IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6722-d574566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Environmental Issue and Sustainable Consumption of Online Takeout Food—Practice and Enlightenment Based on China’s Meituan

Author

Listed:
  • Meiwen Guo

    (School of Management, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Entrepreneurship Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first author.)

  • Liang Wu

    (School of Management, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Entrepreneurship Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Jianping Peng

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Chun-Hung Chiu

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first author.)

Abstract

In today’s society, consumers’ food needs can be satisfied by catering e-commerce platforms. However, the plastic pollution of tableware and packaging caused by a large number of catering orders every day has always been an unsolved environmental problem. (1) Background: At present, China’s three largest catering platforms, Meituan, Eleme and Baidu, receive 20 million takeout orders daily and consume about 60 million plastic products. Plastic pollution will have a sustained impact on the environment. (2) Methods: In this study, we use literature research and case analysis. We use Meituan’s takeout food as an example. We studied the takeout business growth, status of online takeout in the treatment of plastic packaging, harm to environment, humans and animals, as well as specific solutions. (3) Results: There are four main reasons which contribute to the plastic packaging pollution (i.e., high recycling cost, difficulty to deal with mixed plastic packaging, low effectiveness of collecting plastic packing, and immature technology and treatment to incinerate and landfill catering plastic waste). (4) Conclusion: Our findings suggest that regulators, takeout platforms and consumers, which have corresponding responsibilities in the environmental protection consumption of online food, are supposed to work together to get rid of the online takeout pollution for achieving sustainable consumption. Not only is government legislation needed to improve the waste management system and encourage the exploration of new intelligent waste classification tools, but platforms, businesses and users should enhance the environmental awareness of online takeout packaging pollution as well. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiwen Guo & Liang Wu & Jianping Peng & Chun-Hung Chiu, 2021. "Research on Environmental Issue and Sustainable Consumption of Online Takeout Food—Practice and Enlightenment Based on China’s Meituan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6722-:d:574566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Pollach & Arno Scharl & Albert Weichselbraun, 2009. "Web content mining for comparing corporate and third‐party online reporting: a case study on solid waste management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 137-148, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meiwen Guo & Cheng Ling Tan & Liang Wu & Jianping Peng & Rongwei Ren & Chun-Hung Chiu, 2021. "Determinants of Intention to Purchase Bottled Water Based on Business Online Strategy in China: The Role of Perceived Risk in the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Lun Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Yuzhong Zhou & Liming Wang & Shihan Zhang, 2022. "A Review of Packaging Materials’ Consumption Regulation and Pollution Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le Thuy Duong Ha & Mansi Mansi, 2023. "Accounting for waste: Waste reporting in Australian metals and mining companies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4683-4711, December.
    2. Ralph Adler & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey, 2022. "Accounting for waste management: a study of the reporting practices of the top listed Indian companies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2401-2437, June.
    3. Salla Laasonen & Martin Fougère & Arno Kourula, 2012. "Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO–Business Relations: A Critical Assessment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 521-545, September.
    4. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Ghiron, Nathan Levialdi & Tiburzi, Luigi & Pedersen, Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum, 2021. "How sustainable-orientated service innovation strategies are contributing to the sustainable development goals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Matthias S. Fifka & Maria Drabble, 2012. "Focus and Standardization of Sustainability Reporting – A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Finland," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(7), pages 455-474, November.
    6. Lun Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Yuzhong Zhou & Liming Wang & Shihan Zhang, 2022. "A Review of Packaging Materials’ Consumption Regulation and Pollution Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. J. Emil Morhardt, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(7), pages 436-452, November.
    8. Irene Pollach, 2014. "Corporate Environmental Reporting and News Coverage of Environmental Issues: an Agenda‐Setting Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 349-360, July.
    9. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6722-:d:574566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.