IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i1p880-d1024203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees at Parcel Level Worthy of Attention? A Case Study of a Campus in Zhenjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangxi Shen

    (Department of Environmental Design, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Zipeng Song

    (Department of Environmental Design, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Republic of Korea)

  • Jiacong Xu

    (Department of Environmental Design, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Lishuang Zou

    (School of Art and Design, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116034, China)

  • Lijin Huang

    (Department of Environmental Design, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Yingnan Li

    (Department of Environmental Design, School of Arts, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Department of Environmental Planning Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Street trees in urban areas have positive impacts on the environment, such as climate regulation, air purification, and runoff mitigation. However, the ecosystem services (ES) provided by street trees at the parcel level remain a notable gap in the existing literature. This study quantified the ES benefits provided by street trees at Jiangsu University in Zhenjiang, China, which could represent the parcel level. A widely applied model, i-Tree Eco, was used to evaluate the ES, including carbon storage, carbon sequestration, pollutant removal, rainwater runoff reduction, and their economic value. We also analyzed how these are affected by the structure of tree species. The results revealed that the 10 most abundant species accounted for 84.3% of the total number of trees, with an unstable structure of species composition. A reasonable age proportion was important since a lower proportion of young trees may make future benefit outputs unstable. The annual economic value provided by ES was USD 205,253.20, with an average of USD 79.90 per tree. Platanus orientalis had the highest single plant benefit, indicating that the management pattern of street trees could be adapted in different environments to maximize benefits. Thus, street trees at the parcel level should receive more attention with strategic planning and management in order to maximize the ES and their economic value.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangxi Shen & Zipeng Song & Jiacong Xu & Lishuang Zou & Lijin Huang & Yingnan Li, 2023. "Are Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees at Parcel Level Worthy of Attention? A Case Study of a Campus in Zhenjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:880-:d:1024203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiyuan Xiang & Meifang Zhao & U. S. Ogbodo, 2020. "Accumulation of Urban Insect Pests in China: 50 Years’ Observations on Camphor Tree ( Cinnamomum camphora )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Arerut Yarnvudhi & Nisa Leksungnoen & Pantana Tor-Ngern & Aerwadee Premashthira & Sathid Thinkampheang & Sutheera Hermhuk, 2021. "Evaluation of Regulating and Provisioning Services Provided by a Park Designed to Be Resilient to Climate Change in Bangkok, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Forest Isbell & Vincent Calcagno & Andy Hector & John Connolly & W. Stanley Harpole & Peter B. Reich & Michael Scherer-Lorenzen & Bernhard Schmid & David Tilman & Jasper van Ruijven & Alexandra Weigel, 2011. "High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7363), pages 199-202, September.
    4. Fischer, L.K. & Honold, J. & Botzat, A. & Brinkmeyer, D. & Cvejić, R. & Delshammar, T. & Elands, B. & Haase, D. & Kabisch, N. & Karle, S.J. & Lafortezza, R. & Nastran, M. & Nielsen, A.B. & van der Jag, 2018. "Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 455-467.
    5. Heber Dunning, Kelly, 2015. "Ecosystem services and community based coral reef management institutions in post blast-fishing Indonesia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 319-332.
    6. Shaikh M. S. U. Eskander & Sam Fankhauser, 2020. "Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(8), pages 750-756, August.
    7. Xueyan Wang & Jing Yao & Shuai Yu & Chunping Miao & Wei Chen & Xingyuan He, 2018. "Street Trees in a Chinese Forest City: Structure, Benefits and Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mónica Andrade & Cláudia Fernandes & António Coutinho & Albano Figueiredo, 2023. "Urban Green Infrastructure: Does Species’ Origin Impair Ecosystem Services Provision?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lea Berrang‐Ford & Friederike Döbbe & Ruth Garside & Neal Haddaway & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Vivian Welch & Howard White, 2020. "Editorial: Evidence synthesis for accelerated learning on climate solutions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    2. Eskander, Shaikh M.S.U. & Steele, Paul, 2023. "Private disaster expenditures by rural Bangladeshi households: evidence from survey data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118337, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Admiraal, Jeroen F. & Wossink, Ada & de Groot, Wouter T. & de Snoo, Geert R., 2013. "More than total economic value: How to combine economic valuation of biodiversity with ecological resilience," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 115-122.
    4. Lei Wang & Xiaobo Huang & Jianrong Su, 2022. "Tree Species Diversity and Stand Attributes Differently Influence the Ecosystem Functions of Pinus yunnanensis Secondary Forests under the Climate Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Munawar, Muhammad Assad & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Hassan, Muhammad & Liaquat, Rabia & Dawood, Usama Fida, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Finger, Robert & Buchmann, Nina, 2015. "An ecological economic assessment of risk-reducing effects of species diversity in managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-97.
    7. Shuo Wei & Su-Ting Cheng, 2022. "Estimating Pruning-Caused Loss on Ecosystem Services of Air Pollution Removal and Runoff Avoidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-Related and Socio-Demographic Variations in Urban Green Space Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Shaikh Eskander & Sam Fankhauser & Joana Setzer, 2021. "Global Lessons from Climate Change Legislation and Litigation," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 44-82.
    10. Qingyu Sui & Hongzuo Jia & Meiyue Zhao & Yan Zhou & Lei Fan, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecosystem Services of Urban Street Trees: A Case Study of Shengjing Historical and Cultural Block in Shenyang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Eve Burrows & Margaret O’Mahony & Dermot Geraghty, 2018. "How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Jones, Laurence & Milne, Alice & Hall, Jane & Mills, Gina & Provins, Allan & Christie, Michael, 2018. "Valuing Improvements in Biodiversity Due to Controls on Atmospheric Nitrogen Pollution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 358-366.
    13. Ulukan, Defne & Grillot, Myriam & Benoit, Marc & Bernes, Gun & Dumont, Bertrand & Magne, Marie-Angélina & Monteiro, Leonardo & Parsons, David & Veysset, Patrick & Ryschawy, Julie & Steinmetz, Lucille , 2022. "Positive deviant strategies implemented by organic multi-species livestock farms in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Liu, Ying & Feng, Chao, 2023. "Promoting renewable energy through national energy legislation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Peng Zhan & Guang Hu & Ruilian Han & Yu Kang, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Visitation and Revisitation of Urban Parks: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Guangzhou Wang & Haley M. Burrill & Laura Y. Podzikowski & Maarten B. Eppinga & Fusuo Zhang & Junling Zhang & Peggy A. Schultz & James D. Bever, 2023. "Dilution of specialist pathogens drives productivity benefits from diversity in plant mixtures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-related and socio-demographic variations in urban green space preferences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/326192, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Maund, Phoebe R. & Irvine, Katherine N. & Dallimer, Martin & Fish, Robert & Austen, Gail E. & Davies, Zoe G., 2020. "Do ecosystem service frameworks represent people’s values?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Francesco Lami & Francesco Boscutti & Elisabetta Peccol & Lucia Piani & Matteo De Luca & Pietro Zandigiacomo & Maurizia Sigura, 2024. "Biodiversity-Centric Habitat Networks for Green Infrastructure Planning: A Case Study in Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Coline C. F. Boonman & Josep M. Serra-Diaz & Selwyn Hoeks & Wen-Yong Guo & Brian J. Enquist & Brian Maitner & Yadvinder Malhi & Cory Merow & Robert Buitenwerf & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2024. "More than 17,000 tree species are at risk from rapid global change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:880-:d:1024203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.