IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12399-d675799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Bridge Designs Involving UHPFRC

Author

Listed:
  • Numa Bertola

    (Laboratory for Maintenance and Safety of Structures, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Station 18, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Célia Küpfer

    (Structural Xploration Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Passage du Cardinal 13b, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland)

  • Edgar Kälin

    (Ingenieurbüro Edgar Kälin AG, Werner-Kälin-Strasse 7, 8840 Einsiedeln, Switzerland)

  • Eugen Brühwiler

    (Laboratory for Maintenance and Safety of Structures, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Station 18, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Cementitious Composite (UHPFRC) has been developed to design lightweight structures and enhance existing designs. As the environmental footprint of the construction industry must be significantly reduced, the potential to lower environmental impacts of structures using UHPFRC needs to be explored. While the greenhouse gas emissions of a volume of UHPFRC are higher than that of the same volume of concrete, UHPFRC enables the reduction in the amount of material required in structural designs and improves the durability of structures. The environmental impacts of structural designs must thus be compared on the cradle-to-grave use cycle of the design at a project scale. In this study, a methodology is proposed to evaluate the ecological burdens of several bridge designs involving various structural elements in UHPFRC. The method proposes an analysis over three time horizons: first, the construction phase, then including the scheduled maintenance, and finally, adding the elimination. A case study of a short-span bridge in Switzerland is used to assess three alternatives of bridge designs: a conventional reinforced-concrete structure, a composite timber–UHPFRC bridge, and a full-UHPFRC solution. The results show that timber–UHPFRC structures can significantly reduce the environmental impacts of bridge designs, showing promising results in terms of sustainable development. The use of the methodology supports bridge owners in assessing the environmental impacts of structural designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Numa Bertola & Célia Küpfer & Edgar Kälin & Eugen Brühwiler, 2021. "Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Bridge Designs Involving UHPFRC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12399-:d:675799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2018. "An Optimization-LCA of a Prestressed Concrete Precast Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Svetlana Pushkar & Yuri Ribakov, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Strengthening Pre-Stressed Normal-Strength Concrete Beams with Different Steel-Fibered Concrete Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Amir Hajiesmaeili & Francesco Pittau & Emmanuel Denarié & Guillaume Habert, 2019. "Life Cycle Analysis of Strengthening Existing RC Structures with R-PE-UHPFRC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Sarah Pamenter & Rupert J. Myers, 2021. "Decarbonizing the cementitious materials cycle: A whole‐systems review of measures to decarbonize the cement supply chain in the UK and European contexts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 359-376, April.
    5. Tom B. J. Coenen & João Santos & Sonja A. A. M. Fennis & Johannes I. M. Halman, 2021. "Development of a bridge circularity assessment framework to promote resource efficiency in infrastructure projects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 288-304, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Can Mark Bittner & Vincent Oettel, 2022. "Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Natural Plant Fibers—Investigations on the Application of Bamboo Fibers in Ultra-High Performance Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Masanet & Niko Heeren & Shigemi Kagawa & Jonathan Cullen & Reid Lifset & Richard Wood, 2021. "Material efficiency for climate change mitigation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 254-259, April.
    2. Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Madeleine Aguilar-Morocho & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Ahmad Jrade & Farnaz Jalaei & Jieying Jane Zhang & Saeed Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa & Farzad Jalaei, 2023. "Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Anastasiades, K. & Blom, J. & Buyle, M. & Audenaert, A., 2020. "Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learnt from a critical literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Andrew Chapman & Hidemichi Fujii, 2022. "The Potential Role of Flying Vehicles in Progressing the Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Jagriti Singh & Krishan Kumar Pandey & Anil Kumar & Farheen Naz & Sunil Luthra, 2023. "Drivers, barriers and practices of net zero economy: An exploratory knowledge based supply chain multi-stakeholder perspective framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1059-1090, September.
    7. Daniel Costa Reis & Marco Quattrone & Jhonathan F. T. Souza & Katia R. G. Punhagui & Sergio A. Pacca & Vanderley M. John, 2021. "Potential CO2 reduction and uptake due to industrialization and efficient cement use in Brazil by 2050," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 344-358, April.
    8. Vicent Penadés-Plà & David Martínez-Muñoz & Tatiana García-Segura & Ignacio J. Navarro & Víctor Yepes, 2020. "Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Optimized Post-Tensioned Concrete Road Bridges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Svetlana Pushkar & Yuri Ribakov, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Strengthening Pre-Stressed Normal-Strength Concrete Beams with Different Steel-Fibered Concrete Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Qi Zhang & Ting Xiang & Wei Zhang & Heming Wang & Jing An & Xiuping Li & Bing Xue, 2022. "Co‐benefits analysis of industrial symbiosis in China's key industries: Case of steel, cement, and power industries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1714-1727, October.
    11. Jan Pešta & Tereza Pavlů & Kristina Fořtová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Sustainable Masonry Made from Recycled Aggregates: LCA Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Takuma Watari & Zhi Cao & Sho Hata & Keisuke Nansai, 2022. "Efficient use of cement and concrete to reduce reliance on supply-side technologies for net-zero emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Ignacio J. Navarro & Víctor Yepes & José V. Martí, 2018. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Preventive Strategies Applied to Prestressed Concrete Bridges Exposed to Chlorides," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Izhar Hussain Shah & Sabbie A. Miller & Daqian Jiang & Rupert J. Myers, 2022. "Cement substitution with secondary materials can reduce annual global CO2 emissions by up to 1.3 gigatons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Moacir Kripka & Victor Yepes & Cleovir José Milani, 2019. "Selection of Sustainable Short-Span Bridge Design in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Xiaoming Wang & Xudong Wang & You Dong & Chengshu Wang, 2020. "A Novel Construction Technology for Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Considering Safety and Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12399-:d:675799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.