IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10315-d459848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Technical Assessment of Comfort Performance of Hanok Using Comparative Field Surveys between Experts and Users

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Hyang Lee

    (University-Industry Liaison Office, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea)

  • Deuk-Youm Cheon

    (School of Architecture, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea)

  • Seung-Hoon Han

    (School of Architecture, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea)

Abstract

The paper aims to evaluate the psychological factors of the comfort performance of the hanok . This is to guide restoration and improvement in consideration of the intangible variables that provide the quality of the hanok . Through this process, we ultimately intend to build an integrated residential performance evaluation system that includes factors related to the quality of residents’ lives, such as the comfort of their surrounding and indoor environment, as well as the functionality and convenience of the hanok , a representative type of Korean traditional architecture. The test method to evaluate the comfort performance of hanok is largely divided into the physical perception element, which is a quantitative indicator, and the psychological cognitive element, which is a qualitative indicator. Physical perceptive factors are composed of nine quantifiable factors that can be measured by numerical values, namely humidity control, condensation, insulation, thermal comfort, air permeability, solar radiation, solar lighting, sound insulation, and air cleanness. This is a perceptual concept of viewing a building as it is, and a quantitative evaluation method of measuring data in the field using environmental sensors and equipment. Psychological cognitive factors that are evaluated based on the experiences of users (residents) living in hanok , are classified into five categories, of scenery, beauty, deodorization, usability, and health. This study was conducted through a questionnaire between experts and users (residents), limited to the psychological factors among methods of evaluating the comfort performance of hanok . As a result, it can be seen that environmental factors are the main variables that influence the degree of satisfaction with the psychological perception factor. This might be a merit factor of general hanok , and weight could be given when creating an integrated standard in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Hyang Lee & Deuk-Youm Cheon & Seung-Hoon Han, 2020. "A Technical Assessment of Comfort Performance of Hanok Using Comparative Field Surveys between Experts and Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10315-:d:459848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuan Liu & Qiancheng Wang & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Hung-Lin Chi & Yaotian Ma & Izzy Yi Jian, 2020. "Psychological and Demographic Factors Affecting Household Energy-Saving Intentions: A TPB-Based Study in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Jaewook Lee & Jiyoung Park, 2018. "Phase Change Material (PCM) Application in a Modernized Korean Traditional House (Hanok)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Shady Attia, 2020. "Spatial and Behavioral Thermal Adaptation in Net Zero Energy Buildings: An Exploratory Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Go-Eun Kim & Jeong-Ran Lee, 2020. "The Impact of Historic Building Preservation in Urban Economics: Focusing on Accommodation Prices in Jeonju Hanok Village, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seung-Ju Choe & Seung-Hoon Han, 2021. "Applicability of Assessment Indices for Hanok-User Sensory Comfort Based on Visual and Tactile Comfort Evaluation Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meles, Tensay Hadush & Ryan, Lisa & Mukherjee, Sanghamitra C., 2022. "Heterogeneity in preferences for renewable home heating systems among Irish households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Qian-Cheng Wang & Yi-Xuan Wang & Izzy Yi Jian & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Xuan Liu & Yao-Tian Ma, 2020. "Exploring the “Energy-Saving Personality Traits” in the Office and Household Situation: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Attia, Shady & Canonge, Théophile & Popineau, Mathieu & Cuchet, Mathilde, 2022. "Developing a benchmark model for renovated, nearly zero-energy, terraced dwellings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    4. Jonghoon Ahn, 2020. "Improvement of the Performance Balance between Thermal Comfort and Energy Use for a Building Space in the Mid-Spring Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Olawale Fatoki, 2022. "Determinants of Employee Electricity Saving Behavior in Small Firms: The Role of Benefits and Leadership," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Li, Y. & Arulnathan, V. & Heidari, M.D. & Pelletier, N., 2022. "Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Troy Malatesta & Gregory M. Morrison & Jessica K. Breadsell & Christine Eon, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Interplay between Renewable Energy Systems and Occupant Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Li, Tong & Wang, Zhaohua & Zhao, Wenhui, 2022. "Comparison and application potential analysis of autoencoder-based electricity pattern mining algorithms for large-scale demand response," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Timothy O. Adekunle, 2023. "Occupants’ Perceptions of Comfort, Control, and Adaptation in Colonial Revival Style Residences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Karami, Mahdi & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Business models for peer-to-peer energy trading in Germany based on households’ beliefs and preferences," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    11. Jin-Li Hu & Min-Yueh Chuang, 2023. "The Importance of Energy Prosumers for Affordable and Clean Energy Development: A Review of the Literature from the Viewpoints of Management and Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Alettin Irmak & Nurlan Kurmanov & Onaikhan Zhadigerova & Zukhra Turdiyeva & Aigul Bakirbekova & Gaukhar Saimagambetova & Assilbek Baidakov & Aigul Mukhamejanova & Madina Tolysbayeva & Sagyngali Seitzh, 2023. "Shaping Energy-Saving Behavior in Education System: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 46-60, July.
    13. Domenico Mazzeo & Giuseppe Oliveti, 2020. "Advanced Innovative Solutions for Final Design in Terms of Energy Sustainability of Nearly/Net Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-5, December.
    14. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2020. "Relationship between education and households? electricity-saving behaviour in South Africa: A multilevel logistic analysis," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(2), pages 51-74.
    15. Mohamed Elhadi Matallah & Djamel Alkama & Jacques Teller & Atef Ahriz & Shady Attia, 2021. "Quantification of the Outdoor Thermal Comfort within Different Oases Urban Fabrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Ma, Yuan & Liu, Changshan, 2023. "Configuration analysis of influencing factors of energy-saving behaviors: From the perspective of consumers’ pro-environmental characteristics and environmentally friendly social atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    17. J. K. Perret & V. Udalov & N. Fabisch, 2022. "Motivations behind individuals’ energy efficiency investments and daily energy-saving behavior: The case of China," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 129-155, February.
    18. Mohamed Elhadi Matallah & Waqas Ahmed Mahar & Mushk Bughio & Djamel Alkama & Atef Ahriz & Soumia Bouzaher, 2021. "Prediction of Climate Change Effect on Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Guirec Ruellan & Mario Cools & Shady Attia, 2021. "Analysis of the Determining Factors for the Renovation of the Walloon Residential Building Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Sylwia Słupik & Joanna Kos-Łabędowicz & Joanna Trzęsiok, 2021. "Are You a Typical Energy Consumer? Socioeconomic Characteristics of Behavioural Segmentation Representatives of 8 European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10315-:d:459848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.