IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10692-d465982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Assessment of Different Modelling Schemes and Their Applicability to Inland Small Reservoirs: A Central Europe Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Pelikán

    (Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Věra Hubačíková

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Tatiana Kaletová

    (Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Hospodárska 7, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Jakub Fuska

    (Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Hospodárska 7, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia)

Abstract

Sustainable landscape management involve also water reservoir management. The demand of their reconstruction represents a good opportunity for redesigning hydrotechnical structures and their parameters using recent methods and models. The estimation of wind-driven waves on small water reservoirs and their effects on water reservoir structures rarely are applied, although it is an important part of the dam height calculation. The analysis of wave run-up on the upstream face of the dam was performed by means of the Slovak Technical Standard (STN), Coastal Engineering Manual (CEM), Shore Protection Manual (SPM) and model designed by American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE). The estimations of the wave characteristics differ depending on the model; wave height ( H 13% ) within the range 0.32–0.56 m, wave period 1.32–2.11 s and run-up ( R 2% ) 0.84–1.68 m under conditions of design wind speed 25 m·s −1 . Results obtained by CEM, SPM models predict lower values than STN and ASABE models. Since the height difference between the dam crest and still water level in the reservoir is only 0.90 m, we can expect overtopping of the crest by waves after the critical wind speed is exceeded.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Pelikán & Věra Hubačíková & Tatiana Kaletová & Jakub Fuska, 2020. "Comparative Assessment of Different Modelling Schemes and Their Applicability to Inland Small Reservoirs: A Central Europe Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10692-:d:465982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue Zhong & Xiaohui Jiang & Leilei Li & Jing Xu & Huanyu Xu, 2020. "The Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on Sediment Load: A Case Study of the Yanhe River Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Omar Farrok & Koushik Ahmed & Abdirazak Dahir Tahlil & Mohamud Mohamed Farah & Mahbubur Rahman Kiran & Md. Rabiul Islam, 2020. "Electrical Power Generation from the Oceanic Wave for Sustainable Advancement in Renewable Energy Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milan Daus & Katharina Koberger & Kaan Koca & Felix Beckers & Jorge Encinas Fernández & Barbara Weisbrod & Daniel Dietrich & Sabine Ulrike Gerbersdorf & Rüdiger Glaser & Stefan Haun & Hilmar Hofmann &, 2021. "Interdisciplinary Reservoir Management—A Tool for Sustainable Water Resources Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hendra Hendra & Dhimas Satria & Hernadewita Hernadewita & Yozerizal Yozerizal & Frengki Hardian & Ahmed M. Galal, 2023. "Performance of Generator Translation and Rotation on Stroke Length Drive of the Two-Rod Mechanism in Renewable Energy Power Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Berrio, Y. & Rivillas-Ospina, G. & Ruiz-Martínez, G. & Arango-Manrique, A. & Ricaurte, C. & Mendoza, E. & Silva, R. & Casas, D. & Bolívar, M. & Díaz, K., 2023. "Energy conversion and beach protection: Numerical assessment of a dual-purpose WEC farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    3. V., Vipin & Koley, Santanu, 2022. "Mathematical modeling of a submerged piezoelectric wave energy converter device installed over an undulated seabed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1382-1392.
    4. Sanja Manojlović & Mikica Sibinović & Tanja Srejić & Abosa Hadud & Ibrahim Sabri, 2021. "Agriculture Land Use Change and Demographic Change in Response to Decline Suspended Sediment in Južna Morava River Basin (Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Wei Yu & Ruiyang Ma & Darui Xu & Lei Huang & Shixiang Wang, 2023. "A Novel Multiport Hybrid Wave Energy System for Grid-Connected and Off-Grid Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. He, Lipeng & Liu, Renwen & Liu, Xuejin & Zhang, Zheng & Zhang, Limin & Cheng, Guangming, 2023. "A novel piezoelectric wave energy harvester based on cylindrical-conical buoy structure and magnetic coupling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 397-407.
    7. Guangming Tan & Shasha Han & Yuecong Yu & Rui Hu & Yiwei Lv & Caiwen Shu, 2021. "Impact of Social and Economic Development on Sediment Load of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Budi Azhari & Fransisco Danang Wijaya & Edwar Yazid, 2021. "Performance of Linear Generator Designs for Direct Drive Wave Energy Converter under Unidirectional Long-Crested Random Waves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Rahman, Abidur & Farrok, Omar & Haque, Md Mejbaul, 2022. "Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Mariam Gómez Sánchez & Yunesky Masip Macia & Alejandro Fernández Gil & Carlos Castro & Suleivys M. Nuñez González & Jacqueline Pedrera Yanes, 2020. "A Mathematical Model for the Optimization of Renewable Energy Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Kushal A. Prasad & Aneesh A. Chand & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Sumesh Narayan & Kabir A. Mamun, 2022. "A Critical Review of Power Take-Off Wave Energy Technology Leading to the Conceptual Design of a Novel Wave-Plus-Photon Energy Harvester for Island/Coastal Communities’ Energy Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-55, February.
    12. Fatemehsadat Mirshafiee & Emad Shahbazi & Mohadeseh Safi & Rituraj Rituraj, 2023. "Predicting Power and Hydrogen Generation of a Renewable Energy Converter Utilizing Data-Driven Methods: A Sustainable Smart Grid Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Álvaro González Lorente & Montserrat Hernández López & Francisco Javier Martín Álvarez & Javier Mendoza Jiménez, 2020. "Differences in Electricity Generation from Renewable Sources from Similar Environmental Conditions: The Cases of Spain and Cuba," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Shao-En Chen & Ray-Yeng Yang & Zeng-Hui Qiu & Chia-Che Wu, 2021. "A Piezoelectric Wave Energy Harvester Using Plucking-Driven and Frequency Up-Conversion Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10692-:d:465982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.