IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i3p586-d313547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Envelope Thermal Performance Analysis Based on Building Information Model (BIM) Cloud Platform—Proposed Green Mark Collaboration Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ziwen Liu

    (Digitalization Department, Built Environment Research and Innovation Institute (BERII), Building and Construction Authority, Zero Energy Building (ZEB), 200 Braddell Road, Singapore 579700, Singapore
    School of Science and Technology, Singapore University of Social Science, 463 Clementi Road, Singapore 599494, Singapore
    BCA Academy, 200 Braddell Road, Singapore 579700, Singapore)

  • Qian Wang

    (Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Vincent J.L. Gan

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Luke Peh

    (School of Science and Technology, Singapore University of Social Science, 463 Clementi Road, Singapore 599494, Singapore)

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) and sustainable buildings are two future cornerstones of the Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. In Singapore’s context, the Green Mark (GM) scoring system is prevalently used to assess the sustainability index of green buildings. BIM provides the semantic and geometry information of buildings, which is proliferated as the technological and process backbone for the green building assessment. This research, through vast literature reviews, identified that the current procedure of achieving a Green Mark score is tedious and cumbersome, which hampers productivity, especially in the calculation of building envelope thermal performance. Furthermore, the project stakeholders work in silos, in a non-collaborative, manual and 2D-based environment for generating relevant documentation to achieve the requisite green mark score. To this end, a cloud-based BIM platform was developed, with the aim of encouraging project stakeholders to collaboratively generate the project’s green mark score digitally in accordance with the regulatory requirements. Through this research, the authors have validated the Envelope Thermal Transfer Value (ETTV) calculation, which is one of the prerequisite criteria to achieve a Green Mark score, through a case study using the developed cloud-based BIM platform. The results indicated that using the proposed platform enhances the productivity and accuracy as far as ETTV calculation is concerned. This study provides a basis for future research in implementing the proposed platform for other criteria under the Green Mark Scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziwen Liu & Qian Wang & Vincent J.L. Gan & Luke Peh, 2020. "Envelope Thermal Performance Analysis Based on Building Information Model (BIM) Cloud Platform—Proposed Green Mark Collaboration Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:586-:d:313547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/3/586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/3/586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2015. "A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1425-1436.
    2. Viorel Badescu & Richard B. Cathcart, 2006. "Environmental thermodynamic limitations on global human population," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1/2), pages 129-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhixing Li & Mimi Tian & Xiaoqing Zhu & Shujing Xie & Xin He, 2022. "A Review of Integrated Design Process for Building Climate Responsiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Jorge de Brito & M. Glória Gomes, 2020. "Special Issue “Building Thermal Envelope”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-5, February.
    3. Sanjin Gumbarević & Ivana Burcar Dunović & Bojan Milovanović & Mergim Gaši, 2020. "Method for Building Information Modeling Supported Project Control of Nearly Zero-Energy Building Delivery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Natalia Shushunova & Elena Korol & Elisaveta Luzay & Diana Shafieva & Piero Bevilacqua, 2022. "Ensuring the Safety of Buildings by Reducing the Noise Impact through the Use of Green Wall Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linyan Chen & Xin Gao & Shitao Gong & Zhou Li, 2020. "Regionalization of Green Building Development in China: A Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Liu, Changyu & Wu, Yangyang & Bian, Ji & Li, Dong & Liu, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Influence of PCM design parameters on thermal and optical performance of multi-layer glazed roof," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 151-161.
    3. Madad, A. & Gharagozlou, A. & Majedi, H. & Monavari, S.M., 2019. "A quantitative representation of the urban green building model, focusing on local climatic factors by utilizing monetary valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 61-72.
    4. Qi-Gan Shao & James J. H. Liou & Sung-Shun Weng & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2018. "Improving the Green Building Evaluation System in China Based on the DANP Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lamnatou, Chr. & Moreno, A. & Chemisana, D. & Reitsma, F. & Clariá, F., 2018. "Ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) material: Critical issues and applications with emphasis on buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2186-2201.
    6. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Wang, Yuanhao, 2017. "Parametric study of passive design strategies for high-rise residential buildings in hot and humid climates: miscellaneous impact factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 442-460.
    7. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Aiman Albatayneh & Adel Juaidi & Ramez Abdallah & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2021. "Influence of the Advancement in the LED Lighting Technologies on the Optimum Windows-to-Wall Ratio of Jordanians Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Sadiq, Rehan, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in energy demand reduction for Canadian residential sector: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2005-2016.
    10. Shilei Lu & Ran Wang & Shaoqun Zheng, 2017. "Passive Optimization Design Based on Particle Swarm Optimization in Rural Buildings of the Hot Summer and Warm Winter Zone of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Zhong Fang & Hongrui Zhang & Jianlin Wang & Junbo Tong & Xiaoxiao Li, 2022. "The Coupling and Coordinated Development of Green Builds and Financial Development in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Fabio Bisegna & Benedetta Mattoni & Paola Gori & Francesco Asdrubali & Claudia Guattari & Luca Evangelisti & Sara Sambuco & Francesco Bianchi, 2016. "Influence of Insulating Materials on Green Building Rating System Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Su, Yuan & Wang, Linwei & Feng, Wei & Zhou, Nan & Wang, Luyuan, 2021. "Analysis of green building performance in cold coastal climates: An in-depth evaluation of green buildings in Dalian, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Nasrollahi, Nazanin & Shokri, Elham, 2016. "Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 861-874.
    15. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Sun, Ke, 2016. "A holistic passive design approach to optimize indoor environmental quality of a typical residential building in Hong Kong," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 267-281.
    16. Víctor Fernando Gómez Comendador & Rosa María Arnaldo Valdés & Bernard Lisker, 2019. "A Holistic Approach to the Environmental Certification of Green Airports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-38, July.
    17. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Sun, Ke, 2017. "Developing a meta-model for sensitivity analyses and prediction of building performance for passively designed high-rise residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 422-439.
    18. Sakiyama, N.R.M. & Carlo, J.C. & Frick, J. & Garrecht, H., 2020. "Perspectives of naturally ventilated buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Alhuwayil, Waleed Khalid & Abdul Mujeebu, Muhammad & Algarny, Ali Mohammed M., 2019. "Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1166-1174.
    20. Ana Paola Vargas & Leon Hamui, 2021. "Thermal Energy Performance Simulation of a Residential Building Retrofitted with Passive Design Strategies: A Case Study in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:586-:d:313547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.