IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1630-d323532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco

Author

Listed:
  • Peihao Song

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton 49931, MI, USA)

  • Gunwoo Kim

    (Graduate School of Urban Studies, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Audrey Mayer

    (College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton 49931, MI, USA)

  • Ruizhen He

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Guohang Tian

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

Urban green spaces play a crucial role in maintaining urban ecosystem sustainability by providing numerous ecosystem services. How to quantify and evaluate the ecological benefits and services of urban green spaces remains a hot topic currently, while the evaluation is barely applied or implemented in urban design and planning. In this study, super-high-resolution aerial images were used to acquire the spatial distribution of urban green spaces; a modified pre-stratified random sampling method was applied to obtain the vegetation information of the four types of urban green spaces in Luohe, a common plain city in China; and i-Tree Eco model was further used to assess the vegetation structure and various ecosystem services including air quality improvement, rainfall interception, carbon storage, and sequestration provided by four types of urban green spaces. The modeling results reveal that there were about 1,006,251 trees in this area. In 2013, all the trees in these green spaces could store about 54,329 t of carbon, sequester about 4973 t of gross carbon, remove 92 t of air pollutants, and avoid 122,637 m 3 of runoff. The study illustrates an innovative method to reveal different types of urban green spaces with distinct ecosystem service productivity capacity to better understand their various roles in regulating the urban environment. The results could be used to assist urban planners and policymakers to optimize urban green space structure and composition to maximize ecosystem services provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1630-:d:323532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christie Klimas & Allison Williams & Megan Hoff & Beth Lawrence & Jennifer Thompson & James Montgomery, 2016. "Valuing Ecosystem Services and Disservices across Heterogeneous Green Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Zhijie Wu & Yixin Zhang, 2018. "Spatial Variation of Urban Thermal Environment and Its Relation to Green Space Patterns: Implication to Sustainable Landscape Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Janis Arnold & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2018. "A Differentiated Spatial Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services Based on Land Use Data in Halle, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-29, August.
    5. McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg & Hamstead, Zoé A., 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social–ecological approach in urban vacant land," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 11-26.
    6. Holt, Alison R. & Mears, Meghann & Maltby, Lorraine & Warren, Philip, 2015. "Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 33-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Jiang & Bojie Fu & Yihe Lü, 2020. "Assessing Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Conversion on Changes in Ecosystem Services Value on the Loess Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Teodoro Semeraro & Aurelia Scarano & Riccardo Buccolieri & Angelo Santino & Eeva Aarrevaara, 2021. "Planning of Urban Green Spaces: An Ecological Perspective on Human Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Richa Sharma & Lolita Pradhan & Maya Kumari & Prodyut Bhattacharya & Varun Narayan Mishra & Deepak Kumar, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Urban Carbon Storage and Its Dynamics Using InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Liu, Yang & Kwan, Mei-Po & Wong, Man Sing & Yu, Changda, 2023. "Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    6. Min Liu & Xiaoma Li & Ding Song & Hui Zhai, 2021. "Evaluation and Monitoring of Urban Public Greenspace Planning Using Landscape Metrics in Kunming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Guangxi Shen & Zipeng Song & Jiacong Xu & Lishuang Zou & Lijin Huang & Yingnan Li, 2023. "Are Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees at Parcel Level Worthy of Attention? A Case Study of a Campus in Zhenjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Evidence Chinedu Enoguanbhor, 2022. "Geospatial Assessments of Urban Green Space Protection in Abuja City, Nigeria," Eximia Journal, Plus Communication Consulting SRL, vol. 5(1), pages 177-194, July.
