IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p86-d467265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and Integrity of Forest Sector Statistics—A Major Constraint to Effective Forest Policy in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Anton I. Pyzhev

    (School of Economics, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
    Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia)

  • Roman V. Gordeev

    (School of Economics, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
    Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia)

  • Eugene A. Vaganov

    (School of Ecology and Geography, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
    V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia)

Abstract

Russia owns one-fifth of the world’s forest-covered area but has never been the leader of the global forest sector nor in gross output or relative productivity. The issues of the Russian forest sector have attracted research attention, but for many topics, this is still a green field on the map of sectoral studies. We developed a novel approach to understand the primary causes of the inefficiency of the Russian forest policy through the qualitative assessment of completeness and reliability of forest sector-related data. The main output of this paper is a thorough overview of the available sources of data with an assessment of their quality, completeness and reliability. We show that the Russian official forest sector statistics provide only basic indicators for very short periods with few observations being incomplete and inconsistent. Besides a critical analysis of the official statistics, we also discover some known, but still underemployed, resources of information on the Russian forest sector: textual information of official public bodies and companies, accounting records, remote-sensing data, etc. Finally, we discuss the possible ways to improve the data procurement of the forest sector in Russia to support future decision-making. We are convinced that a prerequisite for the implementation of effective forest policy in Russia is a significant expansion and improvement of the volume and quality of statistics on the dynamics of Russian forests and forest economy. Integration of existing and new data sources is necessary to achieve synergistic effects, both in terms of deepening the understanding of key business processes in the industry and in the sense of solving strategic tasks of its development.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton I. Pyzhev & Roman V. Gordeev & Eugene A. Vaganov, 2020. "Reliability and Integrity of Forest Sector Statistics—A Major Constraint to Effective Forest Policy in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:86-:d:467265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/86/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/86/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torniainen, Tatu Juhani & Saastamoinen, Olli Juhani & Petrov, Anatoly Pavlovich, 2006. "Russian forest policy in the turmoil of the changing balance of power," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 403-416, December.
    2. Rantala, Salla & Swallow, Brent & Paloniemi, Riikka & Raitanen, Elina, 2020. "Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Mats‐Olov Olsson, 2006. "Systemic Interventions to Promote Institutional Change in the Russian Forest Sector," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(2), pages 505-530, March.
    4. A. A. Shirov, 2020. "Statistics for the Benefit of Economics and Society," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 3-6, January.
    5. Vladimir Petrov & Tatiana Katkova & Sari Karvinen, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Forestry Economic Indicators of Russia and Finland," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 22(2), pages 294-319.
    6. Natalia Antonova & Leonid Volkov, 2012. "Prospects of transformation of the complex on use of biological resources of the Pacific Russia," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 168-178.
    7. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Frey, Gregory E. & Cubbage, Frederick W. & Holmes, Thomas P. & Reyes-Retana, Graciela & Davis, Robert R. & Megevand, Carole & Rodríguez-Paredes, Diana & Kraus-Elsin, Yoanna & Hernández-Toro, Berenice , 2019. "Competitiveness, certification, and support of timber harvest by community forest enterprises in Mexico," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Smirnov, Sergey, 2015. "Economic Fluctuations in Russia (from the late 1920s to 2015)," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 130-153.
    10. Ulybina, Olga, 2014. "Russian forests: The path of reform," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 143-150.
    11. V. Bessonov., 2015. "What Will the Modern Russian Statistics Have in Store for History?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    12. V. Zubkov., 2010. "The Role of the State in the Development of Russia’ Forestry Complex," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    13. Koellner, Thomas & Sell, Joachim & Navarro, Guillermo, 2010. "Why and how much are firms willing to invest in ecosystem services from tropical forests? A comparison of international and Costa Rican firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2127-2139, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulia I. Pyzheva & Evgeniya V. Zander & Anton I. Pyzhev, 2021. "Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth on Air Pollutant Emissions: Evidence from Angara–Yenisey Siberia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-10, September.
