IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7768-d592730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shade-Grown Coffee in Colombia Benefits Soil Hydraulic Conductivity

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Esteban Lozano-Baez

    (Department of Biology, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia 081001, Colombia)

  • Yamileth Domínguez-Haydar

    (Department of Biology, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia 081001, Colombia)

  • Simone Di Prima

    (Agricultural Department, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Miguel Cooper

    (Luiz de Queiroz School of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba 13418-900, Brazil)

  • Mirko Castellini

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Secondary tropical forests and coffee agroforestry systems contain fewer trees than native forests but can positively impact soil hydrological functions, such as water infiltration compared to the pasture land that they replace. However, for both land uses it remains in how far the soil hydraulic characteristics are comparable to that of native forest. Therefore, we investigated the saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ) and some hydrophysical soil attributes in four land-use types: (i) a shade-grown coffee; (ii) a natural regenerated forest 15 years ago; (iii) a pasture; and (iv) a reference forest, in the municipality of La Jagua de Ibirico, César department, Colombia. We determined historical land use and conducted soil sampling, using the Beerkan method to determine the K s values. We also measured canopy cover, vegetation height, diameter at breast height and total number of trees in the forest covers. Our results indicate that K s values were similar for the coffee and the reference forest, reflecting the positive effect of trees on soil hydrological functioning in agroforestry systems. Our results suggest that 15 years of forest regeneration after land abandonment in Sub-Andean Forest, can improve the soil hydraulic attributes. Additionally, soil water repellency was observed for the reference forest soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Esteban Lozano-Baez & Yamileth Domínguez-Haydar & Simone Di Prima & Miguel Cooper & Mirko Castellini, 2021. "Shade-Grown Coffee in Colombia Benefits Soil Hydraulic Conductivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7768-:d:592730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Brenda B. & Richards, Paul L., 2007. "Soil random roughness and depression storage on coffee farms of varying shade levels," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 194-204, September.
    2. Ibanez, Marcela & Blackman, Allen, 2016. "Is Eco-Certification a Win–Win for Developing Country Agriculture? Organic Coffee Certification in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 14-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takahashi, Ryo, 2021. "How to stimulate environmentally friendly consumption: Evidence from a nationwide social experiment in Japan to promote eco-friendly coffee," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Myoungjin Oh & Jungwoo Shin & Pil‐Ju Park & Sunmee Kim, 2020. "Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3174-3186, December.
    3. Laura M. Pereira & Scott Drimie & Kristi Maciejewski & Patrick Bon Tonissen & Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, 2020. "Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Jorge Sellare & Eva‐Marie Meemken & Christophe Kouamé & Matin Qaim, 2020. "Do Sustainability Standards Benefit Smallholder Farmers Also When Accounting For Cooperative Effects? Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 681-695, March.
    6. Meemken, Eva-Marie & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Toward Improving the Design of Sustainability Standards—A Gendered Analysis of Farmers’ Preferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 285-298.
    7. Meemken, Eva-Marie, 2021. "Large farms, large benefits? Sustainability certification among family farms and agro-industrial producers in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Sellare, Jorge & Meemken, Eva-Marie & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Fairtrade, Agrochemical Input Use, and Effects on Human Health and the Environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Francisco J. André & Jorge A. Valenciano-Salazar, 2020. "Becoming Carbon Neutral in Costa Rica to Be More Sustainable: An AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Christian Grovermann & Sylvain Quiédeville & Adrian Muller & Florian Leiber & Matthias Stolze & Simon Moakes, 2021. "Does organic certification make economic sense for dairy farmers in Europe?–A latent class counterfactual analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 1001-1012, November.
    11. Giuliani, Elisa & Ciravegna, Luciano & Vezzulli, Andrea & Kilian, Bernard, 2017. "Decoupling Standards from Practice: The Impact of In-House Certifications on Coffee Farms’ Environmental and Social Conduct," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 294-314.
    12. Ryo Takahashi, 2019. "How to stimulate environmentally friendly consumption: Evidence from a nationwide social experiment to promote eco-friendly coffee," Working Papers 1917, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    13. Johanna Gather & Meike Wollni, 2022. "Setting the standard: Does Rainforest Alliance Certification increase environmental and socio‐economic outcomes for small‐scale coffee producers in Rwanda?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1807-1825, December.
    14. Marola, Elena & Schöpfner, Judith & Gallemore, Caleb & Jespersen, Kristjan, 2020. "The bandwidth problem in telecoupled systems governance: Certifying sustainable winemaking in Australia and Chile," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Marco Campera & Budiadi Budiadi & Esther Adinda & Nabil Ahmad & Michela Balestri & Katherine Hedger & Muhammad Ali Imron & Sophie Manson & Vincent Nijman & K.A.I. Nekaris, 2021. "Fostering a Wildlife-Friendly Program for Sustainable Coffee Farming: The Case of Small-Holder Farmers in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    16. J Nicolas Hernandez‐Aguilera & Miguel I Gómez & Amanda D Rodewald & Ximena Rueda & Colleen Anunu & Ruth Bennett & Harold M van Es, 2018. "Quality as a Driver of Sustainable Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of the Relationship Coffee Model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 179-198, February.
    17. Niklas, Britta, 2024. "The effect of South African wine certifications on price premiums and marginal costs: A two-stage hedonic approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Meemken, Eva-Marie & Spielman, David J. & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 74-85.
    19. Ruifeng Liu & Zhifeng Gao & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Lijia Shi & Les Oxley & Hengyun Ma, 2020. "Can “green food” certification achieve both sustainable practices and economic benefits in a transitional economy? The case of kiwifruit growers in Henan Province, China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 675-692, October.
    20. Vu, Ha Thu & Tran, Duc & Goto, Daisaku & Kawata, Keisuke, 2020. "Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7768-:d:592730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.