IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10093-d632018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting the Balance among the ‘Three Rs of Sustainability:’ What Motivates Reducing and Reusing?

Author

Listed:
  • Carrie M. Leslie

    (Sociology Department, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Alva I. Strand

    (Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
    Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
    Corix Plains Institute, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Elizabeth A. Ross

    (Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Giovanni Tolentino Ramos

    (Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Eli S. Bridge

    (Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Phillip B. Chilson

    (School of Meteorology & Atmospheric Radar Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Christopher E. Anderson

    (Communication Department, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

Abstract

The “Three Rs of Sustainability—Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,” are central tenets of many community waste-management programs promoting responsible use of natural resources and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, recycling has become widespread, but monetary and energy expenditures required to transport and transform waste materials have led to downsizing of recycling programs globally and in the U.S. This trend increases the need for effective reducing and reusing practices as alternatives to recycling. Using a survey experiment to examine motivations that underlie reducing and reusing behaviors, individuals reported their current reducing, reusing, and recycling practices. Respondents then were provided with three hypothetical scenarios that described (1) an external waste-management threat to public well-being, (2) social/peer pressure from family and friends towards sustainable decision-making, and (3) increased convenience of reusing and reducing practices. These messages reflect previously identified RRR motivations. After the scenarios, the questions regarding recycling, reducing, and reusing behavior were presented again to test for changes in the responses. All three scenarios were effective in increasing intended reducing and reusing behavior. The threat scenario was slightly more effective than the others, particularly among individuals who reported behavior with considerable recycling practices but not as much reducing and reusing.

Suggested Citation

  • Carrie M. Leslie & Alva I. Strand & Elizabeth A. Ross & Giovanni Tolentino Ramos & Eli S. Bridge & Phillip B. Chilson & Christopher E. Anderson, 2021. "Shifting the Balance among the ‘Three Rs of Sustainability:’ What Motivates Reducing and Reusing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10093-:d:632018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grolemund, Garrett & Wickham, Hadley, 2011. "Dates and Times Made Easy with lubridate," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i03).
    2. Klara Wenzel & Elisabeth Süßbauer, 2021. "Exploring Domestic Precycling Behavior: A Social Identity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    3. Wickham, Hadley, 2011. "The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack Sutton & Golnaz Shahtahmassebi & Haroldo V Ribeiro & Quentin S Hanley, 2022. "Population density and spreading of COVID-19 in England and Wales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Kayla A. Cotterman & Anthony D. Kendall & Bruno Basso & David W. Hyndman, 2018. "Groundwater depletion and climate change: future prospects of crop production in the Central High Plains Aquifer," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 187-200, January.
    3. Laha, A. K. & Putatunda, Sayan, 2017. "Travel Time Prediction for Taxi-GPS Data Streams," IIMA Working Papers WP 2017-03-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Dolejš Martin & Forejt Michal, 2019. "Franziscean cadastre in landscape structure research: a systematic review," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 131-144, March.
    5. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-François & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Michael A Ruderman & Deirdra F Wilson & Savanna Reid, 2015. "Does Prison Crowding Predict Higher Rates of Substance Use Related Parole Violations? A Recurrent Events Multi-Level Survival Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Loke Schmalensee & Pauline Caillault & Katrín Hulda Gunnarsdóttir & Karl Gotthard & Philipp Lehmann, 2023. "Seasonal specialization drives divergent population dynamics in two closely related butterflies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Ravic Nijbroek & Kristin Piikki & Mats Söderström & Bas Kempen & Katrine G. Turner & Simeon Hengari & John Mutua, 2018. "Soil Organic Carbon Baselines for Land Degradation Neutrality: Map Accuracy and Cost Tradeoffs with Respect to Complexity in Otjozondjupa, Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Merl, Robert & Stöckl, Thomas & Palan, Stefan, 2023. "Insider trading regulation and shorting constraints. Evaluating the joint effects of two market interventions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Miller, Christine M.F. & Waterhouse, Hannah & Harter, Thomas & Fadel, James G. & Meyer, Deanne, 2020. "Quantifying the uncertainty in nitrogen application and groundwater nitrate leaching in manure based cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Sarlas, Georgios & Páez, Antonio & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. repec:irf:wpaper:010 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Marin FOTACHE & Florin DUMITRU & Valerica GREAVU-SERBAN, 2015. "An Information Systems Master Programme in Romania. Some Commonalities and Specificities," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 5-18.
    14. Martijn Van Heel & Dinska Van Gucht & Koen Vanbrabant & Frank Baeyens, 2017. "The Importance of Conditioned Stimuli in Cigarette and E-Cigarette Craving Reduction by E-Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Sean McKenzie & Hilary Parkinson & Jane Mangold & Mary Burrows & Selena Ahmed & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Perceptions, Experiences, and Priorities Supporting Agroecosystem Management Decisions Differ among Agricultural Producers, Consultants, and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Tom Broekel, 2021. "Still in the shadow of the wall? The case of the Berlin biotechnology cluster," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 73-94, February.
    17. Verena K. Brändle & Olga Eisele, 2023. "A Thin Line: Governmental Border Communication in Times of European Crises," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 597-615, May.
    18. Andee J. Kaplan & Eric R. Hare, 2019. "Putting down roots: a graphical exploration of community attachment," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1449-1464, December.
    19. Ahmad Alsaber & Jiazhu Pan & Adeeba Al-Herz & Dhary S. Alkandary & Adeeba Al-Hurban & Parul Setiya & on behalf of the KRRD Group, 2020. "Influence of Ambient Air Pollution on Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Score Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Kane, Michael & Emerson, John W. & Weston, Stephen, 2013. "Scalable Strategies for Computing with Massive Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 55(i14).
    21. Haunschild, Robin & Bornmann, Lutz, 2023. "Which papers cited which tweets? An exploratory analysis based on Scopus data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10093-:d:632018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.