IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1451-d321125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood Risk Assessment Based on Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Method in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Area, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangpeng Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yong Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Ziying Hu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yanli Lyu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Guoming Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jifu Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yun Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yu Gu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xichen Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Hao Zheng

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Qingyan Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Zongze Tong

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Chang Hong

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Lianyou Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most devastating natural events and leads to enormous and recurring loss of life, properties, and resources around the globe. With climate change and accelerating urbanization, flood disasters in China have increasingly affected the sustainable development of metropolitan areas. Risk assessment is an essential step in flood management and disaster mitigation, which provide a quantitative measure of flood risk. However, the difficulty of flood risk zoning is dealing with the uncertainty of the evaluation process and the complicated non-linear relationship between indicators and risk levels. To address this issue, a fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) method based on combined weight (CW) was utilized in this paper to generate flood risk maps at a grid-scale (1 × 1 km). For the case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area (BTH) in China, fourteen indicators were selected to construct the flood risk assessment model based on the FSE approach integrated with ArcGIS. The research demonstrates that moderate, high, and very high risk zones are distributed in the southeast fluvial plain of the BTH area, accounting for 31.36% of the total land area. Meanwhile, low and very-low risk zones occupy 68.64% of the total land area, and are primarily located in the high plateau and mountain regions in the northwest. We analyzed the risk level of each county and proposed risk mitigation measures based on field investigations. The verified risk assessment results were spatially consistent with the historical flood disaster records and loss positions, indicating the accuracy and reliability of the risk assessment map using the FSE approach. Compared with the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) TAR (Third Assessment Report) and AR5 (Fifth Assessment Report) methods, FSE has significant advantages in handling uncertainty, complexity, and the non-linear relationship between indices and risk grades. This study provides a novel quantitative method for flood risk assessment in metropolitan areas and practical implications for urban flood management.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangpeng Wang & Yong Liu & Ziying Hu & Yanli Lyu & Guoming Zhang & Jifu Liu & Yun Liu & Yu Gu & Xichen Huang & Hao Zheng & Qingyan Zhang & Zongze Tong & Chang Hong & Lianyou Liu, 2020. "Flood Risk Assessment Based on Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Method in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1451-:d:321125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stijn Temmerman & Patrick Meire & Tjeerd J. Bouma & Peter M. J. Herman & Tom Ysebaert & Huib J. De Vriend, 2013. "Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change," Nature, Nature, vol. 504(7478), pages 79-83, December.
    2. Xiao-ling Yang & Jie-hua Ding & Hui Hou, 2013. "Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 657-674, September.
    3. Stefanos Stefanidis & Dimitrios Stathis, 2013. "Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 569-585, September.
    4. Jonathan D. Woodruff & Jennifer L. Irish & Suzana J. Camargo, 2013. "Coastal flooding by tropical cyclones and sea-level rise," Nature, Nature, vol. 504(7478), pages 44-52, December.
    5. Chengguang Lai & Xiaohong Chen & Xiaoyu Chen & Zhaoli Wang & Xushu Wu & Shiwei Zhao, 2015. "A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1243-1259, June.
    6. Wu, Yunna & Jia, Weibing & Li, Lingwenying & Song, Zixin & Xu, Chuanbo & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Risk assessment of electric vehicle supply chain based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 397-411.
    7. José I. Barredo & Guy Engelen, 2010. "Land Use Scenario Modeling for Flood Risk Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Jim Hall & Paul Sayers & Richard Dawson, 2005. "National-scale Assessment of Current and Future Flood Risk in England and Wales," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 36(1), pages 147-164, September.