    9. Moreno, Roberto & Nery, André & Zamora, Ricardo & Lora, Ángel & Galán, Carmen, 2024. "Contribution of urban trees to carbon sequestration and reduction of air pollutants in Lima, Peru," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Jaime Aguilar Rojas & Amalesh Dhar & M. Anne Naeth, 2021. "Urban Naturalization for Green Spaces Using Soil Tillage, Herbicide Application, Compost Amendment and Native Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Penglong Wang & Yanyan Ma & Xueyan Zhao & Bao Wang & Jianghao Wang & Feng Gao, 2020. "Regional Differences and Influential Factors of Open Public Space in Chinese Cities Based on Big Earth Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Yugang Chen & Changkun Xie & Ruiyuan Jiang & Shengquan Che, 2021. "Optimization of Ecosystem Services of Shanghai Urban–Suburban Street Trees Based on Low-Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Ryohei Ogawa & Ye Zhang & Vouchlay Theng & Zhongyu Guo & Manna Wang & Chihiro Yoshimura, 2023. "Capacity Assessment of Urban Green Space for Mitigating Combined Sewer Overflows in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Liyixuan Fan & Jingmao Wang & Du Han & Jie Gao & Yingyu Yao, 2022. "Research on Promoting Carbon Sequestration of Urban Green Space Distribution Characteristics and Planting Design Models in Xi’an," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Qingyu Sui & Hongzuo Jia & Meiyue Zhao & Yan Zhou & Lei Fan, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecosystem Services of Urban Street Trees: A Case Study of Shengjing Historical and Cultural Block in Shenyang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Wojciech Durlak & Margot Dudkiewicz & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "A Combined Methods of Senile Trees Inventory in Sustainable Urban Greenery Management on the Example of the City of Sandomierz (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-29, October.
    17. Suchocka, Marzena & Heciak, Jakub & Błaszczyk, Magdalena & Adamczyk, Joanna & Gaworski, Marek & Gawłowska, Agnieszka & Mojski, Jacek & Kalaji, Hazem M. & Kais, Karolina & Kosno-Jończy, Joanna & Heciak, 2023. "Comparison of Ecosystem Services and Replacement Value calculations performed for urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Jaime Aguilar Rojas & Amalesh Dhar & M. Anne Naeth, 2022. "Urban Green Spaces Restoration Using Native Forbs, Site Preparation and Soil Amendments—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Valck, Jeremy & Beames, Alistair & Liekens, Inge & Bettens, Maarten & Seuntjens, Piet & Broekx, Steven, 2019. "Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 139-149.
    2. Dongwoo Lee & Kyushik Oh & Jungeun Suh, 2022. "Diagnosis and Prioritization of Vulnerable Areas of Urban Ecosystem Regulation Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Karsten Grunewald & Olaf Bastian ., 2017. "Special Issue: “Maintaining Ecosystem Services to Support Urban Needs”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    4. Thompson, Kate & Sherren, Kate & Duinker, Peter N., 2019. "The use of ecosystem services concepts in Canadian municipal plans," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Cortinovis, Chiara & Geneletti, Davide, 2019. "A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    8. Yangang Xing & Phil Jones & Iain Donnison, 2017. "Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Neier, Thomas, 2023. "The green divide: A spatial analysis of segregation-based environmental inequality in Vienna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Paletto, Alessandro & Pastorella, Fabio & Granvik, Madeleine & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2018. "Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 411-424.
    11. Amit Kumar & Vivek Agarwal & Lalit Pal & Surendra Kumar Chandniha & Vishal Mishra, 2021. "Effect of Land Surface Temperature on Urban Heat Island in Varanasi City, India," J, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, August.
    12. Thomas Panagopoulos & Stilianos Tampakis & Paraskevi Karanikola & Aikaterini Karipidou-Kanari & Apostolos Kantartzis, 2018. "The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian and Cycling Streets on Residents’ Well-being in Kalamaria, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Sun, Ranhao & Chen, Liding, 2017. "Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: Mitigation and diversification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 38-46.
    14. Karen T. Lourdes & Chris N. Gibbins & Perrine Hamel & Ruzana Sanusi & Badrul Azhar & Alex M. Lechner, 2021. "A Review of Urban Ecosystem Services Research in Southeast Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Maria Susana Orta Ortiz & Davide Geneletti, 2018. "Assessing Mismatches in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services to Support Spatial Planning: A Case Study on Recreation and Food Supply in Havana, Cuba," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Byungsun Yang & Dongkun Lee, 2021. "Urban Green Space Arrangement for an Optimal Landscape Planning Strategy for Runoff Reduction," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Melissa R. McHale & Steward T.A. Pickett & Olga Barbosa & David N. Bunn & Mary L. Cadenasso & Daniel L. Childers & Meredith Gartin & George R. Hess & David M. Iwaniec & Timon McPhearson & M. Nils Pete, 2015. "The New Global Urban Realm: Complex, Connected, Diffuse, and Diverse Social-Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Kuo-Wei Hsu & Jen-Chih Chao, 2021. "Study on the Value Model of Urban Green Infrastructure Development—A Case Study of the Central District of Taichung City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Greg D. Simpson & Jackie Parker, 2018. "Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, November.
    20. Wojciech Durlak & Margot Dudkiewicz & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "A Combined Methods of Senile Trees Inventory in Sustainable Urban Greenery Management on the Example of the City of Sandomierz (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1630-:d:323532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.