IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11805-d664781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Fusion Process of Destination Image Formation: Targeting on Urban Tourism Destination

Author

Listed:
  • Xuhui Zhang

    (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Chen Zhang

    (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yanan Li

    (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Ziyu Xu

    (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Zhenfang Huang

    (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Image has been widely accepted as a combination of perceived elements that are commonly discrete and static ones. ‘Discrete’ means that the elements are treated as separate ones with each other, with no interactions among them. ‘Static’ means that the elements would not be changed into other forms in the process of destination image formation. This study, thinking outside the box, tries to explore destination image formation through perceived elements and take their interactions and corresponding changes into account. Machine learning, as the core of artificial intelligence, is applied for data analysis in this study. Urban tourism destinations are targeted because of their variety and abundance of perceived elements. Data are collected from both interview and questionnaire surveys of tourists. Through several phases of analysis, this study finally finds that perceived elements do interact with each other and change into new forms level by level in tourism destination image formation. Specifically, there are four levels from bottom to top in the whole process of destination image formation, i.e., the individual-landscape layer, compound-atmosphere layer, dual-factor layer, and overall-image layer. In the bottom stage, elements are commonly numerous, separate, and concrete. With the interactive effects of the elements, they integrate with each other and generate some new forms in higher levels, which would be more general and abstract. Based on the findings, the dynamic fusion process and pyramid hierarchy of destination image formation are disclosed. This study explores destination image formation from a new perspective, considering perceived elements within a dynamic, synthetic system, and therefore provides practical insights into destination image construction in a more comprehensive and targeted way.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuhui Zhang & Chen Zhang & Yanan Li & Ziyu Xu & Zhenfang Huang, 2021. "Hierarchical Fusion Process of Destination Image Formation: Targeting on Urban Tourism Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11805-:d:664781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stylidis, Dimitrios & Shani, Amir & Belhassen, Yaniv, 2017. "Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 184-195.
    2. Chen, Ching-Fu & Phou, Sambath, 2013. "A closer look at destination: Image, personality, relationship and loyalty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 269-278.
    3. Kock, Florian & Josiassen, Alexander & Assaf, A. George, 2016. "Advancing destination image: The destination content model," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 28-44.
    4. Martín-Santana, Josefa D. & Beerli-Palacio, Asunción & Nazzareno, Patrizio A., 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of destination image gap," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 13-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiqi Liu & Xiaolan Tang & Ka Li, 2022. "Do Historic Landscape Images Predict Tourists’ Spatio-Temporal Behavior at Heritage Sites? A Case Study of West Lake in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Shan Jiang & Noel Scott & Li Tao & Shiqi Xiong & Yuan Qin, 2023. "Perceived Destination Image Cohesion: A Comparison Study of Attractions on the Grand Canal, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardoso, Lucília & Dias, Francisco & de Araújo, Arthur Filipe & Andrés Marques, Maria Isabel, 2019. "A destination imagery processing model: Structural differences between dream and favourite destinations," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 81-94.
    2. Feng Xu & Wenxia Niu & Shuaishuai Li & Yuli Bai, 2020. "The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    3. Ralf Buckley & Mary-Ann Cooper, 2021. "Assortative Matching of Tourists and Destinations: Agents or Algorithms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Glückstad, Fumiko Kano & Schmidt, Mikkel N. & Mørup, Morten, 2020. "Testing a model of destination image formation: Application of Bayesian relational modelling and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 351-363.
    5. Rich Harrill & Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos & Marysol Castillo-Palacio & Lina Marcela Padilla-Delgado, 2023. "An Exploratory Attitude and Belief Analysis of Ecotourists’ Destination Image Assessments and Behavioral Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Cheon Yu & Yun Seop Hwang, 2019. "Do the Social Responsibility Efforts of the Destination Affect the Loyalty of Tourists?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Qi Chu & Guang Bao & Jiayu Sun, 2022. "Progress and Prospects of Destination Image Research in the Last Decade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Feng Xu & Xuejiao Lin & Shuaishuai Li & Wenxia Niu, 2018. "Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Soo K. Kang, 2019. "Place Attachment, Image, and Support for Marijuana Tourism in Colorado," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    11. Molinillo, Sebastian & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2018. "DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 116-130.
    12. Xesfingi, Sofia & Papadopoulou, Georgia & Karamanis, Dimitrios & Martens, Hanno M., 2018. "Visitors’ satisfaction in Dubai and pre-trip destination image," MPRA Paper 89850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Beykan Çizel & İsmail Gökay Kırtıl & Volkan Aşkun & Edina Ajanovic & Hatice Karakaş, 2022. "Symmetric and asymmetric analysis of tourist behavioral intention's antecedents," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4599-4622, December.
    14. Hailong Wu & Takamitsu Jimura, 2019. "Exploring an Importance–Performance Analysis approach to evaluate destination image," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(7), pages 699-717, November.
    15. Seo, Kwanglim & Choi, Youngjoon & Shin, Joongwon, 2021. "Homelessness in destinations: Tourists' visit intention," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Sanja Kovačić & Tamara Jovanović & Miroslav D. Vujičić & Alastair M. Morrison & James Kennell, 2022. "What Shapes Activity Preferences? The Role of Tourist Personality, Destination Personality and Destination Image: Evidence from Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    17. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    18. Yağmur, Yenal & Aksu, Akın, 2022. "Investigation of destination image mediating effect on tourists’ risk assessment, behavioural intentions and satisfaction," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 27-37.
    19. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Ratul Kumar Saha & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "How does tourist perception lead to tourist hesitation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3659-3686, March.
    20. Isaac Taberner & Albert Juncà, 2021. "Small-Scale Sport Events as Place Branding Platforms: A Content Analysis of Osona’s Projected Destination Image through Event-Related Pictures on Instagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11805-:d:664781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.