IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12344-d674943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability as “Value of Cooperatives”—Can (Wine) Cooperatives Use Sustainability as a Driver for a Brand Concept?

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Richter

    (Department of Wine and Beverage Business, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany)

  • Jon H. Hanf

    (Department of Wine and Beverage Business, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany)

Abstract

Similar to the number of agricultural cooperatives in the European Union, the number of German wine cooperatives is decreasing. The main purpose of the wine cooperatives is to support the member businesses with the highest possible payouts for their grapes. Wine cooperatives can fulfil this purpose by implementing a differentiation strategy. On the one hand, brands can be used for differentiation. On the other hand, cooperatives can use particular values in the communication with customers that correspond to the target group’s values. Based on the definition of the International Co-operative Alliance, cooperatives are a sustainable form of enterprise. Therefore, the question arises whether it is possible to use sustainability as a value that corresponds to cooperatives as a form of enterprise as well as to a strong societal value that gains importance. Which role does social capital play in the context of social sustainability? The aim of this paper is to shed light on the understanding of brands, to show which cooperative-specific characteristics might pose a challenge to cooperatives in terms of brand management and to examine the understanding of the sustainability construct as well as sustainable management practices applied by wine cooperatives to date. Two exploratory, qualitative studies have been conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Richter & Jon H. Hanf, 2021. "Sustainability as “Value of Cooperatives”—Can (Wine) Cooperatives Use Sustainability as a Driver for a Brand Concept?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12344-:d:674943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:4:p:683-684 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jos Bijman & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2014. "Farmers' Cooperatives in the Eu: Policies, Strategies, and Organization," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 497-508, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Remigijus Civinskas & Rimantas Stašys & Asta Pancerovienė & Aušra Anužienė, 2023. "Social Cooperative Model Choices in the Socially Unsustainable Environment: Evidence from Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Juan Ramón Ferrer & María‐Carmen García‐Cortijo & Juan‐Sebastián Castillo Valero & Vicente Pinilla & Raúl Serrano, 2024. "Cooperatives and sustainability drivers in the Spanish wine sector. What differences do we find with investor owner firms?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 505-526, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Damien Rousselière, 2019. "A Flexible Approach to Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Comparing the Life Duration for Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Enterprises Using a Bayesian Generalized Additive Discrete Time Survi," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(4), pages 829-855, December.
    3. Feifei Chen & Zhigang Xu & Yufeng Luo, 2023. "False prosperity: Rethinking government support for farmers’ cooperatives in China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 905-920, September.
    4. Hao, Jinghui & Bijman, Jos & Gardebroek, Cornelis & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Huo, Xuexi, 2018. "Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-64.
    5. Franken, Jason & Cook, Michael L., 2022. "Cooperatives’ Role in Farm Risk Management," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322116, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. repec:ags:aaea22:335916 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Thomas Kopp & Ashok K. Mishra, 2022. "Perishability and market power in Nepalese food crop production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 518-540, June.
    8. Ourania Tremma & Achilleas Kontogeorgos & Philippos Karipidis & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "Mapping the Market Segments for the Consumers of Greek Cooperative Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Bismark Addai & Zhao Ding & Abbas Ali Chandio & Prince Fosu & Dennis Asante & Anthony Siaw & Frank Osei Danquah & Bright Asiamah Korankye & Gideon Ntim-Amo, 2021. "The Impact of Cooperative Membership on Fish Farm Households’ Income: The Case of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Figueiredo, Vítor & Franco, Mário, 2018. "Wine cooperatives as a form of social entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence about their impact on society," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 812-821.
    11. Volker BECKMANN & Ilona M. OTTO & Rong TAN, 2015. "Overcoming the legacy of the past? Analyzing the modes of governance used by the Polish agricultural producer groups," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(5), pages 222-233.
    12. Jorge Luis Sánchez‐Navarro & Narciso Arcas‐Lario & Miguel Hernández‐Espallardo, 2024. "Identifying the antecedents of opportunism in agri‐food cooperatives: a comparative analysis between first‐ and second‐tier cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 201-223, March.
    13. Dejsi Qorri & János Felföldi, 2024. "Research Trends in Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives: A Bibliometric Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Piñeiro, Veronica & Martinez-Gomez, Victor & Meliá-Martí, Elena & Coque, Jose-Maria Garcia-Alvarez, 2021. "Cooperatives´ Drivers of Joint Cropland Management," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315007, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    16. Zohra Bouamra, 2020. "Retail alliances in the agricultural and food supply chain," Working Papers hal-02902653, HAL.
    17. Marcelo Ferreira & Clea Macagnan & Daniel Vancin & Ana Toaldo, 2021. "Technical assistance: A determinant of cooperative member loyalty," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 649-668, December.
    18. Erika Ribašauskienė & Diana Šumylė & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Mangirdas Morkunas, 2019. "Evaluating Public Policy Support for Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    20. Mercy Mwambi & Jos Bijman & Patience Mshenga, 2020. "Which type of producer organization is (more) inclusive? Dynamics of farmers’ membership and participation in the decision‐making process," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 213-236, June.
    21. Shaoze Jin & Xiangping Jia & Harvey S. James, 2021. "Risk attitudes within farmer cooperative organizations: Evidence from China's fresh apple industry," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 173-205, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12344-:d:674943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.