IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3594-d351747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Classification and Environmental Treatment Protocols of Solid Waste Sources—A Case Study of Shengzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yufan Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yong Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Kaiyong Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The focus of waste management is to control pollution produced directly from the sources, rather than removing it from soil, water and other such polluted bodies. This study defined solid waste source (SWS) as a space where solid waste is directly produced and proposed a method for measuring the solid waste generated by SWSs. Then, taking Shengzhou, China, as an example, empirical research was conducted on the spatial classification and treatment protocol of SWSs. The results show that (1) A hierarchical spatial system of SWSs can be constructed, which consists of 3 classes, 3 subclasses and 14 types. (2) The main forms of solid waste in Shengzhou are domestic waste, industrial solid waste and agricultural solid waste. According to the total amount of solid waste produced, all SWSs can be divided into five levels: maximum, large, medium, low and none produced. (3) In view of the main SWSs with a large amount of solid waste produced, three methods—combining energy-saving, emission reduction and resource utilization; multiple steps of classification, transportation, storage and treatment; and the use of piggeries with waste-absorbing land—are proposed to realize the control of solid waste pollution at-source.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufan Chen & Yong Xu & Kaiyong Wang, 2020. "Spatial Classification and Environmental Treatment Protocols of Solid Waste Sources—A Case Study of Shengzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3594-:d:351747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paleologos, Evan K. & Caratelli, Paolo & Amrousi, Mohamed El, 2016. "Waste-to-energy: An opportunity for a new industrial typology in Abu Dhabi," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1260-1266.
    2. repec:pes:ieroec:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:417-431 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun, 2017. "The diversity of socioeconomic development of rural areas in Poland in The Western Borderland and the problem of post-state farm localities," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 8(3), pages 417-432, September.
    4. Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun, 2017. "The Diversity Of Socioeconomic Development Of Rural AreasIn The Western Borderland And The Problem Of Post-State Farm Localities," Working Papers 10/2017, Institute of Economic Research, revised May 2017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yufan & Xu, Yong & Wang, Fuyuan & Shi, Fanji, 2022. "Mapping the emission of air pollution sources based on land-use classification: A case study of Shengzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun & Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Agricultural and Tourist Functions in Rural Areas and the Level of Local Development: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 985-995.
    2. Ewa Rollnik-Sadowska & Marta Jarocka & Edyta Dabrowska, 2020. "Diversity of Regional Labour Markets in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 33-51.
    3. Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Wawrzyniak & Maciej Oesterreich, 2021. "The Impact of Transformational Changes on the Socio-Economic Conditions of the Rural Population. An Example of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Samuele Lo Piano & Andrea Saltelli, 2020. "Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 775-802, June.
    5. Karol Król, 2020. "The Scarecrow as Part of Polish Rural Cultural Landscapes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Vitaliy Kovshov & Eugene Stovba & Milyausha Lukyanova & Zariya Zalilova & Guzalia Sitdikova, 2024. "Foresight and forecasting of socio-economic development of rural territories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28219-28237, November.
    7. Dastjerdi, B. & Strezov, V. & Kumar, R. & Behnia, M., 2019. "An evaluation of the potential of waste to energy technologies for residual solid waste in New South Wales, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3594-:d:351747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.