IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6078-d564143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability on Northern Sand Prevention Belt of China Based on the Ecological Pressure–Sensibility–Resilience Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiufen Li

    (Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Lining Song

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Qingyuan Forest CERN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Liaoning Key Laboratory for Management of Non-Commercial Forests, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Zunbo Xie

    (Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Tian Gao

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Qingyuan Forest CERN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Liaoning Key Laboratory for Management of Non-Commercial Forests, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Tingting Wang

    (Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Xiao Zheng

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Qingyuan Forest CERN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    Liaoning Key Laboratory for Management of Non-Commercial Forests, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Jiang Liu

    (Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Limin Liu

    (Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of ecological vulnerability is of great significance for ecological protection and restoration in ecologically vulnerable regions. Here, the ecological vulnerability of the northern sand prevention belt (NSPB) of China was assessed using an ecological pressure–sensibility–resilience model from 2000 to 2015. Results showed that the ecological vulnerability index (EVI) displayed low values in the eastern part and high values in the western part of the study region. The EVI ranged from 0.29 to 1.32 in 2000, with the mean value of 0.88, whereas it averaged 0.78 in 2015, ranging from 0.21 to 1.26. Decreasing EVI from 2000 to 2015 indicated that the ecological status has been improved. Moreover, the area proportion of moderately, heavily, and extremely ecological vulnerability levels occupied approximately 87% in both 2000 and 2015, indicating a high ecological vulnerability level. Furthermore, the change in area proportion of different ecological vulnerability levels were associated with the change in the spatial distribution of vegetation coverage, indicating that eco-environmental protection projects were indeed effective. These findings indicated that differential strategies in different restoration zones should be adopted, especially in the western parts of the study region, and eco-environmental protection projects should be reinforced to improve the ecological restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiufen Li & Lining Song & Zunbo Xie & Tian Gao & Tingting Wang & Xiao Zheng & Jiang Liu & Limin Liu, 2021. "Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability on Northern Sand Prevention Belt of China Based on the Ecological Pressure–Sensibility–Resilience Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6078-:d:564143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lei Ye & Lei Wang, 2017. "Locating Sustainability Issues: Identification of Ecological Vulnerability in Mainland China’s Mega-Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Rong Li & Rui Han & Qianru Yu & Shuang Qi & Luo Guo, 2020. "Spatial Heterogeneous of Ecological Vulnerability in Arid and Semi-Arid Area: A Case of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Gabriela B. Christmann & Karsten Balgar & Nicole Mahlkow, 2014. "Local Constructions of Vulnerability and Resilience in the Context of Climate Change. A Comparison of Lübeck and Rostock," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Zafer Defne & Alfredo L Aretxabaleta & Neil K Ganju & Tarandeep S Kalra & Daniel K Jones & Kathryn E L Smith, 2020. "A geospatially resolved wetland vulnerability index: Synthesis of physical drivers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Xiaofeng Wang & Yuehao Li & Bingyang Chu & Shirong Liu & Dan Yang & Junwei Luan, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecosystem Changes: A Case Study of the National Barrier Zone, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhengyuan Zhao & Yunlong Zhang & Siqi Sun & Ting Li & Yihe Lü & Wei Jiang & Xing Wu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variations in Grassland Vulnerability on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on a Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Xiamei Yao & Yuanyuan Chen & Qingyi Zhang & Zhongqiong Mou & Xiaojie Yao & Chun Ou, 2022. "Assessment of the Urban Expansion and Its Impact on the Eco-Environment—A Case Study of Hefei Municipal Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Yunxiao Jiang & Yu Shi & Rong Li & Luo Guo, 2021. "A Long-Term Ecological Vulnerability Analysis of the Tibetan Region of Natural Conditions and Ecological Protection Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Mercy J. Borbor-Cordova & Geremy Ger & Angel A. Valdiviezo-Ajila & Mijail Arias-Hidalgo & David Matamoros & Indira Nolivos & Gonzalo Menoscal-Aldas & Federica Valle & Alessandro Pezzoli & Maria del Pi, 2020. "An Operational Framework for Urban Vulnerability to Floods in the Guayas Estuary Region: The Duran Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Greg Oulahen & Linda Mortsch & Erin O’Connell & Deborah Harford & Alexandra Rutledge, 2019. "Local practitioners’ use of vulnerability and resilience concepts in adaptation to flood hazards," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 41-58, March.
    4. Heidi Toivonen, 2022. "Themes of climate change agency: a qualitative study on how people construct agency in relation to climate change," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Gérard Hutter & Markus Leibenath & Annika Mattissek, 2014. "Governing Through Resilience? Exploring Flood Protection in Dresden, Germany," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Dong Li & Chongyang Huan & Jun Yang & Hanlong Gu, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Distribution Changes, Driving Force Analysis and Simulation Prediction of Ecological Vulnerability in Liaoning Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Yafei Wang & Jinfeng Liao & Yao He & Peipei Chen, 2022. "Evolution and Ecological Implications of Land Development and Conservation Patterns on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Mathias Schaefer & Nguyen Xuan Thinh & Stefan Greiving, 2020. "How Can Climate Resilience Be Measured and Visualized? Assessing a Vague Concept Using GIS-Based Fuzzy Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Dan Wanyama & Erin L. Bunting & Nicholas Weil & David Keellings, 2023. "Delineating and characterizing changes in heat wave events across the United States climate regions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Hao Liu & Haiguang Hao & Lihui Sun & Tingting Zhou, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Agro-Pastoral Region in Western China: A Case Study of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Zhengyuan Zhao & Yunlong Zhang & Siqi Sun & Ting Li & Yihe Lü & Wei Jiang & Xing Wu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variations in Grassland Vulnerability on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on a Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Shibo Wen & Yongzhi Wang & Tianqi Tang & Congcong Su & Bowen Li & Muhammad Atif Bilal & Yibo Meng, 2024. "The Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of the Ecological Barrier Transition Zone in the Western Jilin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2020. "Socio-Environmental Vulnerability Assessment for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-5, September.
    14. Huayan Weng & Yongchao Gao & Xinyi Su & Xiaodong Yang & Fangyan Cheng & Renfeng Ma & Yanju Liu & Wen Zhang & Liwen Zheng, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Force Analysis of Green Space in Coastal Cities of Southeast China over the Past 20 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Vulnerability on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Huayong Zhang & Jiayu Zheng & Hengchao Zou & Zhongyu Wang & Xiande Ji & Shijia Zhang & Zhao Liu, 2024. "Evaluating Spatiotemporal Patterns and Integrated Driving Forces of Habitat Quality in the Northern Sand-Prevention Belt of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6078-:d:564143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.