IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9029-d437446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact of Fresh Tomato Production in an Urban Rooftop Greenhouse in a Humid Continental Climate in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Israel Torres Pineda

    (Environmental Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Jeong Hwa Cho

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
    Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Dongkeun Lee

    (Environmental Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Sang Min Lee

    (Environmental Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Sangseok Yu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea)

  • Young Duk Lee

    (Environmental Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

Abstract

In this work, we used life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the environmental impact of fresh tomato production using a conventional greenhouse (GH) located in a rural area versus a rooftop greenhouse (RTG) located in an urban area in South Korea. The heating and cooling loads were modeled for a period of 12 months using the simulation software TRNSYS. The comparative LCA was then performed for the GH and RTG using these data. It was found that 19% less energy is required for heating an RTG and 38% more energy is used for cooling compared with a GH. Nevertheless, the total energy load reduction for the RTG is 13%. This decreased energy consumption is due to smaller heat losses of the RTG during the colder months. The decreased energy load, combined with the elimination of transportation, storage, and handling losses during the distribution stage, resulted in 43% less global warming potential, 45% less cumulative energy demand and abiotic depletion, 37% less photochemical oxidation and acidification, and 27% less eutrophication for the RTG. Further studies with seasonal yield data, energy sources, and integrated energy flows are expected to provide a better understanding of the advantages of urban farming in this region.

Suggested Citation

  • Israel Torres Pineda & Jeong Hwa Cho & Dongkeun Lee & Sang Min Lee & Sangseok Yu & Young Duk Lee, 2020. "Environmental Impact of Fresh Tomato Production in an Urban Rooftop Greenhouse in a Humid Continental Climate in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9029-:d:437446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miika P. Marttila & Ville Uusitalo & Lassi Linnanen & Mirja H. Mikkilä, 2021. "Agro-Industrial Symbiosis and Alternative Heating Systems for Decreasing the Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Drottberger, Annie & Zhang, Yizhi & Yong, Jean Wan Hong & Dubois, Marie-Claude, 2023. "Urban farming with rooftop greenhouses: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Donald Coon & Lauren Lindow & Ziynet Boz & Ana Martin-Ryals & Ying Zhang & Melanie Correll, 2024. "Reporting and practices of sustainability in controlled environment agriculture: a scoping review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 301-326, June.
    4. Sukjoon Oh & Juan-Carlos Baltazar & Jeff S. Haberl, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Using a Smart Thermostat and Smart Meter Data on a Whole-Building Energy Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9029-:d:437446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.