IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10427-d461477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of China’s Iron Trade Flow: Quantity, Value and Regional Pattern

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxi Chen

    (School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jiansu Mao

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation & Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Hezhong Tian

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation & Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Iron is an important metal material that supports the development of society and national economies. Due to the uneven distribution of resources, there is frequent trade around the world. Therefore, mastering the global flow path and trade pattern provides an essential basis for the sustainable utilization of iron and related products. Based on the artificial flow of iron in international trade, this study used the material flow analysis method to investigate this flow. Based on the data of China’s international iron trade from China Customs and the United Nations trade administration, this study systematically analyzed the structure, type, quantity, and value of iron-containing commodities in 2018. The results were as follows: (1) China was a net importer of iron and formed a trade structure of “import raw materials and export products.” (2) There was a large trade surplus in China’s iron international trade. The quality of iron exported by China was high, and the price is relatively low; therefore, countries around the world have a great dependence on the iron imported from China. (3) Compared with developed countries, China is in urgent need of high-end technologies and can only import high-tech iron products from abroad. Therefore, the value of China’s exports of iron-containing commodities is relatively low, while that of its imports is relatively high.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxi Chen & Jiansu Mao & Hezhong Tian, 2020. "Analysis of China’s Iron Trade Flow: Quantity, Value and Regional Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10427-:d:461477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremiah Johnson & T. E. Graedel, 2008. "The “Hidden” Trade of Metals in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 12(5-6), pages 739-753, October.
    2. Yin, Xiang & Chen, Wenying, 2013. "Trends and development of steel demand in China: A bottom–up analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 407-415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pablo Alonso-Fernández & Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira, 2021. "An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kermeli, Katerina & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Worrell, Ernst, 2022. "Improving material projections in Integrated Assessment Models: The use of a stock-based versus a flow-based approach for the iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    2. Le Boulzec, Hugo & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Verzier, François & Vidal, Olivier & Mathy, Sandrine, 2022. "Dynamic modeling of global fossil fuel infrastructure and materials needs: Overcoming a lack of available data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. McMillan, Colin A. & Moore, Michael R. & Keoleian, Gregory A. & Bulkley, Jonathan W., 2010. "Quantifying U.S. aluminum in-use stocks and their relationship with economic output," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2606-2613, October.
    4. Li, Nan & Ma, Ding & Chen, Wenying, 2017. "Quantifying the impacts of decarbonisation in China’s cement sector: A perspective from an integrated assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1840-1848.
    5. Zhongxin Ni & Xing Lu & Wenjun Xue, 2021. "Does the belt and road initiative resolve the steel overcapacity in China? Evidence from a dynamic model averaging approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 279-307, July.
    6. Shao, Tianming & Pan, Xunzhang & Li, Xiang & Zhou, Sheng & Zhang, Shu & Chen, Wenying, 2022. "China's industrial decarbonization in the context of carbon neutrality: A sub-sectoral analysis based on integrated modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2016. "Emission reduction of China׳s steel industry: Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 319-327.
    8. Li, Nan & Chen, Wenying, 2018. "Modeling China’s interprovincial coal transportation under low carbon transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 267-279.
    9. Qian Zhang & Christopher Kennedy & Tao Wang & Wendong Wei & Jiashuo Li & Lei Shi, 2020. "Transforming the coal and steel nexus for China's eco‐civilization: Interplay between rail and energy infrastructure," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1352-1363, December.
    10. Liu, Junling & Wang, Ke & Zou, Ji & Kong, Ying, 2019. "The implications of coal consumption in the power sector for China’s CO2 peaking target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Ren, Shuai & Li, Huajiao & Wang, Yanli & Guo, Chen & Feng, Sida & Wang, Xingxing, 2021. "Comparative study of the China and U.S. import trade structure based on the global chromium ore trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Huan Wang & Wenying Chen & Hongjun Zhang & Nan Li, 2020. "Modeling of power sector decarbonization in China: comparisons of early and delayed mitigation towards 2-degree target," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1843-1856, October.
    13. Ma, Ding & Chen, Wenying & Yin, Xiang & Wang, Lining, 2016. "Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China’s steel sector: An integrated assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1225-1237.
    14. Li, Nan & Chen, Wenying & Zhang, Qiang, 2020. "Development of China TIMES-30P model and its application to model China's provincial low carbon transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Shi, Jingcheng & Chen, Wenying & Yin, Xiang, 2016. "Modelling building’s decarbonization with application of China TIMES model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1303-1312.
    16. Wang, Huan & Chen, Wenying & Shi, Jingcheng, 2018. "Low carbon transition of global building sector under 2- and 1.5-degree targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-157.
    17. Xuan Yanni & Yue Qiang, 2016. "Retrospective and Prospective Analysis on the Trends of China’s Steel Production," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 4(4), pages 291-306, August.
    18. Wu, Jinxi & Yang, Jie & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Shen, Xuesi, 2016. "A system analysis of the development strategy of iron ore in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 32-40.
    19. Wei-Qiang Chen & Zi-Jie Ma & Stefan Pauliuk & Tao Wang, 2019. "Physical and Monetary Methods for Estimating the Hidden Trade of Materials," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Eheliyagoda, Disna & Li, Jinhui & Geng, Yong & Zeng, Xianlai, 2022. "The role of China's aluminum recycling on sustainable resource and emission pathways," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10427-:d:461477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.