IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3779-d354670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of the Bucharest University of Economic Studies through Green Facades in an Economically Efficient Manner

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu

    (The Faculty of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, The Department of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 5-7 Mihail Moxa Street, District 1, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Costel Negrei

    (The Faculty of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, The Department of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 5-7 Mihail Moxa Street, District 1, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Dinu

    (The Faculty of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, The Department of Agrifood and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 5-7 Mihail Moxa Street, District 1, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Roxana Chiocaru

    (The Faculty of Biology, The Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independenței Street, 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the current environmental issues, more specifically the amount of greenhouse gases humanity is being confronted with at the moment. The research was carried out on a niche of the topic, namely on the carbon footprint of public buildings. The concept of a sustainable university is new and insufficiently explored, and as part of the environmental metabolism, it influences anthropic sustainability in a directly proportional manner. This indicator’s monitoring systems reveal how vulnerable humanity is in front of the latency of an unprecedented and inevitable environmental catastrophe. The ecological effects may be mitigated by the academic community through green urban design. The ecological performance can be expressed in an economically efficient manner, which can, at the same time, create a precious channel of communication within the entire academic community though volunteering for sustainability. Moreover, this research has identified several solutions for optimizing the carbon footprint, which do not hinder the necessary economic development. Within the current context, when most economic activities are leading to ecological collapse, sustainability should be reprioritized with the help of the academic society, through the examples offered by applied research. The premises of this research were represented by bibliometric analyses and the results obtained have proven its importance, as well as the importance of certain scenarios involving solutions for improving the metabolism of nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu & Costel Negrei & Mihai Dinu & Roxana Chiocaru, 2020. "Reducing the Carbon Footprint of the Bucharest University of Economic Studies through Green Facades in an Economically Efficient Manner," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3779-:d:354670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2015. "A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1425-1436.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillermo Filippone & Rocío Sancho & Sebastián Labella, 2021. "Determining the 2019 Carbon Footprint of a School of Design, Innovation and Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Nicolae Istudor & Emilia Gogu & Irina-Elena Petrescu & Cătălin Gheorghe Zemeleagă, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of the Degree of Food Security Assurance at Global Level," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 87-94, September.
    3. Marius CONSTANTIN & Georgiana STRAT & Madalina Elena DEACONU & Simona Roxana PATARLAGEANU, 2021. "INNOVATIVE AGRI-FOOD VALUE CHAIN MANAGEMENT THROUGH a unique urban ecosystem," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 5-22, September.
    4. Irina-Elena Petrescu & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Georgiana-Raluca Lădaru & Răzvan Aurelian Munteanu & Mihai Istudor & Georgiana Adriana Tărășilă, 2022. "Influence of the Total Consumption of Households on Municipal Waste Quantity in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Maria-Floriana Popescu & Bogdan-Cristian Chiripuci & Andreea Orîndaru & Marius Constantin & Albert Scrieciu, 2020. "Fostering Sustainable Development through Shifting Toward Rural Areas and Digitalization—The Case of Romanian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linyan Chen & Xin Gao & Shitao Gong & Zhou Li, 2020. "Regionalization of Green Building Development in China: A Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Liu, Changyu & Wu, Yangyang & Bian, Ji & Li, Dong & Liu, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Influence of PCM design parameters on thermal and optical performance of multi-layer glazed roof," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 151-161.
    3. Madad, A. & Gharagozlou, A. & Majedi, H. & Monavari, S.M., 2019. "A quantitative representation of the urban green building model, focusing on local climatic factors by utilizing monetary valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 61-72.
    4. Qi-Gan Shao & James J. H. Liou & Sung-Shun Weng & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2018. "Improving the Green Building Evaluation System in China Based on the DANP Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lamnatou, Chr. & Moreno, A. & Chemisana, D. & Reitsma, F. & Clariá, F., 2018. "Ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) material: Critical issues and applications with emphasis on buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2186-2201.
    6. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Wang, Yuanhao, 2017. "Parametric study of passive design strategies for high-rise residential buildings in hot and humid climates: miscellaneous impact factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 442-460.
    7. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Aiman Albatayneh & Adel Juaidi & Ramez Abdallah & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2021. "Influence of the Advancement in the LED Lighting Technologies on the Optimum Windows-to-Wall Ratio of Jordanians Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Sadiq, Rehan, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in energy demand reduction for Canadian residential sector: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2005-2016.
    10. Shilei Lu & Ran Wang & Shaoqun Zheng, 2017. "Passive Optimization Design Based on Particle Swarm Optimization in Rural Buildings of the Hot Summer and Warm Winter Zone of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Zhong Fang & Hongrui Zhang & Jianlin Wang & Junbo Tong & Xiaoxiao Li, 2022. "The Coupling and Coordinated Development of Green Builds and Financial Development in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Fabio Bisegna & Benedetta Mattoni & Paola Gori & Francesco Asdrubali & Claudia Guattari & Luca Evangelisti & Sara Sambuco & Francesco Bianchi, 2016. "Influence of Insulating Materials on Green Building Rating System Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Su, Yuan & Wang, Linwei & Feng, Wei & Zhou, Nan & Wang, Luyuan, 2021. "Analysis of green building performance in cold coastal climates: An in-depth evaluation of green buildings in Dalian, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Nasrollahi, Nazanin & Shokri, Elham, 2016. "Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 861-874.
    15. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Sun, Ke, 2016. "A holistic passive design approach to optimize indoor environmental quality of a typical residential building in Hong Kong," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 267-281.
    16. Víctor Fernando Gómez Comendador & Rosa María Arnaldo Valdés & Bernard Lisker, 2019. "A Holistic Approach to the Environmental Certification of Green Airports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-38, July.
    17. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Sun, Ke, 2017. "Developing a meta-model for sensitivity analyses and prediction of building performance for passively designed high-rise residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 422-439.
    18. Sakiyama, N.R.M. & Carlo, J.C. & Frick, J. & Garrecht, H., 2020. "Perspectives of naturally ventilated buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Alhuwayil, Waleed Khalid & Abdul Mujeebu, Muhammad & Algarny, Ali Mohammed M., 2019. "Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1166-1174.
    20. Ziwen Liu & Qian Wang & Vincent J.L. Gan & Luke Peh, 2020. "Envelope Thermal Performance Analysis Based on Building Information Model (BIM) Cloud Platform—Proposed Green Mark Collaboration Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3779-:d:354670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.