, with and without self-citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    18. Valentina Marano & Miriam Wilhelm & Tatiana Kostova & Jonathan Doh & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, 2024. "Multinational firms and sustainability in global supply chains: scope and boundaries of responsibility," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(4), pages 413-428, June.
    19. Graf, Holger & Kalthaus, Martin, 2018. "International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1198-1214.
    20. Susana C. Esper & Luciano Barin-Cruz & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2024. "Engaging Stakeholders During Intergovernmental Conflict: How Political Attributions Shape Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2853-:d:511791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.