IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6059-d563815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Implementation of Urban Agendas through Urban Action Structures (UAS): The Case of the Basque Country

Author

Listed:
  • Irati Otamendi-Irizar

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Olatz Grijalba

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Alba Arias

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Claudia Pennese

    (RB3, Integrated Urban Innovation, Avda Tolosa 72, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Rufino Hernández

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

Abstract

Cities are the main contributors to pollution, resource consumption and social inequalities. Therefore, they should play a key role in the path towards a more sustainable scenario in line with SDGs and different Urban Agendas. However, there are still difficulties in their implementation and citizen can play a central role. This paper presents the Urban Action Structures (UAS), understood as entities with a catalytic capacity with respect to innovative urban policies. Methodologically, firstly, a prospective analysis from regional to international level has been developed, making it possible to identify innovative lines of action in the field of sustainable cities. Secondly, the study has focused on identifying and studying UAS that can make it possible to implement the lines of action previously identified. This paper has shown that there are already social structures that can be understood as UAS, since they implement actions aligned with the priorities of the Urban Agenda for the Basque Country and, therefore, of the SDGs. The research concludes that UAS can play a key role in facilitating the implementation of Urban Agendas. Hence, urban policies should favor the generation of UAS, in order to promote long-term urban development and to foster a more sustainable spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Irati Otamendi-Irizar & Olatz Grijalba & Alba Arias & Claudia Pennese & Rufino Hernández, 2021. "Effective Implementation of Urban Agendas through Urban Action Structures (UAS): The Case of the Basque Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6059-:d:563815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. Grijalba & N. Urrutia & A. Eizaguirre-Iribar & O. Irulegi & R. Hernández, 2020. "Impact of the Public Management Model on the Implementation of Urban Regeneration Policies: Evidence of the Case of the Basque Country, Spain," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 302-319, May.
    2. Nicola Moczek & Silke L. Voigt-Heucke & Kim G. Mortega & Claudia Fabó Cartas & Jörn Knobloch, 2021. "A Self-Assessment of European Citizen Science Projects on Their Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Ghazala Mansuri, 2004. "Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 1-39.
    4. James Sprinks & Sasha Marie Woods & Stephen Parkinson & Uta Wehn & Hannah Joyce & Luigi Ceccaroni & Mohammad Gharesifard, 2021. "Coordinator Perceptions When Assessing the Impact of Citizen Science towards Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. David Tremblay & Sabine Gowsy & Olivier Riffon & Jean-François Boucher & Samuel Dubé & Claude Villeneuve, 2021. "A Systemic Approach for Sustainability Implementation Planning at the Local Level by SDG Target Prioritization: The Case of Quebec City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    7. Raquel Ajates & Gerid Hager & Pavlos Georgiadis & Saskia Coulson & Mel Woods & Drew Hemment, 2020. "Local Action with Global Impact: The Case of the GROW Observatory and the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Veronika Zavratnik & Dan Podjed & Jure Trilar & Nina Hlebec & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2020. "Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Pedro-José Martínez-Córdoba & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Bernardino Benito & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2021. "The Commitment of Spanish Local Governments to Sustainable Development Goal 11 from a Multivariate Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Deepa Narayan, 1995. "Designing Community Based Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 11662, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alba Arias & Irati Otamendi-Irizar & Olatz Grijalba & Xabat Oregi & Rufino Javier Hernandez-Minguillon, 2022. "Surveillance and Foresight Process of the Sustainable City Context: Innovation Potential Niches and Trends at the European Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regina Grazuleviciene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Aurimas Rapalavicius, 2021. "Measuring the Outcomes of a Participatory Research Study: Findings from an Environmental Epidemiological Study in Kaunas City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Veronika Zavratnik & Dan Podjed & Jure Trilar & Nina Hlebec & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2020. "Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Sasha Marie Woods & Maria Daskolia & Alexis Joly & Pierre Bonnet & Karen Soacha & Sonia Liñan & Tim Woods & Jaume Piera & Luigi Ceccaroni, 2022. "How Networks of Citizen Observatories Can Increase the Quality and Quantity of Citizen-Science-Generated Data Used to Monitor SDG Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Tomasz Laskowicz, 2021. "The Perception of Polish Business Stakeholders of the Local Economic Impact of Maritime Spatial Planning Promoting the Development of Offshore Wind Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Yasutaka Ozaki & Rajib Shaw, 2022. "Citizens’ Social Participation to Implement Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Stephen Parkinson & Sasha Marie Woods & James Sprinks & Luigi Ceccaroni, 2022. "A Practical Approach to Assessing the Impact of Citizen Science towards the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Maria Panitsa & Nikolia Iliopoulou & Emmanouil Petrakis, 2021. "Citizen Science, Plant Species, and Communities’ Diversity and Conservation on a Mediterranean Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Genevieve Rigler & Zoi Dokou & Fahad Khan Khadim & Berhanu G. Sinshaw & Daniel G. Eshete & Muludel Aseres & Wendale Amera & Wangchi Zhou & Xingyu Wang & Mamaru Moges & Muluken Azage & Baikun Li & Eliz, 2022. "Citizen Science and the Sustainable Development Goals: Building Social and Technical Capacity through Data Collection in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    10. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    12. Becker, Jörg & Distel, Bettina & Grundmann, Matthias & Hupperich, Thomas & Kersting, Norbert & Löschel, Andreas & Parreira do Amaral, Marcelo & Scholta, Hendrik, 2021. "Challenges and potentials of digitalisation for small and mid-sized towns: Proposition of a transdisciplinary research agenda," ERCIS Working Papers 36, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    13. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    14. Araujo, M. Caridad & Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Lanjouw, Peter & Özler, Berk, 2008. "Local inequality and project choice: Theory and evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1022-1046, June.
    15. Grootaert, Christiaan, 1999. "Social capital, houshold welfare, and poverty in Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2148, The World Bank.
    16. He, Lulu, 2019. "Identifying local needs for post-disaster recovery in Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 52-62.
    17. Deininger, Klaus W. & Liu, Yanyan, 2008. "Economic and Social Impacts of Self-Help Groups in India," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6482, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Azam Chaudhry & Kate Vyborny, 2013. "Patronage in Rural Punjab: Evidence from a New Household Survey Dataset," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 18(Special E), pages 183-209, September.
    19. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    20. Zhan, Shaohua, 2015. "From Privatization to Deindustrialization: Implications of Chinese Rural Industry and the Ownership Debate Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 108-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6059-:d:563815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.