IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1015-d483356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Coupling PS System with Building Protection in an Ultrasoft Strata Colliery

Author

Listed:
  • Song Guo

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Guangli Guo

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xiangsheng Yang

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Qiu Du

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

To guarantee the stability of a building complex above a planned mining district with ultrasoft strata, strip mining technology (SMT) was applied to control the displacement and deformation caused by underground exploitation. This study attempts to design a reasonable pillar width to establish a stable pillar-support (PS) system composed of ground buildings with coal pillars underneath. Based on the stratigraphic structure of ultrasoft strata and in situ measurement data of mining subsidence monitoring, this study takes an ultrasoft strata colliery in western Henan province, central China, as an example to examine the technical and economical feasibility of the proposed PSsyst under two mining scenarios. The major results indicated that the initial design of pillar width would be 120 m under scenario 1, with expected damage of only 450 mm maximum subsidence predicted by probability integration method (PIM); while under scenario 2, the cost of compensation for buildings’ mining-induced damage would increase to CNY 61.31 million with an expected output of 7.629 million tons of raw coal. Moreover, the protection rate of the residential area in the proposed postmining area of scenario 1 can reach as much as 6.91% comparing to the fully mechanized coal winning technology in scenario 2. Overall, the proposed PSsyst will bring good benefits both economically and environmentally and should be worth promoting as a reference for similar geological and mining conditions in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Song Guo & Guangli Guo & Xiangsheng Yang & Qiu Du, 2021. "Feasibility of Coupling PS System with Building Protection in an Ultrasoft Strata Colliery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1015-:d:483356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Kivinen, 2017. "Sustainable Post-Mining Land Use: Are Closed Metal Mines Abandoned or Re-Used Space?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ximin Cui & Yuling Zhao & Guorui Wang & Bing Zhang & Chunyi Li, 2020. "Calculation of Residual Surface Subsidence Above Abandoned Longwall Coal Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Xiaojun Zhu & Guangli Guo & Hui Liu & Xueni Peng & Xiaoyu Yang, 2020. "Research on the Stability Evaluation Model of Composite Support Pillar in Backfill-Strip Mining," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Marwan Al Heib & Christian Franck & Hippolyte Djizanne & Marie Degas, 2023. "Post-Mining Multi-Hazard Assessment for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Li Li & Dezhong Kong & Qinzhi Liu & Yu Xiong & Fei Chen & Haibing Zhang & Yunyun Chu, 2022. "Comprehensive Identification of Surface Subsidence Evaluation Grades of Mines in Southwest China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Katarzyna Pactwa & Justyna Woźniak & Michał Dudek, 2020. "Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Yang Yu & Shen-En Chen & Ka-Zhong Deng & Peng Wang & Hong-Dong Fan, 2018. "Subsidence Mechanism and Stability Assessment Methods for Partial Extraction Mines for Sustainable Development of Mining Cities—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Erhu Bai & Xueyi Li & Wenbing Guo & Yi Tan & Mingjie Guo & Peng Wen & Zhibao Ma, 2022. "Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Surface Residual Deformation above Longwall Abandoned Goaf," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Sonja Kivinen & Kaarina Vartiainen & Timo Kumpula, 2018. "People and Post-Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Mateusz Dudek & Anton Sroka & Krzysztof Tajduś & Rafał Misa & Dawid Mrocheń, 2022. "Assessment and Duration of the Surface Subsidence after the End of Mining Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. André Vervoort, 2020. "The Time Duration of the Effects of Total Extraction Mining Methods on Surface Movement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Izabela-Maria Apostu & Maria Lazar & Florin Faur, 2021. "A Suggested Methodology for Assessing the Failure Risk of the Final Slopes of Former Open-Pits in Case of Flooding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Honglei Liu & Qiang Wu & Jianxin Chen & Mingjun Wang & Di Zhao & Cheng Duan, 2021. "Environmental Impacts Related to Closed Mines in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Marta Nalej & Elżbieta Lewandowicz, 2023. "An Analysis of Recreational and Leisure Areas in Polish Counties with the Use of Geographically Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Jacek Różkowski & Oimahmad Rahmonov & Artur Szymczyk, 2020. "Environmental Transformations in the Area of the Kuźnica Warężyńska Sand Mine, Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Ayanda N. Shabalala & Phumelele D. Ngwenya & Moses Timana, 2022. "Heavy Metal Contamination and Health Risk of Soils and Vegetables Grown Near a Gold Mine Area: A Case Study of Barberton, South Africa," Academic Journal of Chemistry, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(3), pages 197-207, 07-2022.
    15. Stefanie Streit & Michael Tost & Katharina Gugerell, 2023. "Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Chrysoula Pagouni & Francis Pavloudakis & Ioannis Kapageridis & Athena Yiannakou, 2024. "Transitional and Post-Mining Land Uses: A Global Review of Regulatory Frameworks, Decision-Making Criteria, and Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, July.
    17. Hámor-Vidó, Mária & Hámor, Tamás & Czirok, Lili, 2021. "Underground space, the legal governance of a critical resource in circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Yueshu Yang & Daxiang Liu & Hai Xiao & Jiangang Chen & Yu Ding & Dong Xia & Zhenyao Xia & Wennian Xu, 2019. "Evaluating the Effect of the Ecological Restoration of Quarry Slopes in Caidian District, Wuhan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Takashi Sasaoka & Pisith Mao & Hideki Shimada & Akihiro Hamanaka & Jiro Oya, 2020. "Numerical Analysis of Longwall Gate-Entry Stability under Weak Geological Condition: A Case Study of an Indonesian Coal Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Francis Pavloudakis & Christos Roumpos & Evangelos Karlopoulos & Nikolaos Koukouzas, 2020. "Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1015-:d:483356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.