IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2056-d499314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Quality Management Systems in the Current Paradigm: The Role of Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudia Sousa Silva

    (GOVCOPP, Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • José Magano

    (ISCET-High Institute of Business Sciences and Tourism, Rua de Cedofeita, 285, 4050-180 Porto, Portugal
    Research Center in Business and Economics (CICEE), Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Rua Sta. Marta 47, 5.º Andar, 1150-293 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Matos

    (Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Teresa Nogueira

    (Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology (CIETI), Polytechnic Institute of Porto, R. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study supports the proposition that sustainability’s integration into Quality Management Systems (QMS) could be a viable pathway to the development of the Emergency paradigm, in which leadership plays a crucial role. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was performed in order to deepen leadership’s relationship with Quality Management (QM) from an evolutionary perspective. An exploratory survey was then conducted to assess quality managers’ perceptions of sustainability’s integration into QMS and their leadership styles, using the 5X Short Leader Form MLQ instrument. The results indicate that leadership is a critical element of QMS performance, enhancing transformational leadership, which appears to be the dominant self-perceived style of the quality managers who participated. Nevertheless, these practitioners recognise the difficulties in committing all employees to the sustainability journey. The theoretical and managerial implications give rise to this work. The SLR results could be a useful database to support future QM and Leadership research. The organisations could follow the suggested pathway to evolve their QMS to support solutions to some of the current challenges. At the same time, quality managers could reflect on their future professional challenges. This work has taken a step forward, indicating sustainable quality management systems as a viable pathway to explore QM knowledge regarding the Emergency paradigm, and thus enhancing leadership’s role.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudia Sousa Silva & José Magano & Ana Matos & Teresa Nogueira, 2021. "Sustainable Quality Management Systems in the Current Paradigm: The Role of Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2056-:d:499314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2056/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2056/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cláudia Silva & José Magano & Anna Moskalenko & Teresa Nogueira & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Hélder Fernando Pedrosa e Sousa, 2020. "Sustainable Management Systems Standards (SMSS): Structures, Roles, and Practices in Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Dominik Zimon & Peter Madzik & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "The Influence of ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 on Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Anders Fundin & Bo Bergman & Mattias Elg, 2017. "The Quality Dilemma: Combining Development and Stability," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Tomas Backström & Anders Fundin & Peter E. Johansson (ed.), Innovative Quality Improvements in Operations, chapter 0, pages 9-33, Springer.
    4. Shih‐Fang Lo, 2010. "Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 311-319, November.
    5. Amal Farouk Soliman, 2018. "A proposed model for leadership styles effect on total quality management implementation: an applied study on telecommunication for mobile service companies in Egypt," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(3), pages 373-397.
    6. Tsitaire Jean Arrive & Mei Feng & Yafen Yan & Samwel Macharia Chege, 2019. "The involvement of telecommunication industry in the road to corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 152-158, January.
    7. Robert Strand, 2014. "Strategic Leadership of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(4), pages 687-706, September.
    8. Craig Deegan & Muhammad Azizul Islam, 2012. "Corporate Commitment to Sustainability – Is it All Hot Air? An Australian Review of the Linkage between Executive Pay and Sustainable Performance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(4), pages 384-397, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartosz Spychalski, 2023. "Holistic Education for Sustainable Development: A Study of Shaping the Pro-Quality Attitude of Students in the Polish Educational System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Lucian Ispas & Costel Mironeasa & Alessandro Silvestri, 2023. "Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Teresa Nogueira & José Carvalho & José Magano, 2022. "Eco-Friendly Ester Fluid for Power Transformers versus Mineral Oil: Design Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "Toward a System Theory of Corporate Sustainability: An Interim Struggle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Alena Pauliková & Katarína Lestyánszka Škůrková & Lucia Kopilčáková & Antoaneta Zhelyazkova-Stoyanova & Damyan Kirechev, 2021. "Innovative Approaches to Model Visualization for Integrated Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Yitno Purwoko & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Rethinking Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Villager’s Point of View and Case Study in Pampang Village, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arménio Rego & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Daniel Polónia, 2017. "Corporate Sustainability: A View From the Top," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 133-157, June.
    2. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    3. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Waris Ali & Zeeshan Mahmood & Jeffrey Wilson & Hina Ismail, 2024. "The impact of sustainability governance attributes on comprehensive CSR reporting: A developing country setting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1802-1817, May.
    5. Yusheng Kong & Alex Antwi‐Adjei & Jonas Bawuah, 2020. "A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 444-454, March.
    6. Zaheer Alam & Yasir Bin Tariq, 2023. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Evaluation and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    7. Judit Creixans-Tenas & Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Núria Arimany-Serrat, 2020. "Social Responsibility, Communication and Financial Data of Hospitals: A Structural Modelling Approach in a Sustainability Scope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Giovanna Campopiano & Patricia Gabaldón & Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez, 2023. "Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance: An Integrative Review of the Literature and a Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 717-746, January.
    10. Piotr Zientara & Paulina Bohdanowicz-Godfrey & Claire Whitely & Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2020. "A Case Study of LightStay (2010–2017)—Hilton’s Corporate Responsibility Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Radojko LUKIC, 2012. "Sustainable Development of Retail in Serbia," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(4), pages 574-586, October.
    12. Jane Boeske & Peter A. Murray, 2022. "The Intellectual Domains of Sustainability Leadership in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Zhe Sun & Kumar Jai & Liang Zhao, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability of Local Community: A Case Study of the Transnational Project in China-Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Gil Cohen, 2023. "ESG risks and corporate survival," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 16-21, March.
    15. Salome Zimmermann, 2019. "Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Fan Li & Lin Wang & Zhigang Jin & Lifang Huang & Bo Xia, 2020. "Key factors affecting sustained business operations after an earthquake: a case study from New Beichuan, China, 2013–2017," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 101-121, October.
    17. Asit Bhattacharyya & Lorne Cummings, 2015. "Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance – Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 309-325, July.
    18. O'Shaughnessy, Eric & Heeter, Jenny & Shah, Chandra & Koebrich, Sam, 2021. "Corporate acceleration of the renewable energy transition and implications for electric grids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Kateryna Lysenko-Ryba & Dominik Zimon, 2021. "Customer Behavioral Reactions to Negative Experiences during the Product Return," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Muhammad Noshab Hussain & Zaiyang Li, 2024. "Dynamic Appertain Between Telecommunication Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence of OIC Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1973-1992, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2056-:d:499314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.