IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13009-d686815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Model of Sustainable Robo-Advisors: Empirical Insights for Practical Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Cam-Duc Au

    (ISF Institute for Strategic Finance, FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, 45127 Essen, Germany)

  • Lars Klingenberger

    (ISF Institute for Strategic Finance, FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, 45127 Essen, Germany)

  • Martin Svoboda

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Eric Frère

    (ISF Institute for Strategic Finance, FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, 45127 Essen, Germany)

Abstract

The given research paper examines the characteristics of German private investors regarding the probability of using robo-advisory-services. The used data set was gathered for this purpose (N = 305) to address the research question by using a logistic regression approach. The presented logit regression model results indicate that the awareness of sustainable aspects make a significant difference in the probability of using a sustainable robo-service. Additionally, our findings show that being male and cost-aware are positively associated with the use of a sustainable robo-advisor. Furthermore, the probability of use is 1.53 times higher among young and experienced investors. The findings in this paper provide relevant research findings for banks, asset managers, FinTechs, policy makers and financial practitioners to increase the adoption rate of robo-advice by introducing a sustainable offering.

Suggested Citation

  • Cam-Duc Au & Lars Klingenberger & Martin Svoboda & Eric Frère, 2021. "Business Model of Sustainable Robo-Advisors: Empirical Insights for Practical Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13009-:d:686815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2021. "Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Helen Chiappini, 2017. "Impact-Oriented Investment Funds: An Overview," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, in: Social Impact Funds, chapter 0, pages 51-91, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Cocca, Teodoro, 2016. "Potential and Limitations of Virtual Advice in Wealth Management," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 44, pages 45-57.
    4. Christian Hildebrand & Anouk Bergner, 2021. "Conversational robo advisors as surrogates of trust: onboarding experience, firm perception, and consumer financial decision making," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 659-676, July.
    5. Helen Chiappini, 2017. "Social Impact Funds," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-55260-6, February.
    6. Cordes, Joseph J., 2017. "Using cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment to evaluate the impact of social enterprise: Promises, implementation, and limitations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-104.
    7. Umar, Zaghum & Gubareva, Mariya & Yousaf, Imran & Ali, Shoaib, 2021. "A tale of company fundamentals vs sentiment driven pricing: The case of GameStop," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    8. Jun Xie & Wataru Nozawa & Michiyuki Yagi & Hidemichi Fujii & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 286-300, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cardillo, Giovanni & Chiappini, Helen, 2024. "Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    2. Orkun Bayram & Isilay Talay & Mete Feridun, 2022. "Can Fintech Promote Sustainable Finance? Policy Lessons from the Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petridis, Konstantinos & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & Drogalas, George & Kiosses, Nikolaos, 2022. "A Support Vector Machine model for classification of efficiency: An application to M&A," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Deng, Xiang & Li, Weihao & Ren, Xiaohang, 2023. "More sustainable, more productive: Evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Anrafel Souza Barbosa & Maria Cristina Basilio Crispim Silva & Luiz Bueno Silva & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Vinícius Fernandes Souza, 2023. "Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù, 2023. "ESG controversies and bank risk taking," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 274-288, January.
    6. Xin Xu & Zizhen Liu, 2023. "ESG, Cultural Distance and Corporate Profitability: Evidence from Chinese Multinationals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Lishi Zeng & Xuemei Jiang, 2023. "ESG and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Agriculture and Forestry Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Johnny Jermias, 2022. "The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2992-3013, November.
    10. Yousaf, Imran & Youssef, Manel & Goodell, John W., 2022. "Quantile connectedness between sentiment and financial markets: Evidence from the S&P 500 twitter sentiment index," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Ming Yuan & Jingya Dang & Yujie Hong & Di Gao & Ziyi Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Supply Chain Network Centrality on Sustainable Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    13. André Betzer & Jan Philipp Harries, 2022. "How online discussion board activity affects stock trading: the case of GameStop," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 36(4), pages 443-472, December.
    14. Darie Casiana Maria, 2023. "The Link between Business Benefits and ERP Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1957-1966, July.
    15. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    16. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Robert Engle & Marina Brogi & Nicola Cucari & Valentina Lagasio, 2021. "Environmental, Social, Governance: Implications for businesses and effects for stakeholders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1423-1425, September.
    19. Naveed, Muhammad & Ali, Shoaib & Gubareva, Mariya & Omri, Anis, 2024. "When giants fall: Tracing the ripple effects of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapse on global financial markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    20. Bhatia, Ankita & Chandani, Arti & Chhateja, Jagriti, 2020. "Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors — A qualitative study in Indian context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13009-:d:686815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.