IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p445-d305858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Drinking Bars in China: Evidence, Initiatives, and Guidelines Based on the 2030 Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanbo Li

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Institute for Sustainable Development Goals, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

China is a fascinating market in terms of alcohol consumption. Although drinking bars originated in the West, economic and societal developments have spread the concept throughout China. In 2017, there were approximately 59,600 drinking bars in China, with a 44.06 billion RMB market size. Given societal development, the Chinese bar industry has gradually paid attention to environmental protection and sustainable development. A sustainable bar adopts a management model that reduces and recycles waste and saves energy. The social responsibility of bars is reflected in sustainable consumption. The concept of sustainable bars has been well-received worldwide. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2030 Agenda) provides direction on sustainable development to relevant stakeholders. The 2030 Agenda contains 17 interactive Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including the SDG12. Thus, it is important to explore the development of Chinese sustainable bars under the 2030 Agenda and the 17 SDGs. Hence, the Institute for Sustainable Development Goals (TUSDG) of Tsinghua University, Pernod Ricard China, and Kantar China organized one tripartite research group and conducted investigations on drinking bars from three megacities (Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing) to explore the situation, recognition, perspectives, and actions of sustainable bars in China. The results have significant implications. Moreover, the three parties jointly released the “Sustainable Bar Operation Initiatives” and the “Operational Sustainable Bar Application Guidelines” for the bar industry in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanbo Li, 2020. "Sustainable Drinking Bars in China: Evidence, Initiatives, and Guidelines Based on the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:445-:d:305858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/445/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/445/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Shao, 2019. "Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1507-1517, December.
    2. Yuanbo Li & Xufeng Zhu, 2019. "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America and the Caribbean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Han Lin & Ernesto Tavoletti, 2013. "The Marketing of Italian Wine Brands in China: The ‘Mainstreaming’ Approach," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(2), pages 221-237, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    2. Hye Jung Jung & Yun Jung Choi & Kyung Wha Oh, 2020. "Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Shehawy, Yasser Moustafa, 2023. "In green consumption, why consumers do not walk their talk: A cross cultural examination from Saudi Arabia and UK," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Jianfang Liang & Jingjun Li & Xuerong Cao & Zejun Zhang, 2024. "Generational Differences in Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Chinese Residents: Implications Based on Perceptions of Sustainable Consumption and Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Song Wang & Yuyao Cao & Yifan Wang & Chaoquan Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Innovative and Low-Carbon Pilot Cities on Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. María del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & José Miguel Rodríguez‐Antón & Llorenç Bagur‐Femenías & Jordi Perramon, 2020. "Sustainable development and circular economy: The role of institutional promotion on circular consumption and market competitiveness from a multistakeholder engagement approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2803-2814, September.
    8. Xiaocheng Vicky Zhang & Suk Ha Grace Chan, 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Qing, Ping & Hu, Wuyang, 2016. "Chinese Consumer Preference for Red Wine Attributes," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235477, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Han, Myat Su & Hampson, Daniel Peter & Wang, Yonggui & Wang, Hong, 2022. "Consumer confidence and green purchase intention: An application of the stimulus-organism-response model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Jinguang Guo & Chenglai Yang, 2024. "Sustainable Consumption and Residents’ Happiness: An Empirical Analysis Based on the 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Jing Shao & Wenchao Li & Cedric Aneye & Wei Fang, 2022. "Facilitating mechanism of green products purchasing with a premium price—Moderating by sustainability‐related information," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 686-700, May.
    13. Ahmad Saad & Guan Xinping & Mariah Ijaz, 2019. "China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Its Influence on Perceived Economic and Social Goals: Implications for Social Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Marc Dressler & Ivan Paunovic, 2021. "A Typology of Winery SME Brand Strategies with Implications for Sustainability Communication and Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Wang, Zhihao & Li, Wei & Wang, Mengxin, 2024. "Exploring the social diffusion effects of green consumption: Evidence from green innovative products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Weiwei Shang & Run Zhu & Weiwei Liu & Qian Liu, 2024. "Understanding the Influences on Green Purchase Intention with Moderation by Sustainability Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Zivar Zeynalova & Natavan Namazova, 2022. "Revealing Consumer Behavior toward Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Giulia Sesini & Cinzia Castiglioni & Edoardo Lozza, 2020. "New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Nimni Pannila & Madushan Madhava Jayalath & Amila Thibbotuwawa & Izabela Nielsen & T.G.G. Uthpala, 2022. "Challenges in Applying Circular Economy Concepts to Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Yue‐Jun Zhang & Wei Shi & Lin Jiang, 2020. "Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 872-885, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:445-:d:305858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.