    2. A. I. Pyzhev, 2022. "The Forest Industry of the Regions of Siberia and the Far East: Prospects for the Development of the Forest-Climate Sector," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 402-408, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Malets, 2017. "Recursivity by Organizational Design: The Case of the Forest Stewardship Council," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 343-352, September.
    2. Sergey V. Smirnov & Nikolay V. Kondrashov & Anna V. Petronevich, 2017. "Dating Cyclical Turning Points for Russia: Formal Methods and Informal Choices," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 13(1), pages 53-73, May.
    3. Henry, Laura A. & Tysiachniouk, Maria, 2018. "The uneven response to global environmental governance: Russia's contentious politics of forest certification," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 97-105.
    4. A. I. Pyzhev, 2022. "The Forest Industry of the Regions of Siberia and the Far East: Prospects for the Development of the Forest-Climate Sector," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 402-408, August.
    5. Richard Yao & David Palmer & Barbara Hock & Duncan Harrison & Tim Payn & Juan Monge, 2019. "Forest Investment Framework as a Support Tool for the Sustainable Management of Planted Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Cubbage, Frederick & Kanieski, Bruno & Rubilar, Rafael & Bussoni, Adriana & Olmos, Virginia Morales & Balmelli, Gustavo & Donagh, Patricio Mac & Lord, Roger & Hernández, Carmelo & Zhang, Pu & Huang, J, 2020. "Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Farley, Joshua & Costanza, Robert, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2060-2068, September.
    8. Kelly J. Wendland & Matthias Baumann & David J. Lewis & Anika Sieber & Volker C. Radeloff, 2015. "Protected Area Effectiveness in European Russia: A Postmatching Panel Data Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(1), pages 149-168.
    9. Schusser, Carsten & Krott, Max & Yufanyi Movuh, Mbolo C. & Logmani, Jacqueline & Devkota, Rosan R. & Maryudi, Ahamad & Salla, Manjola & Bach, Ngo Duy, 2015. "Powerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry — Results of an international study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 92-101.
    10. Ekaterina Zhuravskaya & Sergei Guriev & Andrei Markevich, 2024. "New Russian Economic History," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 47-114, March.
    11. Mislimshoeva, Bunafsha & Herbst, Peter & Koellner, Thomas, 2016. "Current pathways towards good forest governance for ecosystem services in the former Soviet republic Tajikistan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 11-19.
    12. Angelstam, Per & Elbakidze, Marine & Axelsson, Robert & Khoroshev, Alexander & Pedroli, Bas & Tysiachniouk, Maria & Zabubenin, Evgeny, 2019. "Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 96-110.
    13. Aldieri, Luigi & Kotsemir, Maxim & Paolo Vinci, Concetto, 2021. "Environmental innovations and productivity: Empirical evidence from Russian regions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Marlen S. Krause & Nils Droste & Bettina Matzdorf, 2021. "What makes businesses commit to nature conservation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 741-755, February.
    15. Thomas P. Narins, 2015. "Dynamics of the Russia–China Forest Products Trade," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 688-703, December.
    16. Pynnönen, Sari & Haltia, Emmi & Hujala, Teppo, 2021. "Digital forest information platform as service innovation: Finnish Metsaan.fi service use, users and utilisation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Schmitt, Thomas M. & Martín-López, Berta & Kaim, Andrea & Früh-Müller, Andrea & Koellner, Thomas, 2021. "Ecosystem services from (pre-)Alpine grasslands: Matches and mismatches between citizens’ perceived suitability and farmers’ management considerations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Matilainen, Anna-Maija, 2013. "Forest companies, corporate social responsibility, and company stakeholders in the Russian forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 44-49.
    19. Yulia I. Pyzheva & Evgeniya V. Zander & Anton I. Pyzhev, 2021. "Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth on Air Pollutant Emissions: Evidence from Angara–Yenisey Siberia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-10, September.
    20. Popa, Bogdan & Niță, Mihai Daniel & Hălălișan, Aureliu Florin, 2019. "Intentions to engage in forest law enforcement in Romania: An application of the theory of planned behavior," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 33-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:86-:d:467265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.