    9. Han, Baolong & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 217-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiskani, Izhar Mithal & Cai, Qingxiang & Zhou, Wei & Lu, Xiang, 2020. "Assessment of risks impeding sustainable mining in Pakistan using fuzzy synthetic evaluation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Wen-Cheng Liu & Tien-Hsiang Hsieh & Hong-Ming Liu, 2021. "Flood Risk Assessment in Urban Areas of Southern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Yanzheng Zhu & Yangbo Chen & Yanjun Zhao & Feng Zhou & Shichao Xu, 2023. "Application and Research of Liuxihe Model in the Simulation of Inflow Flood at Zaoshi Reservoir," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Jian Liu & Kangjie Wang & Shan Lv & Xiangtao Fan & Haixia He, 2023. "Flood Risk Assessment Based on a Cloud Model in Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Fan Zhang & Hongxia Yang & Shengbin Li, 2024. "A Multi-Project Evaluation of Engineering Students’ Performance for Online PBL: Taking the Sustainable Decision Analysis Course as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Zhang, Xin & Luo, Hao & Zeng, Xiaoyu & Zhou, Chenyi & Shu, Zhile & Li, Huayun & Fei, Zheng & Liu, Guichuan, 2024. "Research on regional economic development and natural disaster risk assessment under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality: A case study in Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chengguang Lai & Xiaohong Chen & Zhaoli Wang & Haijun Yu & Xiaoyan Bai, 2020. "Flood Risk Assessment and Regionalization from Past and Future Perspectives at Basin Scale," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1399-1417, July.
    2. Hao Chen & Zongxue Xu & Yang Liu & Yixuan Huang & Fang Yang, 2022. "Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on Dynamic Population Distribution and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Shanshan Hu & Xiangjun Cheng & Demin Zhou & Hong Zhang, 2017. "GIS-based flood risk assessment in suburban areas: a case study of the Fangshan District, Beijing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1525-1543, July.
    4. Reguero, Borja G. & Beck, Michael W. & Schmid, David & Stadtmüller, Daniel & Raepple, Justus & Schüssele, Stefan & Pfliegner, Kerstin, 2020. "Financing coastal resilience by combining nature-based risk reduction with insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Álvarez, Xana & Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2019. "Risk prevention of land flood: A cooperative game theory approach," MPRA Paper 91515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hong Lv & Xinjian Guan & Yu Meng, 2020. "Comprehensive evaluation of urban flood-bearing risks based on combined compound fuzzy matter-element and entropy weight model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 1823-1841, September.
    7. Kadriye Burcu Yavuz Kumlu & Şule Tüdeş, 2019. "Determination of earthquake-risky areas in Yalova City Center (Marmara region, Turkey) using GIS-based multicriteria decision-making techniques (analytical hierarchy process and technique for order pr," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 999-1018, April.
    8. Siddharth Narayan & Michael W Beck & Borja G Reguero & Iñigo J Losada & Bregje van Wesenbeeck & Nigel Pontee & James N Sanchirico & Jane Carter Ingram & Glenn-Marie Lange & Kelly A Burks-Copes, 2016. "The Effectiveness, Costs and Coastal Protection Benefits of Natural and Nature-Based Defences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Ireneusz Laks & Zbigniew Walczak, 2020. "Efficiency of Polder Modernization for Flood Protection. Case Study of Golina Polder (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Shubham Kumar & Preet Lal & Amit Kumar, 2020. "Turbulence of tropical cyclone ‘Fani’ in the Bay of Bengal and Indian subcontinent," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1613-1622, August.
    11. Kerim Koc & Zeynep Işık, 2020. "A multi-agent-based model for sustainable governance of urban flood risk mitigation measures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 1079-1110, October.
    12. Yan Nie & Guoxing Zhang, 2020. "Indicator system to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of China clean power systems," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1381-1401, October.
    13. Qiang Zou & Li Liao & Hui Qin, 2020. "Fast Comprehensive Flood Risk Assessment Based on Game Theory and Cloud Model Under Parallel Computation (P-GT-CM)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(5), pages 1625-1648, March.
    14. Enliang Guo & Jiquan Zhang & Xuehui Ren & Qi Zhang & Zhongyi Sun, 2014. "Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 947-965, November.
    15. Chengguang Lai & Xiaohong Chen & Xiaoyu Chen & Zhaoli Wang & Xushu Wu & Shiwei Zhao, 2015. "A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1243-1259, June.
    16. Mo Wang & Xiaoping Fu & Dongqing Zhang & Furong Chen & Jin Su & Shiqi Zhou & Jianjun Li & Yongming Zhong & Soon Keat Tan, 2023. "Urban Flooding Risk Assessment in the Rural-Urban Fringe Based on a Bayesian Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zongmin Li & Zeshui Xu, 2018. "Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Borja G Reguero & Michael W Beck & David N Bresch & Juliano Calil & Imen Meliane, 2018. "Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: A case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Liming Zhao & Ling Li & Yujie Wu, 2017. "Research on the Coupling Coordination of a Sea–Land System Based on an Integrated Approach and New Evaluation Index System: A Case Study in Hainan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    20. Jiayang Zhang & Yangbo Chen, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster Induced by Typhoon Rainstorms in Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1451-:d:321125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.