IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1329-d319504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Purchase Intention of Specialty Coffee

Author

Listed:
  • Patricio Ramírez-Correa

    (School of Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo, Coquimbo 1780000, Chile)

  • F. Javier Rondán-Cataluña

    (Department Business Management and Marketing, University of Seville, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 41018 Seville, Spain)

  • Maria Tereza Moulaz

    (Mercado do Café Brasília, Asa Sul, Brasília 70360530, Brazil)

  • Jorge Arenas-Gaitán

    (Department Business Management and Marketing, University of Seville, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 41018 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

The main aims of this study are: (1) to test whether the theory of planned behavior (TPB) is useful to explain the intention to purchase specialty coffee; (2) to analyze whether people more involved in social responsibility could manifest a different response from those not so interested in this matter concerning specialty coffee. The sample is composed of 489 specialty coffee consumers from Brazil. The statistical tool for testing the measurement and structural model was partial least squares. Then a multigroup analysis was performed to meet the second objective; the software SmartPLS was utilized. The main contributions of this study are that we can explain the intention to use specialty coffee in a sample of Brazilian consumers using the classical TPB model. Moreover, we demonstrate the moderating effect of consumer perception of corporate social responsibility in this general model.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricio Ramírez-Correa & F. Javier Rondán-Cataluña & Maria Tereza Moulaz & Jorge Arenas-Gaitán, 2020. "Purchase Intention of Specialty Coffee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1329-:d:319504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palmiro Poltronieri & Franca Rossi, 2016. "Challenges in Specialty Coffee Processing and Quality Assurance," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Bala Ramasamy & Mathew Yeung, 2009. "Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 119-132, April.
    3. Ramasamy, Bala & Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Chen, Junsong, 2013. "Selling to the urban Chinese in East Asia: Do CSR and value orientation matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2485-2491.
    4. Jae-Bin Cha & Mi-Na Jo, 2019. "The Effect of the Corporate Social Responsibility of Franchise Coffee Shops on Corporate Image and Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Vellema, W. & Buritica Casanova, A. & Gonzalez, C. & D’Haese, M., 2015. "The effect of specialty coffee certification on household livelihood strategies and specialisation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 13-25.
    7. David A Waldman & Mary Sully de Luque & Nathan Washburn & Robert J House & Bolanle Adetoun & Angel Barrasa & Mariya Bobina & Muzaffer Bodur & Yi-Jung Chen & Sukhendu Debbarma & Peter Dorfman & Rosemar, 2006. "Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 823-837, November.
    8. Dominik Zimon & Jonah Tyan & Robert Sroufe, 2019. "Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Maria Teresa Pereira & Florinda Figueiredo Martins & Dominik Zimon, 2018. "Assessment of Circular Economy within Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veenarat Ut-tha & Rebecca Chung, 2023. "Unraveling Psychosocial Drivers of Environmentally-labeled Coffee," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 109-141.
    2. Xin Shen & Xun Cao & Sonia Sadeghian Esfahani & Tayyaba Saleem, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Tamara Gajić & Jovanka Popov Raljić & Ivana Blešić & Milica Aleksić & Marko D. Petrović & Milan M. Radovanović & Darko B. Vuković & Višnja Sikimić & Tatjana Pivac & Marija Kostić & Dejan Sekulić & Dra, 2022. "Factors That Influence Sustainable Selection and Reselection Intentions Regarding Soluble/Instant Coffee—The Case of Serbian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luger, Michaela & Hofer, Katharina Maria & Floh, Arne, 2022. "Support for corporate social responsibility among generation Y consumers in advanced versus emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    2. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Eddy Ng & Ronald Burke, 2010. "Predictor of Business Students’ Attitudes Toward Sustainable Business Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 603-615, September.
    4. Hairui Wei & Anlin Li & Nana Jia, 2020. "Research on Optimization and Design of Sustainable Urban Underground Logistics Network Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Akrum Helfaya & Nasser Fathi Easa, 2022. "Islamic Religiosity and CSR Attitudes—The Case of Egyptian Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. repec:cte:wbrepe:wb130301 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Athanasios Lapatinas & Anastasia Litina & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2021. "The Impact of Economic Complexity on the Formation of Environmental Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Diana A. Londoño-Pulgarín & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Esmeralda Crespo-Almendros, 2020. "Conversion of Residential Heating Systems from Fossil Fuels to Biofuels: A Cross-Cultural Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Khuong N. Mai & Khuong N. Mai & Phuong N.D. Nguyen & Phuong N.D. Nguyen & An K.T. Nguyen & An K.T. Nguyen & Ngoc M. Tran & Ngoc M. Tran, 2020. "The effects of managerial perceptions on CSR practices and corporate financial performance: an evidence from Vietnam," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 858-874, December.
    10. Alvaro Lleo & Miquel Bastons & Carlos Rey & Fernando Ruiz-Perez, 2021. "Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Maria Anne Schmidt & Daniel Cracau, 2015. "Cross-Country Comparison of the Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation in Germany and Qatar: An Empirical Study among Business Students," FEMM Working Papers 150006, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    12. Ramasamy, Bala & Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Chen, Junsong, 2013. "Selling to the urban Chinese in East Asia: Do CSR and value orientation matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2485-2491.
    13. Yiling Fang & Xinhui Wang & Jinjiang Yan, 2020. "Green Product Pricing and Order Strategies in a Supply Chain under Demand Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    16. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    17. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    18. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    20. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    21. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1329-:d:319504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.