IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i1p423-d474934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical Approach to Quantitative Country Risk Assessment for the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaman Li

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    UIBE Belt & Road Energy Trade and Development Center, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Xiucheng Dong

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    UIBE Belt & Road Energy Trade and Development Center, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Qingzhe Jiang

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    UIBE Belt & Road Energy Trade and Development Center, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Kangyin Dong

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    UIBE Belt & Road Energy Trade and Development Center, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) promoted by the Chinese government has attracted a significant amount of international trade and transnational investment and other businesses. Accordingly, country risk assessment should be granted priority in the decision-making process for these projects. Based on a comprehensive consideration of important relevant countries and the availability of data of countries along the BRI, this paper uses data from 49 countries along the BRI between 2014–2019 and establishes a national risk-evaluation system for the BRI from four dimensions (i.e., political, economic, social, and investment). This paper adopts the Grey correlation analysis based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Grey-TOPSIS) method to identify and evaluate the risk of countries along the BRI. Geographic Information System (GIS) maps are drawn according to the criteria for classifying the five risk levels to show the rank of the four aspects of risk scores along the BRI in 2019 and the rank of overall country risk scores during the period 2014–2019. The proposed conclusion and policy implications can help the Chinese government and companies to make informed decisions and minimize potential risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaman Li & Xiucheng Dong & Qingzhe Jiang & Kangyin Dong, 2021. "Analytical Approach to Quantitative Country Risk Assessment for the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:423-:d:474934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeGhetto, Kaitlyn & Lamont, Bruce T. & Holmes, R. Michael, 2020. "Safety risk and international investment decisions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    2. Zhao, Yabo & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing, 2019. "Energy relations between China and the countries along the Belt and Road: An analysis of the distribution of energy resources and interdependence relationships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 133-144.
    3. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Murray, Siobhan & Rocha, Nadia & Ruta, Michele, 2019. "How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-164.
    4. Yu, Shu & Qian, Xingwang & Liu, Taoxiong, 2019. "Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms' outward foreign direct investment," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    5. Du, Julan & Zhang, Yifei, 2018. "Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 189-205.
    6. Wenjie Chen & David Dollar & Heiwai Tang, 2018. "Why Is China Investing in Africa? Evidence from the Firm Level," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 32(3), pages 610-632.
    7. Sun, Yu & Chen, Lizhen & Sun, Huaping & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2020. "Low-carbon financial risk factor correlation in the belt and road PPP project," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    8. Dang, Linjing & Zhao, Jingfeng, 2020. "Cultural risk and management strategy for Chinese enterprises' overseas investment," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Li, Jiatao & Liu, Bin & Qian, Gongming, 2019. "The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 350-359.
    10. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alin Opreana & Simona Vinerean & Diana Marieta Mihaiu & Liliana Barbu & Radu-Alexandru Șerban, 2023. "Fuzzy Analytic Network Process with Principal Component Analysis to Establish a Bank Performance Model under the Assumption of Country Risk," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-38, July.
    2. Shuchao Wang & Peishu Chen & Weicai Peng, 2023. "Environmental assessment of regional cooperative elderly care: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3979-4007, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiatao Li & Ari Van Assche & Xiaolan Fu & Lee Li & Gongming Qian, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative and international business policy: A kaleidoscopic perspective," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 135-151, June.
    2. Jiang, Qichuan & Ma, Xuejiao & Wang, Yun, 2021. "How does the one belt one road initiative affect the green economic growth?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Wei Yang & Feihuang Xue & Jinfeng Shi & Yanmin Shao & Di Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Trade Dependence Relationship of Asian Countries with China: Implications for China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Zhai, Wei, 2023. "Risk assessment of China's foreign direct investment in "One Belt, One Road": Taking the green finance as a research perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    5. Nugent, Jeffrey B. & Lu, Jiaxuan, 2021. "China's outward foreign direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative: What are the motives for Chinese firms to invest?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Zhou, Na & Wu, Qiaosheng & Hu, Xiangping & Xu, Deyi & Wang, Xiaolin, 2020. "Evaluation of Chinese natural gas investment along the Belt and Road Initiative using super slacks-based measurement of efficiency method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Bega, François, 2021. "China's Belt & Road Initiative coal power cooperation: Transitioning toward low-carbon development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Dong, Yan & Fan, Cijun, 2020. "The role of China's aid and ODI in the economic growth of African countries," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    9. Benye Shi & Tian Cai, 2020. "Has China’s Oil Investment in Belt and Road Initiative Countries Helped Its Oil Import?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    11. Yang Gao, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative and cascading innovation in China’s domestic railway ecosystem," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 236-258, June.
    12. Chaonan Lu & Litao Duan & Geng Peng & Benfu Lv, 2020. "The Promotion Effect of the Belt and Road Initiative on China’s Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm Level," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(11), pages 1220-1231, November.
    13. Amar Anwar & Ichiro Iwasaki, 2022. "Institutions and FDI from BRICS countries: a meta-analytic review," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 417-468, July.
    14. Sha, Yezhou & Song, Weijia, 2021. "Can Bitcoin hedge Belt and Road equity markets?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    15. Yang, Dong & Li, Lu & Notteboom, Theo, 2022. "Chinese investment in overseas container terminals: The role of investor attributes in achieving a higher port competitiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 112-122.
    16. Koffi Dumor & Li Yao, 2019. "Estimating China’s Trade with Its Partner Countries within the Belt and Road Initiative Using Neural Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Filip Beule & Haiyan Zhang, 2022. "The impact of government policy on Chinese investment locations: An analysis of the Belt and Road policy announcement, host-country agreement, and sentiment," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 194-217, June.
    18. Kaku Attah Damoah & Giorgia Giovannetti & Enrico Marvasi, 2023. "Five Stylized Facts on Belt and Road Countries and Their Trade Patterns," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(1), pages 149-181, January.
    19. Jakub Horak, 2021. "Sanctions as a Catalyst for Russia’s and China’s Balance of Trade: Business Opportunity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Zhao, Zhibo & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhao, Lingdi & Zhang, Jinggu, 2020. "Extending production-theoretical decomposition analysis to environmentally sensitive growth: Case study of Belt and Road Initiative countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:423-:d:474934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.