IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1922-d327913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research and Application of Biochar in Soil CO 2 Emission, Fertility, and Microorganisms: A Sustainable Solution to Solve China’s Agricultural Straw Burning Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Huanhuan Wang

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Tianbao Ren

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Technology Engineering Laboratory, Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Huijuan Yang

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Yuqing Feng

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Huilin Feng

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Guoshun Liu

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Technology Engineering Laboratory, Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Quanyu Yin

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Biochar Technology Engineering Laboratory, Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Hongzhi Shi

    (School of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore a new way to address the burning of agricultural waste in China while achieving the sustainable use of it. Three agricultural wastes (Wheat straw, peanut shell, and rice husk) were slowly pyrolyzed into biochar, which was subsequently added to the soil to reduce CO 2 emissions from the soil, and to improve soil fertility as well as microbial community structure. The biochar and raw materials were added to the soil and cultured under controlled conditions, and then the CO 2 emissions produced from the mixing. At the same time, this study used pot experiments to determine the effects of biochar on tobacco soil physical and chemical properties and, therefore, the microbial communities of the soil. This study suggests that (1) biochar can effectively reduce soil CO 2 emission rate. Compared with the control, peanut shell biochar could reduce the total CO 2 emissions of soil by 33.41%, and the total CO 2 emissions of wheat straw biochar treatment was 90.25% lower than that of wheat straw treatment. (2) The soil’s physical and chemical properties were improved. The soil bulk density of wheat straw biochar treatment kept 34.57% lower than that of the control as well as 21.15% lower than that of wheat straw treatment. The soil’s organic carbon of peanut shell biochar treatment was 87.62% more than that of peanut shell treatment. (3) Biochar changed soil microbial community structure. (4) Biochar is suitable for tobacco growth. Peanut husk biochar significantly increased the total biomass of tobacco, and wheat straw biochar significantly increased tobacco root vigor. This study concluded that processing Chinese agricultural waste into biochar and adding it to the soil instead of burning it directly would be an effective means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to improve soil, and to promote crop growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanhuan Wang & Tianbao Ren & Huijuan Yang & Yuqing Feng & Huilin Feng & Guoshun Liu & Quanyu Yin & Hongzhi Shi, 2020. "Research and Application of Biochar in Soil CO 2 Emission, Fertility, and Microorganisms: A Sustainable Solution to Solve China’s Agricultural Straw Burning Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1922-:d:327913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gadalla, M. & Olujić, Ž. & Jobson, M. & Smith, R., 2006. "Estimation and reduction of CO2 emissions from crude oil distillation units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2398-2408.
    2. Zhang, Ming & Liu, Xiao & Wang, Wenwen & Zhou, Min, 2013. "Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 159-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nokuthula Khanyile & Ndumiso Dlamini & Absalom Masenya & Nothando Clementine Madlala & Sabelo Shezi, 2024. "Preparation of Biofertilizers from Banana Peels: Their Impact on Soil and Crop Enhancement," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Ping Yu & Qiansheng Li & Lan Huang & Kuan Qin & Genhua Niu & Mengmeng Gu, 2020. "The Effects of Mixed Hardwood Biochar, Mycorrhizae, and Fertigation on Container Tomato and Pepper Plant Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaivo-oja, J. & Luukkanen, J. & Panula-Ontto, J. & Vehmas, J. & Chen, Y. & Mikkonen, S. & Auffermann, B., 2014. "Are structural change and modernisation leading to convergence in the CO2 economy? Decomposition analysis of China, EU and USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 115-125.
    2. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s mining industry: Evidence and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-87.
    3. Xuankai Deng & Yanhua Yu & Yanfang Liu, 2015. "Effect of Construction Land Expansion on Energy-Related Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis of China and Its Provinces from 2001 to 2011," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Wang, Xiaolei & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "How to reduce CO2 emissions in China׳s iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1496-1505.
    5. Wang, Zhiping & Feng, Chao & Chen, Jinyu & Huang, Jianbai, 2017. "The driving forces of material use in China: An index decomposition analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 336-348.
    6. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Hou, Yu-Lin & Hung, Chen-I., 2012. "A study of influence of acoustic excitation on carbon dioxide capture by a droplet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 311-321.
    7. Yuan Liu & Qinliang Tan & Jian Han & Mingxin Guo, 2021. "Energy-Water-Carbon Nexus Optimization for the Path of Achieving Carbon Emission Peak in China Considering Multiple Uncertainties: A Case Study in Inner Mongolia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Shao, Shuai & Huang, Tao & Yang, Lili, 2014. "Using latent variable approach to estimate China׳s economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954–2010," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 235-248.
    9. Yan, Qingyou & Zhang, Qian & Zou, Xin, 2016. "Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China's regional thermal electricity generation, 2000–2020," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 788-794.
    10. Azam, Muhammad & Younes, Ben Zaied & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Hussain, Nazim, 2022. "Integrated Spatial-Temporal decomposition analysis for life cycle assessment of carbon emission intensity change in various regions of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina, 2021. "Unhiding the role of CHP in power & heat sector decomposition analyses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Wei Sun & Ming Meng & Yujun He & Hong Chang, 2016. "CO 2 Emissions from China’s Power Industry: Scenarios and Policies for 13th Five-Year Plan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Qingyou Yan & Yaxian Wang & Tomas Baležentis & Yikai Sun & Dalia Streimikiene, 2018. "Energy-Related CO 2 Emission in China’s Provincial Thermal Electricity Generation: Driving Factors and Possibilities for Abatement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Qadeer, Kinza & Minh, Le Quang & Haider, Junaid & Lee, Moonyong, 2019. "Nitrogen self-recuperation expansion-based process for offshore coproduction of liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and pentane plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 247-257.
    16. Hannah Förster & Katja Schumacher & Enrica De Cian & Michael Hübler & Ilkka Keppo & Silvana Mima & Ronald D. Sands, 2013. "European Energy Efficiency And Decarbonization Strategies Beyond 2030 — A Sectoral Multi-Model Decomposition," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(supp0), pages 1-29.
    17. Qipeng Sun & Yafang Geng & Fei Ma & Chao Wang & Bo Wang & Xiu Wang & Wenlin Wang, 2018. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Factor Decomposition for Ecological Pressure of Carbon Footprint in the One Belt and One Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Wang, H. & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2017. "Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 585-599.
    19. Xue-Ting Jiang & Min Su & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Decomposition Analysis in Electricity Sector Output from Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Ji, Ling & Liang, Sai & Qu, Shen & Zhang, Yanxia & Xu, Ming & Jia, Xiaoping & Jia, Yingtao & Niu, Dongxiao & Yuan, Jiahai & Hou, Yong & Wang, Haikun & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Hu, Xiaojun, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emission factors of purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 751-758.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1922-:d:327913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.