IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12051-d669660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of Railway Fastener Detection Using Image Processing and Augmented Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Praneeth Chandran

    (Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Johnny Asber

    (Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Florian Thiery

    (Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Johan Odelius

    (Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Matti Rantatalo

    (Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

Abstract

The rail fastening system forms an indispensable part of the rail tracks and needs to be periodically inspected to ensure safe, reliable and sustainable rail operations. Automated visual inspection has gained significant importance for fastener inspection in recent years. Position accuracy, robustness, and practical limitations due to the complex environment are some of the major concerns associated with this method. This study investigates the combined use of image processing and deep learning algorithms for detecting missing clamps within a rail fastening system. The images used for this study was acquired during field inspections carried out along the Borlänge-Avesta line in Sweden. The image processing techniques proposed in this study enabled the improvement of the fastener position and removal of redundant information from the fastener images. In addition, image augmentation was carried out to enhance the data set, ensure experimental reliability and replicate practical challenges associated with such visual inspection. Convolutional neural network and ResNet-50 algorithms are used for classification purposes, and both the algorithms achieved over 98% accuracy during training and validation and over 94% accuracy during the test stage. Both the algorithms also maintained a good balance between the precision and recall scores during the test stage. CNN and ResNet-50 algorithms were also tested to analyse their performances when the clamp areas were covered. CNN was able to accurately predict the fastener state up to 70% of clamp area occlusion, and ResNet-50 was able to achieve accurate predictions up to 75% of clamp area occlusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Praneeth Chandran & Johnny Asber & Florian Thiery & Johan Odelius & Matti Rantatalo, 2021. "An Investigation of Railway Fastener Detection Using Image Processing and Augmented Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12051-:d:669660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Manuel Castillo-Mingorance & Miguel Sol-Sánchez & Fernando Moreno-Navarro & María Carmen Rubio-Gámez, 2020. "A Critical Review of Sensors for the Continuous Monitoring of Smart and Sustainable Railway Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaohui Zheng & Yuncheng Luo & Shaoyi Li & Zhaoyong Fan & Xi Li & Jianping Ju & Mingyu Lin & Zijian Wang, 2022. "Rapid Detection of Tools of Railway Works in the Full Time Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Hyunkyu Shin & Yonghan Ahn & Sungho Tae & Heungbae Gil & Mihwa Song & Sanghyo Lee, 2021. "Enhancement of Multi-Class Structural Defect Recognition Using Generative Adversarial Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Lei Kou & Mykola Sysyn & Jianxing Liu & Olga Nabochenko & Yue Han & Dai Peng & Szabolcs Fischer, 2022. "Evolution of Rail Contact Fatigue on Crossing Nose Rail Based on Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Marinella Giunta, 2023. "Trends and Challenges in Railway Sustainability: The State of the Art regarding Measures, Strategies, and Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iryna Bondarenko & Vaidas Lukoševičius & Robertas Keršys & Larysa Neduzha, 2023. "Investigation of Dynamic Processes of Rolling Stock–Track Interaction: Experimental Realization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Zheng Zhou & Kaizhi Dong & Ziwei Fang & Yang Liu, 2022. "A Two-Stage Approach for Damage Diagnosis of Structures Based on a Fully Distributed Strain Mode under Multigain Feedback Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Joana Duarte & Fernanda Rodrigues & Jacqueline Castelo Branco, 2022. "Sensing Technology Applications in the Mining Industry—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Rafael Cardona Huerta & Fernando Moreu & Jose Antonio Lozano Galant, 2021. "Aerial Tramway Sustainable Monitoring with an Outdoor Low-Cost Efficient Wireless Intelligent Sensor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12051-:d:669660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.