IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7904-d594771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Spasiano

    (Water Resources Research and Documentation Center, University for Foreigners of Perugia, Piazza Fortebraccio, 4, 06123 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, University of Tuscia, Via del Paradiso, 47, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Salvatore Grimaldi

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, snc, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Alessio Maria Braccini

    (Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, University of Tuscia, Via del Paradiso, 47, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Fernando Nardi

    (Water Resources Research and Documentation Center, University for Foreigners of Perugia, Piazza Fortebraccio, 4, 06123 Perugia, Italy
    Institute of Environment and College of Arts, Science and Education (CASE), Florida International University (FIU), 11200 SW 8th Street, CASE 450, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

This work intends to lay the foundations for a theoretical framework of citizen science combining social and organizational implications with the support of information technologies. The proposed theoretical framework moves towards a shared and common research process between experts and citizens to deal with environmental and social challenges. The role and capacity of online communities is explored and their engagement capacity by means of web-based digital platforms supporting crowdsourcing activities. In this contribution, authors highlight the most common practices, methods and issues of citizen science approaches adopted from multidisciplinary application fields to obtain insights for designing a new participative approach for organizational studies. To reach this goal, authors illustrate the results of a systematic meta-review analysis, consisting of an accurate selection and revision of journal review articles in order to highlight concepts, methods, research design approaches and tools adopted in citizen science approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Spasiano & Salvatore Grimaldi & Alessio Maria Braccini & Fernando Nardi, 2021. "Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7904-:d:594771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Peter & Tim Diekötter & Kerstin Kremer, 2019. "Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Haklay Muki & Jankowski Piotr & Zwoliński Zbigniew, 2018. "Selected Modern Methods and Tools for Public Participation in Urban Planning – A Review," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 127-149, September.
    3. Eleftheria Vasileiadou, 2015. "Crowd science: It is not just a matter of time (or funding)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(7), pages 1514-1517, July.
    4. Schröter, Matthias & Kraemer, Roland & Mantel, Martin & Kabisch, Nadja & Hecker, Susanne & Richter, Anett & Neumeier, Veronika & Bonn, Aletta, 2017. "Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 80-94.
    5. Corrine Nöel Knapp & Robin S. Reid & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Julia A. Klein & Kathleen A. Galvin, 2019. "Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Bianca E. Lopez & Nicholas R. Magliocca & Andrew T. Crooks, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media Data for Socio-Environmental Systems Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela De Filippo & María Luisa Lascurain & Andres Pandiella-Dominique & Elias Sanz-Casado, 2020. "Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2020. "Agent-Based Modeling for Integrating Human Behavior into the Food–Energy–Water Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Wessel Ganzevoort & Riyan J. G. van den Born, 2021. "Counting Bees: Learning Outcomes from Participation in the Dutch National Bee Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Bing Mei & Shuxia Yang, 2019. "Nurturing Environmental Education at the Tertiary Education Level in China: Can Mobile Augmented Reality and Gamification Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Pires, Aliny P.F. & Amaral, Aryanne G. & Padgurschi, Maíra C.G. & Joly, Carlos A. & Scarano, Fabio R., 2018. "Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 68-73.
    6. Allan D. Hollander & Casey W. Hoy & Kevin S. Armstrong & Michael R. Dimock & Patrick R. Huber & Douglas Jackson-Smith & James F. Quinn & Courtney M. Riggle & Thomas P. Tomich, 2023. "Workflows for Knowledge Co-Production—Meat and Dairy Processing in Ohio and Northern California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Xiaoxu Liang & Naisi Hua & John Martin & Elena Dellapiana & Cristina Coscia & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Social Media as a Medium to Promote Local Perception Expression in China’s World Heritage Sites," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Seymour, Valentine & Willls, Betheney & Wilkin, Paul & Burt, Peter & Ikin, Ed & Stevenson, Philip C., 2022. "Incorporating citizen science to advance the Natural Capital approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Willemen, Louise, 2020. "It’s about time: Advancing spatial analyses of ecosystem services and their application," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Stefania Santoro & Pasquale Balena & Domenico Camarda, 2020. "Knowledge Models for Spatial Planning: Ecosystem Services Awareness in the New Plan of Bari (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Evans, D.L. & Falagán, N. & Hardman, C.A. & Kourmpetli, S. & Liu, L. & Mead, B.R. & Davies, J.A.C., 2022. "Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure – a systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Laura Christ & Marie Hahn & Anne-Kathrin Sieg & Daniel C. Dreesmann, 2022. "Be(e) Engaged! How Students Benefit from an Educational Citizen Science Project on Biodiversity in Their Biology Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Agathe Colléony & Assaf Shwartz, 2019. "Beyond Assuming Co-Benefits in Nature-Based Solutions: A Human-Centered Approach to Optimize Social and Ecological Outcomes for Advancing Sustainable Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Francesco Di Grazia & Bruna Gumiero & Luisa Galgani & Elena Troiani & Michele Ferri & Steven A. Loiselle, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions with the Help of Citizen Scientists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Roderick J. Lawrence, 2022. "Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 61-74.
    16. Jiří Schneider & Hana Kubíčková, 2020. "The State of the Art of Use of the Concept of Ecosystem Services within Spatial Plans in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Baptiste Bedessem & Lucie Morère & Louise Roblin & Anne Dozières & Anne-Caroline Prévot, 2022. "Participatory Biodiversity Governance: A Comparison of Two French Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Kim, Ilkwon & Lee, Jae-hyuck & Kwon, Hyuksoo, 2021. "Participatory ecosystem service assessment to enhance environmental decision-making in a border city of South Korea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Alejandro Huertas Herrera & Mónica Toro Manríquez & Rosina Soler & Cristian Lorenzo & María Vanessa Lencinas & Guillermo Martínez Pastur, 2021. "Assessing Socio-ecological Systems Using Social Media Data: An Approach for Forested Landscapes in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 817-839, October.
    20. Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis, 2021. "Environmental Citizen Science Initiatives as a Springboard towards the Education for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7904-:d:594771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.