IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6856-d576786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Varietal Selection for Promising Rice Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Vina Eka Aristya

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
    Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology of Central Java, Ministry of Agriculture, Bergas, Semarang, Central Java 50552, Indonesia)

  • Y. Andi Trisyono

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Taryono Taryono

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
    Agrotechnology Innovation Centre, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Berbah, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55573, Indonesia)

Abstract

The purpose of rice breeding is to create varieties that are well adapted, highly productive, and acceptable to farmers. However, rice productivity is limited as a result of combined biotic stresses (pests/diseases). This study combines assessment by farmers with the evaluation by breeders with respect to promising rice lines within a range of environments. The aim is to investigate farmers’ preferences and to characterize the yield of promising rice lines, as well as their resistance to pests/diseases by consulting 120 farmers and breeders. This study used an oversite design replicated three times with thirteen promising lines and two varieties, which were all evaluated at farmers’ fields between December 2019 and May 2020. The Importance Performance Analysis was used to compare line performance and farmers’ expectations. Lines Gamapadi-2 and Gamapadi-4 had the highest acceptability scores based on the farmers’ preferences. The yield performances were evaluated using the Finlay–Wilkinson test and the genotypes were evaluated using environmental models (GGE biplot) to determine the most stable lines to be recommended for large-scale planting. The Finlay–Wilkinson and GGE biplot conclusion analyses also showed that the Gamapadi-2 and Gamapadi-4 lines exhibited high potential yield and stability, as well as indications of specific advantages. The results for both lines in all locations indicated no symptoms of brown planthoppers or bacterial leaf blight due to its absence during the field research. These lines in all age ranges at two sites showed no symptoms of leaf blast.

Suggested Citation

  • Vina Eka Aristya & Y. Andi Trisyono & Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo & Taryono Taryono, 2021. "Participatory Varietal Selection for Promising Rice Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6856-:d:576786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    2. Manzanilla, D.O. & Paris, T.R. & Vergara, G.V. & Ismail, A.M. & Pandey, S. & Labios, R.V. & Tatlonghari, G.T. & Acda, R.D. & Chi, T.T.N. & Duoangsila, K. & Siliphouthone, I. & Manikmas, M.O.A. & Macki, 2011. "Submergence risks and farmers' preferences: Implications for breeding Sub1 rice in Southeast Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(4), pages 335-347, April.
    3. Bellon, Mauricio R. & Smale, Melinda & Aguirre, Alfonso & Taba, Suketoshi & Aragon, Flavio & Diaz, Jaime & Castro, Humberto, 2000. "Identifying Appropriate Germplasm For Participatory Breeding: An Example From The Central Valleys Of Oaxaca, Mexico," Economics Working Papers 46524, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary Ng’endo & Julien Nduwimana & Donald Villanueva & Matty Demont, 2023. "How Can Pairing Quantitative With Qualitative Data Collection Methods Better Elicit Rice Varietal Selection? Evidence From Burundi," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Ngcebo C. Mncwango & Corlina M. Van Jaarsveld & Nontuthuko R. Ntuli & Sydney Mavengahama, 2021. "Participatory Selection of Amaranthus Genotypes in the KwaMbonambi Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Simon Alibu & Morish Obura & James Ekebu & Doreen Nampamya & Jimmy Lamo & Godfrey Asea & Tae-Seon Park, 2022. "Modest Ag-Extension and Access to Seeds of Aromatic Rice Can Boost Returns of Smallholder Farmers in Uganda, A Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Zhibin & Vlachos, Ilias, 2018. "An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: A case of air passengers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 185-195.
    2. Pumpe, Andreas & Vallée, Franz, 2015. "The Total Landed Cost Concept. Begging for Answers," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 31-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Laura Grassini & Alessandro Magrini & Enrico Conti, 2023. "Formative-reflective scheme for the assessment of tourism destination competitiveness: an analysis of Italian municipalities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3523-3548, August.
    5. Badstue, Lone B. & Bellon, Mauricio R. & Juarez, Xochitl & Manuel, Irma & Solano, Ana M., 2003. "Social Relations And Seed Transactions Among Smallscale Maize Farmers In The Central Valleys Of Oaxaca, Mexico; Preliminary Findings," Economics Working Papers 46551, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    6. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2015. "Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 242-267.
    7. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 25-40.
    8. Rasolofoson, Ranaivo A. & Nielsen, Martin R. & Jones, Julia P.G., 2018. "The potential of the Global Person Generated Index for evaluating the perceived impacts of conservation interventions on subjective well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 107-118.
    9. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    10. Tontini, Gerson, 2016. "Identifying opportunities for improvement in online shopping sites," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 228-238.
    11. Rafia Afroz, 2017. "An Alternative Model for Supporting the Rice Farmers in Adaptation of Climate Change," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 317-330.
    12. Vivian Polar & Jaqueline A. Ashby & Graham Thiele & Hale Tufan, 2021. "When Is Choice Empowering? Examining Gender Differences in Varietal Adoption through Case Studies from Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Gianluca Goffi & Magdalena Cladera & Linda Osti, 2020. "Sun, Sand, and… Sustainability in Developing Countries from a Tourists’ Perspective. The Case of Punta Cana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Ida Rašovská & Marketa Kubickova & Kateřina Ryglová, 2021. "Importance–performance analysis approach to destination management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 777-794, June.
    15. Bentz, Julia & Lopes, Fernando & Calado, Helena & Dearden, Philip, 2016. "Enhancing satisfaction and sustainable management: Whale watching in the Azores," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 465-476.
    16. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2016. "A comparison of service quality attributes for stand-alone and resort-based luxury hotels in Macau: 3-Dimensional importance-performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 139-159.
    17. Lorena Bašan & Jelena Kapeš & Ana Kamenečki, 2021. "Tourist Satisfaction as a Driver of Destination Marketing Improvements: The Case of the Opatija Riviera," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 33(1), pages 93-112.
    18. Boley, B. Bynum & McGehee, Nancy Gard & Tom Hammett, A.L., 2017. "Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 66-77.
    19. Boonlert Jitmaneeroj, 2024. "Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Chyoug-Hwa Chen, 2018. "Sustainable Tourism Planning for Taiwanese in Administrative Effects with Respect to Chinese Arrivals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6856-:d:576786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.