IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5363-d552354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manure Flushing vs. Scraping in Dairy Freestall Lanes Reduces Gaseous Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth G. Ross

    (Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-8521, USA)

  • Carlyn B. Peterson

    (Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-8521, USA)

  • Yongjing Zhao

    (Air Quality Research Center, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-8521, USA)

  • Yuee Pan

    (Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-8521, USA)

  • Frank M. Mitloehner

    (Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-8521, USA)

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to mitigate ammonia (NH 3 ), greenhouse gases (GHGs), and other air pollutants from lactating dairy cattle waste using different freestall management techniques. For the present study, cows were housed in an environmental chamber from which waste was removed by either flushing or scraping at two different frequencies. The four treatments used were (1) flushing three times a day (F3), (2) flushing six times a day (F6), (3) scraping three times a day (S3), and (4) scraping six times a day (S6). Flushing freestall lanes to remove manure while cows are out of the barn during milking is an industry standard in California. Gas emissions were measured with a mobile agricultural air quality lab connected to the environmental chamber. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) emissions were decreased ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.05) in the flushing vs. scraping treatments, respectively. Scraping increased NH 3 emissions by 175 and 152% for S3 and S6, respectively vs. F3. Ethanol (EtOH) emissions were increased ( p < 0.001) when the frequency of either scraping or flushing was increased from 3 to 6 times but were similar between scraping and flushing treatments. Methane emissions for the F3 vs. other treatments, were decreased ( p < 0.001). Removal of dairy manure by scraping has the potential to increase gaseous emissions such as NH 3 and GHGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth G. Ross & Carlyn B. Peterson & Yongjing Zhao & Yuee Pan & Frank M. Mitloehner, 2021. "Manure Flushing vs. Scraping in Dairy Freestall Lanes Reduces Gaseous Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5363-:d:552354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenth, Russell V., 2016. "Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajeev Bhat & Jorgelina Di Pasquale & Ferenc Istvan Bánkuti & Tiago Teixeira da Silva Siqueira & Philip Shine & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "Global Dairy Sector: Trends, Prospects, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-7, April.
    2. Suresh Neethirajan, 2023. "Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-37, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jiyuan & Tang, Hailong & Chen, Min, 2019. "Linear substitute model-based uncertainty analysis of complicated non-linear energy system performance (case study of an adaptive cycle engine)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 87-108.
    2. Dario Priolo & Ciro Tolisano & Monica Brienza & Daniele Del Buono, 2024. "Insight into the Biostimulant Effect of an Aqueous Duckweed Extract on Tomato Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Sean Coogan & Zhixian Sui & David Raubenheimer, 2018. "Gluttony and guilt: monthly trends in internet search query data are comparable with national-level energy intake and dieting behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Paul E. Rose & James E. Brereton & Lewis J. Rowden & Ricardo Lemos Figueiredo & Lisa M. Riley, 2019. "What’s new from the zoo? An analysis of ten years of zoo-themed research output," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Stella D. Juventia & Sarah K. Jones & Marie-Angélique Laporte & Roseline Remans & Chiara Villani & Natalia Estrada-Carmona, 2020. "Text Mining National Commitments towards Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    8. Šoltés Erik & Zelinová Silvia & Bilíková Mária, 2019. "General Linear Model: An Effective Tool For Analysis Of Claim Severity In Motor Third Party Liability Insurance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 13-31, December.
    9. Anna Zimmermann & Julian E. Prieto-Vivas & Charlotte Cautereels & Anton Gorkovskiy & Jan Steensels & Yves Peer & Kevin J. Verstrepen, 2023. "A Cas3-base editing tool for targetable in vivo mutagenesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Gizachew Kebede Biratu & Eyasu Elias & Pheneas Ntawuruhunga & Nhamo Nhamo, 2018. "Effect of Chicken Manure Application on Cassava Biomass and Root Yields in Two Agro-Ecologies of Zambia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Muhammad Javed ASIF & Deivaseeno Dorairaj & Ratnam Wickneswari, 2017. "Characterization of natural provenances of Acacia mangium Willd. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. in Malaysia based on phenotypic traits," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 562-576.
    12. Xie, Xiaohong & Osińska, Magdalena & Szczepaniak, Małgorzata, 2023. "Do young generations save for retirement? Ensuring financial security of Gen Z and Gen Y," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 644-668.
    13. Belinda A Wilson & Maldwyn J Evans & William G Batson & Sam C Banks & Iain J Gordon & Donald B Fletcher & Claire Wimpenny & Jenny Newport & Emily Belton & Annette Rypalski & Tim Portas & Adrian D Mann, 2020. "Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Poonam Nasipuri & Jakob Herschend & Asker D Brejnrod & Jonas S Madsen & Roall Espersen & Birte Svensson & Mette Burmølle & Samuel Jacquiod & Søren J Sørensen, 2020. "Community-intrinsic properties enhance keratin degradation from bacterial consortia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Patrizia Piotti & Juliane Kaminski, 2016. "Do Dogs Provide Information Helpfully?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Muhammad Majid & Muqarrab Ali & Khurram Shahzad & Fiaz Ahmad & Rao Muhammad Ikram & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Ibrahim A. Alaraidh & Abdulrahman Al-hashimi & Hayssam M. Ali & Tayebeh Zarei & Rahul Datta & Sha, 2020. "Mitigation of Osmotic Stress in Cotton for the Improvement in Growth and Yield through Inoculation of Rhizobacteria and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Coated Diammonium Phosphate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Takahiro Miura & Naoyuki Okochi & Junya Suzuki & Tohru Ifukube, 2023. "Binaural Listening with Head Rotation Helps Persons with Blindness Perceive Narrow Obstacles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Deschaintres, Elodie & Morency, Catherine & Trépanier, Martin, 2022. "Cross-analysis of the variability of travel behaviors using one-day trip diaries and longitudinal data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 228-246.
    19. Frank Schaarschmidt, 2017. "Multiple treatment comparisons in analysis of covariance with interaction," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 609-628, November.
    20. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5363-:d:552354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.