IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1621-d1219458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the “Contraction–Expansion” Change of the Boundary Area between Two Green Belts in Beijing Based on a Multi-Index System

Author

Listed:
  • Fangzhi Zhan

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhicheng Liu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Boya Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

In serving as a pivotal strategy for curbing urban sprawl, large-scale urban green belts, being a significant constituent of the urban green space, have been ubiquitously employed in the scheming and fabrication of green space systems in global megacities. Nevertheless, the disregard for research into the independent alteration mechanism of urban green space, coupled with the reactive approach of planning and construction and the singularity of quantitative indices, has engendered challenges in the creation of urban green belts. This paper presents an investigation into the juncture zone of two green belts in Beijing as a case study, erecting a “contraction–expansion” flux model of its green space and gauging the transformational traits of the green space in light of its spatial–temporal evolution with regards to its quantity, space, and connectivity among others. Findings reveal that between 2005 and 2012, the green space in Beijing underwent an approximately 20% alteration, with the green belt intersection zone’s green space area experiencing a dual trajectory shift of “expansion-contraction”. This shift was primarily characterized by expansion before 2015 and contraction from 2015 onwards. Concerning spatial attributes, patterns of expansion and aggregation were discernible in scattered distribution, whereas contraction and aggregation were evident in mass and spaced distribution. Spatial stability was influenced by the change model, marked by a shift in the center of gravity from a “north-south-east” orientation to a “northwest-southeast” direction. At the connectivity stratum, noticeable variations were witnessed in both the overall and local connectivity levels pre- and post-2015. Regarding individual connectivity, three vital nodes of stable linear connectivity were identified, playing a decisive role in defining the dispersion of crucial corridors within the area of study.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangzhi Zhan & Zhicheng Liu & Boya Wang, 2023. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the “Contraction–Expansion” Change of the Boundary Area between Two Green Belts in Beijing Based on a Multi-Index System," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1621-:d:1219458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoping Xie & Hanna Kang & Martin Behnisch & Martin Baildon & Tobias Krüger, 2020. "To What Extent Can the Green Belts Prevent Urban Sprawl?—A Comparative Study of Frankfurt am Main, London and Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Mingruo Chu & Jiayi Lu & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Influence of Urban Agglomeration Expansion on Fragmentation of Green Space: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Hernik, Józef, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Blanca González-Méndez & Christina Scarpitti & Bo Yang & Joaquin Murrieta Saldivar & Irene Pineda & Guadalupe Peñúñuri & Eduardo Hinojosa Robles & Kassandra Soto Irineo & Ser, 2022. "Green Belt Implementation in Arid Lands through Soil Reconditioning and Landscape Design: The Case of Hermosillo, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Hao Li & Hongyu Chen & Minghao Wu & Kai Zhou & Xiang Zhang & Zhicheng Liu, 2022. "A Dynamic Evaluation Method of Urban Ecological Networks Combining Graphab and the FLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Dongkwan Lee & Choongik Choi, 2021. "An Analysis of the Effects of Development-Restricted Areas on Land Price Using Spatial Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Xuebin Zhang & Litang Yao & Jun Luo & Wenjuan Liang, 2022. "Exploring Changes in Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in Key Regions of the Belt and Road Initiative Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Hao Ye & Yongyong Song & Dongqian Xue, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use and Habitat Quality in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Liang, Fachao & Zhu, Runmiao & Lin, Sheng-Hau, 2023. "Exploring spatial relationship between landscape configuration and ecosystem services: A case study of Xiamen–Zhangzhou–Quanzhou in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    8. Jiaying Zhang & Yi Chen & Xuhong Yang & Wenyi Qiao & Danyang Wang, 2022. "The Demarcation of Urban Development Boundary Based on the Maxent-CA Model: A Case Study of Wuxi in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Bo Li & Yue Wang & Tong Wang & Xiaoman He & Jan K. Kazak, 2022. "Scenario Analysis for Resilient Urban Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Yingting He & Chuyu Xia & Zhuang Shao & Jing Zhao, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Yuneng Jiang & Yi Zhu & Yasi Tian, 2023. "Measuring the Urban Sprawl of a Mega-Urban Agglomeration Area Based on Multi-Dimensions with a Mechanical Equilibrium Model: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Luhui Qi & Liqi Jia & Yubin Luo & Yuanyi Chen & Minggang Peng, 2022. "The External Characteristics and Mechanism of Urban Road Corridors to Agglomeration: Case Study for Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Tianqi Li & Hua Xue & Xin Chen & Yanhui Yan & Ran Ma, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Abdulaziz Aldegheishem, 2023. "Urban Growth Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: An Assessment of Technical Policy Instruments and Institutional Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Wen Zhou & Yantao Xi & Liang Zhai & Cheng Li & Jingyang Li & Wei Hou, 2023. "Zoning for Spatial Conservation and Restoration Based on Ecosystem Services in Highly Urbanized Region: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Xiang Li & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Yingxue Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use Impacts on Habitat Quality in Tianjin Based on the PLUS Model Coupled with the InVEST Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1621-:d:1219458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.