IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9298-d617233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Flipped Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: An Experiential Learning Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Chih Chen

    (Department of Information Management, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 30401, Taiwan)

Abstract

This article explores the flipped-classroom learning cycle and traditional blended-learning cycle from the experiential learning-theory perspective, according to which we proposed three teaching strategies: high-flipped classroom (high-FC), low-flipped classroom (low-FC), and Traditional Blended Learning (traditional BL). And, the three teaching strategies are adopted in the course of Enterprise Resource Planning System. The purpose is to investigate the effects of learning outcomes and satisfaction among high-FC, traditional BL, and low-FC. This research adopts a quasi-experimental method. The sample for the study is a compulsory course of the Information Management Department of the University of Science and Technology in Taiwan, with a total of 94 students in two classes. There are several research conclusions. (1) The three groups of t test results found that there are significant differences in the learning outcomes of the system skills. high-FC is better than low-FC, low-FC is better than traditional BL, and high-FC is better than traditional BL. However, there are no significant differences in the learning outcomes of process knowledge. (2) The results of ANOVA testing showed that students have the highest perceived learning outcomes for high-FC, followed by low-FC and traditional BL. (3) The results of ANOVA testing showed that students have the highest perceived learning satisfaction in high-FC, followed by low-FC, and the lowest is traditional BL. (4) The t test result shows that students are more satisfied with preview e-learning than review e-learning. The study findings provide several implications. (1) It is feasible to implement flipped classrooms from the perspective of experiential-learning theory. (2) Fully flipped classrooms have practical difficulties. A partially flipped classroom (high-FC or low-FC) can be a feasible gradual strategy. (3) Flipped classrooms and e-learning support each other’s sustainable development. (4) The flipped classroom based on experiential learning theoretical perspective has obtained preliminary verification in the ERP-system course.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Chih Chen, 2021. "Effects of Flipped Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: An Experiential Learning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9298-:d:617233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    2. Li Zhao & Xiaohong Liu & Yu-Sheng Su, 2021. "The Differentiate Effect of Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Satisfaction on Pre-Service Teacher Students’ Learning Achievement in a Flipped Classroom: A Case of a Modern Educational Technology Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Hasnan Baber, 2020. "Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcome and Satisfaction in Online Learning during the Pandemic of COVID19," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(3), pages 285-292.
    4. Tina Beranič & Marjan Heričko, 2019. "Introducing ERP Concepts to IT Students Using an Experiential Learning Approach with an Emphasis on Reflection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Jian & Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Qingchun Yu, 2022. "Key Factors Affecting Mathematics Teachers’ Well-Being and Stress Levels: An Extended Engagement Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & Celia Carrillo & María del Camino Escolar Llamazares & Sandra Rodríguez Arribas & Diego Serrano Gómez, 2022. "Nursing Students’ Perceived Satisfaction with Flipped Learning Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Nevenka Popović Šević & Marko Ranković & Dušan Stojaković & Milutin Dobrilović, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Teaching Process in Higher Education in the Republic of Serbia during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Alina Mihaela Dima & Mihail Busu & Vanesa Madalina Vargas, 2022. "The mediating role of students’ ability to adapt to online activities on the relationship between perceived university culture and academic performance," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1253-1281, December.
    5. Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Zdenko Deželak & Silvia Parusheva & Samo Bobek, 2022. "Attractiveness of Collaborative Platforms for Sustainable E-Learning in Business Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Dabija, Dan-Cristian & Brătianu, Constantin & Dominici, Gandolfo & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Unveiling e-learning and knowledge sharing during the pandemic: From expert skills perception to student satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan & Nour Awni Albelbisi & Omar Hujran & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Ali Alkhalifah, 2021. "Developing a Holistic Success Model for Sustainable E-Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Peter Mikek, 2023. "A Flipped Classroom Experiment in Growth Theory," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 433-456, June.
    9. Jiying Han & Xiaohui Geng & Qinxiang Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Tang, Tommy, 2023. "Approach to learning for assessment in economics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 571-584.
    11. Syaiful Hifni, 2021. "Contingency E-Learning for Accounting: Effective Communication in the New Normal Era," GATR Journals afr205, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Azira Hanani Ab Rahman & Nur Syafiqah A. Samad & Azwan Abdullah & Mohd Rushdan Yasoa’ & Siti Fariha Muhamad & Norzalizah Bahari & Siti Rohana Mohamad, 2022. "E-Learning and Sustainability of Pondok Schools: A Case Study on Post-COVID-19 E-Learning Implementation among Students of Pondok Sungai Durian, Kelantan, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Amanda M. Y. Chu & Connie K. W. Liu & Mike K. P. So & Benson S. Y. Lam, 2021. "Factors for Sustainable Online Learning in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Nikou, Shahrokh & Kim, Seongcheol & Lim, Chulmin & Maslov, Ilia, 2021. "Satisfaction with e-Learning Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic – A Comparative Study," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238042, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Andrianto Widjaja & Yosua Giovanni Widjaja, 2022. "The influence of interaction, learner characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived satisfaction on continuance intention in e-learning system," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 381-390, March.
    16. Merfat Ayesh Alsubaie & Layla Nasser Alzarah & Fatmah Abdulrahman Alhemly, 2022. "Faculty Members’ Attitudes and Practices: How They Responded to Forced Adoption of Distance Education?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    17. Juan Luis Martín Ayala & Sergio Castaño Castaño & Alba Hernández Santana & Mariacarla Martí González & Julién Brito Ballester, 2021. "Impact of Learning in the COVID-19 Era on Academic Outcomes of Undergraduate Psychology Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Hala Dalbani & Safaa Eissa & Sharifah Fatimah Syed-Ahmad & Norah Almusharraf, 2022. "Transitioning to Flipped Classrooms: Instructors’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Cosgrove, Sarah B. & Olitsky, Neal H., 2020. "Research-based instructional strategies in a flipped principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    20. Aida Mammadova & Nazam Ali & Krisada Chaiyasarn, 2022. "Can Online Learning about UNESCO Biosphere Reserves Change the Perception on SDGs and Different Aspects of Sustainability between Japanese and International Students?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9298-:d:617233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.