IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13621-d698733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Yield and Quality of Silage and Hay for Pea–Barley Mixtures Ratio under Irrigated Arid Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Walid Soufan

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The changing climate, water scarcity, reduction in the land area under forage crops, expanding ruminant population, burgeoning demands for milk and meat production and food security concerns all insist on a necessary increase in forage production and quality. Cereal–legume mixed intercropping offers a biologically superior option to boost herbage yield and quality of preserved fodder (hay and silage), provided that rationalization of the component crop’s proportional ratio is performed. Therefore, the current study was conducted to determine the forage yield and quality of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and pea ( Pisum sativum L.) mixtures at the ratios 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100. The experiment was laid out in the regular arrangement of a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The results exhibited that forage quality was significantly affected by the mixture ratio. There was a significant improvement in protein, fiber rate and digestibility from the mixture. The ratios of barley and pea with 50:50 and 25:75 produced the maximum productivity and the best quality of forage. Regarding forage preservation, silage recorded higher contents of crude protein, ash and lower fiber contents than hay. Among seed mixtures, 0:100 ratio of barley–pea yielded the highest quality of silage with the maximum crude protein, ash and digestibility with lowest fiber contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Walid Soufan & Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani, 2021. "Optimizing Yield and Quality of Silage and Hay for Pea–Barley Mixtures Ratio under Irrigated Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13621-:d:698733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunyad Sohail & Muhammad Ansar & Milan Skalicky & Allah Wasaya & Walid Soufan & Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir & Ahmed M. El-Shehawi & Marian Brestic & Mohammad Sohidul Islam & Muhammad Ali Raza & Ayman EL Sabag, 2021. "Influence of Tillage Systems and Cereals–Legume Mixture on Fodder Yield, Quality and Net Returns under Rainfed Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Kazimierz Klima & Agnieszka Synowiec & Joanna Puła & Maciej Chowaniak & Katarzyna Pużyńska & Dorota Gala-Czekaj & Angelika Kliszcz & Patryk Galbas & Beata Jop & Teresa Dąbkowska & Andrzej Lepiarczyk, 2020. "Long-Term Productive, Competitive, and Economic Aspects of Spring Cereal Mixtures in Integrated and Organic Crop Rotations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Jamal Nasar & Ashfaq Alam & Aisha Nasar & Muhammad Zubair Khan, 2019. "Intercropping Induce Changes in Above and Below Ground Plant Compartments in Mixed Cropping System," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 17(5), pages 13043-13050, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Honglu Wang & Vivek Yadav & Thongsouk Sompouviseth & Baili Feng, 2022. "Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Honglu Wang & Vivek Yadav & Thongsouk Sompouviseth & Baili Feng, 2022. "Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Anna Wenda-Piesik & Dariusz Piesik, 2020. "Diversity of Species and the Occurrence and Development of a Specialized Pest Population—A Review Article," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Altyn Shayakhmetova & Aldiyar Bakirov & Inna Savenkova & Beybit Nasiyev & Murat Akhmetov & Azamat Useinov & Akerke Temirbulatova & Nurbolat Zhanatalapov & Askhat Bekkaliyev & Fariza Mukanova & Mariya , 2024. "Optimization of Productivity of Fodder Crops with Green Conveyor System in the Context of Climate Instability in the North Kazakhstan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Katarzyna Pużyńska & Stanisław Pużyński & Agnieszka Synowiec & Jan Bocianowski & Andrzej Lepiarczyk, 2021. "Grain Yield and Total Protein Content of Organically Grown Oats–Vetch Mixtures Depending on Soil Type and Oats’ Cultivar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Joanna Puła & Kazimierz Klima & Angelika Kliszcz & Andrzej Lepiarczyk, 2024. "Anti-Erosion Effectiveness of Selected Crops in Sustainable Mountain Agriculture in a Warming Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13621-:d:698733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.