IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12183-d672363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Entrepreneurship Services Evolution: Analysis of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Models for Open Data Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Fotis Kitsios

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences, University of Macedonia, GR54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Maria Kamariotou

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences, University of Macedonia, GR54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Evangelos Grigoroudis

    (School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, GR73100 Chania, Greece)

Abstract

Open data hackathons are events where the actors from an ecosystem collaborate to build platforms that will benefit the public, creating a win–win scenario for all of them. Sadly, many digital services produced in hackathons are discarded only by providing access to open data that cannot boost economic benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to create a model that fosters value and entrepreneurship for the open data ecosystem, aiming to develop an economically self-sustained ecosystem. The purpose of this paper is to identify the challenges participants of open data hackathons can face to present a model that will support the improvement of these contests. This paper uses the quadruple/quintuple helix innovation model to drive innovation and entrepreneurship in Thessaloniki’s open data ecosystem to develop applications using open data. The results indicate that, although actors are aware of open data use, a new type of open data ecosystem that creates a win–win scenario between the entities in the open data ecosystem is required. The proposed model implies a full effect that promotes cooperation and networking among the entities in the city’s ecosystem towards achieving the aim of increasing citizens’ quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Fotis Kitsios & Maria Kamariotou & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2021. "Digital Entrepreneurship Services Evolution: Analysis of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Models for Open Data Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12183-:d:672363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias Carayannis & David Campbell, 2011. "Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge ," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(3), pages 327-372, September.
    2. Xueling Li & Jia Shen & Wenjie Ma & Weiyong Zhang, 2016. "The effect of business ties and government ties on new IT venture growth: an empirical examination in China," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 245-261, September.
    3. Joacim Rosenlund & William Hogland & Anders W. Johansson & Jackie Seddon, 2015. "A cross-national environmental cluster collaboration: Shifting between an analytical and management level of the triple helix," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 583-593.
    4. Nicholas Tsounis & Aspasia Vlachvei (ed.), 2017. "Advances in Applied Economic Research," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-48454-9, March.
    5. Joacim Rosenlund & Erik Rosell & William Hogland, 2017. "Overcoming the triple helix boundaries in an environmental research collaboration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 153-162.
    6. Gianluigi Viscusi & Marco Castelli & Carlo Batini, 2014. "Assessing Social Value in Open Data Initiatives: A Framework," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Ilias O. Pappas & Patrick Mikalef & Michail N. Giannakos & John Krogstie & George Lekakos, 2018. "Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 479-491, August.
    8. Khurana, Indu & Dutta, Dev K, 2021. "From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Bryan Campbell, 2010. "Environment And Sustainable Development," CIRANO Papers 2010n-04speciala, CIRANO.
    10. Catherine Beaudry & Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Cohendet, 2021. "Editorial: Innovation policies and practices within innovation ecosystems," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 535-544, May.
    11. Fotis Kitsios & Maria Kamariotou, 2017. "Strategic IT Alignment: Business Performance During Financial Crisis," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Nicholas Tsounis & Aspasia Vlachvei (ed.), Advances in Applied Economic Research, chapter 0, pages 503-525, Springer.
    12. Shukuan Zhao & Yu Sun & Xiaobo Xu, 2016. "Research on open innovation performance: a review," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 279-287, September.
    13. Elias G. Carayannis & David F.J. Campbell, 2010. "Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? : A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Dev," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 41-69, January.
    14. Catherine Beaudry & Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Cohendet, 2021. "Editorial : Innovation policies and practices within innovation ecosystems," Post-Print hal-03243944, HAL.
    15. Fotis Kitsios & Maria Kamariotou & Michael A. Talias, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Decision Support Methods: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Vishanth Weerakkody & Zahir Irani & Kawal Kapoor & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2017. "Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 285-300, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleni N. Arvaniti & Agapi Dima & Chrysostomos D. Stylios & Vagelis G. Papadakis, 2022. "Introducing Research Loop to Achieve Open Innovation for Research Centers in Quintuple Helix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Rob Kim Marjerison & Rongjuan Chen & Yinan Lin, 2021. "The Nexus of Social Cause Interest and Entrepreneurial Mindset: Driving Socioeconomic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Lola Redondo-Rodríguez & Diana C. Pérez-Bustamante Yábar & Eloísa Díaz-Garrido, 2023. "Impact of technological innovation on digital entrepreneurship and the effects on the economy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1501-1526, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    3. Björn Sautter, 2021. "Shaping Digital Ecosystems for Sustainable Production: Assessing the Policy Impact of the 2030 Vision for Industrie 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Peter Björk, 2014. "The DNA of Tourism Service Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 181-202, March.
    5. Elias G. Carayannis & Alexey E. Cherepovitsyn & Alina A. Ilinova, 2017. "Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic zone energy shelf: the Role of the Quintuple Innovation Helix Model," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 456-470, June.
    6. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Yong Kyu Lew & Jeong‐Yang Park, 2021. "The evolution of N‐helix of the regional innovation system: Implications for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 453-464, March.
    8. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2022. "Helix Trilogy: the Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2272-2301, September.
    9. Vladimir Menshikov & Oksana Ruža & Irena Kokina & Iluta Arbidane, 2022. "Entrepreneurial university: topicality of creation, international experience, situation in Latvia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 156-177, June.
    10. David Campbell & Elias Carayannis & Scheherazade Rehman, 2015. "Quadruple Helix Structures of Quality of Democracy in Innovation Systems: the USA, OECD Countries, and EU Member Countries in Global Comparison," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(3), pages 467-493, September.
    11. Elias Carayannis & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2014. "The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(2), pages 212-239, June.
    12. Shantha Indrajith Hikkaduwa Liyanage & Fulu Godfrey Netswera, 2022. "Greening Universities with Mode 3 and Quintuple Helix Model of Innovation–Production of Knowledge and Innovation in Knowledge-Based Economy, Botswana," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1126-1156, June.
    13. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "How To Analyze Bioeconomy?," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(6), December.
    14. Elias G. Carayannis & Stelios Rozakis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2018. "Agri-science to agri-business: the technology transfer dimension," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 837-843, August.
    15. Maria Kamariotou & Fotis Kitsios, 2022. "Bringing Digital Innovation Strategies and Entrepreneurship: The Business Model Canvas in Open Data Ecosystem and Startups," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Inga Ivanova, 2014. "Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: a Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(2), pages 357-369, June.
    17. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Luciano Barcellos-Paula & Iván De la Vega & Anna María Gil-Lafuente, 2021. "The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Elias G. Carayannis & Luca Dezi & Gianluca Gregori & Ernesto Calo, 2022. "Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 926-955, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12183-:d:672363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.