IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p679-d309883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To What Extent Can the Green Belts Prevent Urban Sprawl?—A Comparative Study of Frankfurt am Main, London and Seoul

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoping Xie

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Hanna Kang

    (Dresden Leibniz Graduate School, Technical University of Dresden, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Martin Behnisch

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Martin Baildon

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan)

  • Tobias Krüger

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

A salient issue facing contemporary urban development in many countries is that the physical areas of major cities are growing at a faster rate than their populations. The popularity of the green belt concept among advocates is that it can effectively counter urban sprawl while safeguarding the countryside from urban development. This paper is intended to measure the efficacy of the green belt in preventing urban sprawl through an international comparative study in three cities of different sizes, and which have experienced different urban growth pressures, namely Frankfurt am Main (Germany), London (UK), and Seoul (South Korea). The study adopts the urban sprawl measurement methodological framework defined by Jaeger et al. to process GHSL data in order to examine the urban sprawl index in the three case study cities. This quantitative evidence-based comparative study demonstrates that the designation of green belts has failed to prevent urban sprawl both within urban centers and at a wider regional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoping Xie & Hanna Kang & Martin Behnisch & Martin Baildon & Tobias Krüger, 2020. "To What Extent Can the Green Belts Prevent Urban Sprawl?—A Comparative Study of Frankfurt am Main, London and Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:679-:d:309883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Monk & Christine M. E. Whitehead, 1999. "Evaluating the Economic Impact of Planning Controls in the United Kingdom: Some Implications for Housing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 75(1), pages 74-93.
    2. C-M Lee & M Fujita, 1997. "Efficient Configuration of a Greenbelt: Theoretical Modelling of Greenbelt Amenity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(11), pages 1999-2017, November.
    3. Jae Ik Kim & Jun Yong Hyun & Seom Gyeol Lee, 2019. "The Effects of Releasing Greenbelt Restrictions on Land Development in the Case of Medium-Sized Cities in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Son, Jae-Young & Kim, Kyung-Hwan, 1998. "Analysis of Urban Land Shortages: The Case of Korean Cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 362-384, May.
    5. Chang‐Moo Lee & Peter Linneman, 1998. "Dynamics of the Greenbelt Amenity Effect on the Land Market—The Case of Seoul's Greenbelt," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 107-129, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongkwan Lee & Choongik Choi, 2021. "An Analysis of the Effects of Development-Restricted Areas on Land Price Using Spatial Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Blanca González-Méndez & Christina Scarpitti & Bo Yang & Joaquin Murrieta Saldivar & Irene Pineda & Guadalupe Peñúñuri & Eduardo Hinojosa Robles & Kassandra Soto Irineo & Ser, 2022. "Green Belt Implementation in Arid Lands through Soil Reconditioning and Landscape Design: The Case of Hermosillo, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Fangzhi Zhan & Zhicheng Liu & Boya Wang, 2023. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the “Contraction–Expansion” Change of the Boundary Area between Two Green Belts in Beijing Based on a Multi-Index System," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Jiaying Zhang & Yi Chen & Xuhong Yang & Wenyi Qiao & Danyang Wang, 2022. "The Demarcation of Urban Development Boundary Based on the Maxent-CA Model: A Case Study of Wuxi in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Abdulaziz Aldegheishem, 2023. "Urban Growth Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: An Assessment of Technical Policy Instruments and Institutional Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Yuneng Jiang & Yi Zhu & Yasi Tian, 2023. "Measuring the Urban Sprawl of a Mega-Urban Agglomeration Area Based on Multi-Dimensions with a Mechanical Equilibrium Model: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Hernik, Józef, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Ik Kim & Jun Yong Hyun & Seom Gyeol Lee, 2019. "The Effects of Releasing Greenbelt Restrictions on Land Development in the Case of Medium-Sized Cities in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Anas, Alex & Rhee, Hyok-Joo, 2006. "Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 510-541, July.
    3. Anas, Alex & Pines, David, 2008. "Anti-sprawl policies in a system of congested cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 408-423, September.
    4. Myung-Jin Jun, 2012. "The effects of Seoul’s greenbelt on the spatial distribution of population and employment, and on the real estate market," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(3), pages 619-642, December.
    5. Bun Song Lee & John F. McDonald, 2003. "Determinants of Commuting Time and Distance for Seoul Residents: The Impact of Family Status on the Commuting of Women," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(7), pages 1283-1302, June.
    6. Lina O Anderson & Samantha De Martino & Torfinn Harding & Karlygash Kuralbayeva & Andre Lima, 2016. "The Effects of Land Use Regulation on Deforestation:," OxCarre Working Papers 172, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    7. Wouter Vermeulen & Jan Rouwendal, 2008. "Urban Expansion or Clustered Deconcentration?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-043/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. H. Allen Klaiber & Joshua K. Abbott & V. Kerry Smith, 2017. "Some Like It (Less) Hot: Extracting Trade-Off Measures for Physically Coupled Amenities," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1053-1079.
    9. Mingfei Ma & Ying Jin, 2019. "Economic impacts of alternative greenspace configurations in fast growing cities: The case of Greater Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1498-1515, June.
    10. Bergstrom, John C., 1998. "Exploring And Expanding The Landscape Values Terrain," Faculty Series 16653, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Coisnon, Thomas & Oueslati, Walid & Salanié, Julien, 2014. "Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 38-49.
    12. Jeon, Jae Sik, 2019. "How housing market responds to greenbelt relaxation: Case of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 328-334.
    13. Cheshire, Paul & Sheppard, Stephen, 2002. "The welfare economics of land use planning," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 242-269, September.
    14. Felix SK Agyemang & Nicky Morrison, 2018. "Recognising the barriers to securing affordable housing through the land use planning system in Sub-Saharan Africa: A perspective from Ghana," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2640-2659, September.
    15. Yingying Tian & Guanghui Jiang & Yaya Tian, 2024. "A New Endogenous–Exogenous Factor Framework to Analyze China’s Distinctive Land Supply Participation in Macro-Control Processes During the 2001–2021 Period," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Cheshire, Paul, 2009. "Urban land markets and policy failures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30837, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Bun Lee & Eui-Chul Chung & Yong Kim, 2004. "Dwelling Age, Redevelopment, and Housing Prices: The Case of Apartment Complexes in Seoul," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 55-80, October.
    18. Monique DANTAS & Frédéric GASCHET & Guillaume POUYANNE, 2010. "Regulatory zoning and coastal housing prices: a bayesian hedonic approach (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2010-12, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    19. Guillaume POUYANNE & Frederic GASCHET, 2013. "The Effect Of Current And Future Land Use On House Prices," ERSA conference papers ersa13p249, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Richard J. Vyn, 2012. "Examining for Evidence of the Leapfrog Effect in the Context of Strict Agricultural Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(3), pages 457-477.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:679-:d:309883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.