IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6151-d565474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Performance of Resilient Supply Chain Sustainability in Covid-19 by Sourcing Technological Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Yongming Wang

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Umar Iqbal

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Yingmei Gong

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

The present study describes technological integration as source of the sustainable supply chain resilience. The implementation of sustainable supply chain resilience has recently played a vital role, owing to its substantial factors which influence the business continuity. The influence of sustainable supply chain resilience is greatly varying, to embrace companies’ efficiency during a crisis such as COVID-19. In the present study, systematic model-based integration of sustainable supply chain resilience is developed, which can benefit the companies’ profile of work normalcy during the pandemic situation by managing the associated risks. Different variable factors are considered, to assess their impact on the sustainable supply chain. These factors are environmental regulatory system, customer response monitoring system, environmental uncertainty, interoperability and operational integration. Data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed with statistical tools of interpretation. This research is concluded with the assessment that there is a significant correlation between technological integration and the resilient supply chain’s sustainability. The business organizations need to understand the current COVID-19 situation, the supply chain issues, and their impact on the other factors. Business organizations need to implement international quality standards through the use of technology. This study highlights the critical components of technological advancement, which can uplift the existing standards. Overall, the study portrays the recent sustainable supply chain resilience-based orientation to cope with the current pandemic situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongming Wang & Umar Iqbal & Yingmei Gong, 2021. "The Performance of Resilient Supply Chain Sustainability in Covid-19 by Sourcing Technological Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6151-:d:565474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmitry Ivanov, 2018. "Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3507-3523, May.
    2. Alessandro Annarelli & Cinzia Battistella & Fabio Nonino, 2020. "A Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Organizational Resilience on Service Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Trinchera, Laura, 2020. "Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Bottom Line," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, chapter 0, pages 93-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Min, Hokey, 2019. "Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 35-45.
    6. Beltagui, Ahmad & Kunz, Nathan & Gold, Stefan, 2020. "The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable supply chain innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Dmitry Ivanov & Christopher S. Tang & Alexandre Dolgui & Daria Battini & Ajay Das, 2021. "Researchers' perspectives on Industry 4.0: multi-disciplinary analysis and opportunities for operations management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 2055-2078, April.
    9. Laibach, Natalie & Börner, Jan & Bröring, Stefanie, 2019. "Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexander Tsipoulanidis & Jörn Schönberger, 2019. "Supply Chain Risk Management and Resilience," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Global Supply Chain and Operations Management, edition 2, chapter 15, pages 455-479, Springer.
    11. Liu, Chih-Hsing, 2017. "The relationships among intellectual capital, social capital, and performance - The moderating role of business ties and environmental uncertainty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 553-561.
    12. Angappa Gunasekaran & Nachiappan Subramanian & Shams Rahman, 2015. "Supply chain resilience: role of complexities and strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6809-6819, November.
    13. Carlo Rega & Alessandro Bonifazi, 2020. "The Rise of Resilience in Spatial Planning: A Journey through Disciplinary Boundaries and Contested Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Yunhui Zhao & Taiwen Feng & Hongbo Shi, 2018. "External involvement and green product innovation: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1167-1180, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Srivastava, Gautam & Shore, Adam & Ram, Pratibha, 2023. "Examining the role of virtue ethics and big data in enhancing viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    2. Jihane Ktite & Meryem El Alaoui Amine, 2022. "Towards a resilient and sustainable supply chain: bibliometric analysis and systematic review of the literature [Vers une Supply Chain résiliente et durable : analyse bibliométrique et revue systém," Post-Print hal-03914969, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Kumar Pandey & Yash Daultani & Saurabh Pratap, 2024. "Blockchain technology enabled critical success factors for supply chain resilience and sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1533-1554, February.
    2. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Syed Imran Zaman & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Sahar Qabool & Himanshu Gupta, 2023. "How digitalization in banking improve service supply chain resilience of e-commerce sector? a technological adoption model approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 904-930, June.
    5. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    6. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Yi Zheng & Li Liu & Victor Shi & Wenxing Huang & Jianxiu Liao, 2022. "A Resilience Analysis of a Medical Mask Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simulation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Pattanayak, Sirsha & Ramkumar, M. & Goswami, Mohit & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Blockchain technology and supply chain performance: The role of trust and relational capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    9. Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kumar, Ajay & Antony, Jiju, 2023. "Influences of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology on financial resilience of supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Xiaoli Guo & Weili Xia & Taiwen Feng & Jianyu Tan & Fenggang Xian, 2024. "Blockchain technology adoption and sustainable supply chain finance: The perspective of information processing theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3614-3632, July.
    12. Bai, Chunguang & Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Do blockchain capabilities help overcome supply and operational risks: Insights from firm market returns during COVID-19," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Muhammad Umar Farooq & Amjad Hussain & Tariq Masood & Muhammad Salman Habib, 2021. "Supply Chain Operations Management in Pandemics: A State-of-the-Art Review Inspired by COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Sahebi, Iman Ghasemian & Mosayebi, Alireza & Masoomi, Behzad & Marandi, Fatemeh, 2022. "Modeling the enablers for blockchain technology adoption in renewable energy supply chain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Jin Sung Rha, 2020. "Trends of Research on Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Review Using Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Usama Awan & Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Ismail Gölgeci, 2021. "Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1283-1295, February.
    17. Neungho Han & Juneho Um, 2024. "Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Tuhin Sengupta & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy & Roger Moser & Vijay Pereira & Devleena Bhattacharjee, 2022. "Disruptive Technologies for Achieving Supply Chain Resilience in COVID-19 Era: An Implementation Case Study of Satellite Imagery and Blockchain Technologies in Fish Supply Chain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1107-1123, August.
    19. Yigit Kazancoglu & Cisem Lafci & Yalcin Berberoglu & Arvind Upadhyay & Luis Rocha-Lona & Vikas Kumar, 2024. "The effects of globalization on supply chain resilience: outsourcing techniques as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization strategies," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 505-522, June.
    20. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6151-:d:565474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.