IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8673-d431347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Key Carbon Emission Sectors and Analysis of Emission Effects in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongke Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, No.100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yixing Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, No.100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yuanying Chi

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, No.100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Feng Jin

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, No.100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Analysis of sectors’ emission effects is crucial for identifying key emission sectors and reducing carbon. Current literature for calculating sectors’ emission effects in China ignore intermediate demand. This might introduce inaccuracy into the analyzed results. To solve this gap, this paper used an alternative input–output method to analyze sectors’ emission effects in China. Firstly, it identifies the key emission sectors and their emission effect characteristics from 2005 to 2017. Then, the reasons for the changes in these sectors’ emission effects are analyzed. Lastly, emission effects were further decomposed so that the driving relationships of emissions among these sectors can be sorted out. The results show that the overall key emission sectors were metal smelting and processing and nonmetal mineral products. The backward-emission-dominant sectors were construction, chemical products, other services (such as finance, health and education), metal products, and so on. The forward-emission-dominant sectors were production and supply of electricity and heat, transportation, storage, postal, and telecommunications services. In 2017, transportation, storage, postal, and telecommunications services’ own final demand emissions and forward emissions accounted for 41.7% and 58.3%, respectively, of this sector’s direct emissions. Moreover, from 2005 to 2017, the main sector emission paths affecting the growth of China’s emissions shifted from manufacturing and construction industries to service industries. Accordingly, strategies for emission reduction, such as substituting pollution inputs, were proposed and analyzed. The research provides an important reference for the Chinese government to adopt appropriate measures to reduce carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongke Yuan & Yixing Wang & Yuanying Chi & Feng Jin, 2020. "Identification of Key Carbon Emission Sectors and Analysis of Emission Effects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8673-:d:431347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonis, Michael & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Martins, Eduardo B., 1995. "Linkages, key sectors and structural change: some new perspectives," MPRA Paper 54754, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Oestreich, A. Marcel & Tsiakas, Ilias, 2015. "Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 294-308.
    3. Qian Zhang & Jun Nakatani & Yuichi Moriguchi, 2015. "Compilation of an Embodied CO 2 Emission Inventory for China Using 135-Sector Input-Output Tables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Liu, Yu & Tan, Xiu-Jie & Yu, Yang & Qi, Shao-Zhou, 2017. "Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China – A CGE-analysis using TermCO2 model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 762-769.
    5. Heimler, Alberto, 1991. "Linkages and Vertical Integration in the Chinese Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(2), pages 261-267, May.
    6. Mu, Yaqian & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2018. "The economic impact of China's INDC: Distinguishing the roles of the renewable energy quota and the carbon market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2955-2966.
    7. Liyin Shen & Yingli Lou & Yali Huang & Jindao Chen, 2018. "A driving–driven perspective on the key carbon emission sectors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 349-371, August.
    8. Xie, Xuan & Shao, Shuai & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Exploring the driving forces and mitigation pathways of CO2 emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry: 1995–2031," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1004-1015.
    9. Mat�as Piaggio & Vicent Alc�ntara & Emilio Padilla, 2014. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions And Economic Structure In Uruguay," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 155-176, June.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Xian, Yujiao & Wang, Ke & Wei, Yi-Ming & Huang, Zhimin, 2019. "Would China’s power industry benefit from nationwide carbon emission permit trading? An optimization model-based ex post analysis on abatement cost savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 978-986.
    12. Alcántara, Vicent & del Río, Pablo & Hernández, Félix, 2010. "Structural analysis of electricity consumption by productive sectors. The Spanish case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2088-2098.
    13. Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Wei Wei & Steven J. Davis & Philippe Ciais & Jin Bai & Shushi Peng & Qiang Zhang & Klaus Hubacek & Gregg Marland & Robert J. Andres & Douglas Crawford-Brown & Jintai Lin & Hongya, 2015. "Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7565), pages 335-338, August.
    14. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zou, Shaohui & Zhang, Jinsuo, 2020. "Intertemporal optimization of the coal production capacity in China in terms of uncertain demand, economy, environment, and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Othman, Jamal & Jafari, Yaghoob, 2013. "Identification of the key sectors producing CO2 emissions in Malaysia: application of Input–Output analysis," MPRA Paper 65192, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Aug 2014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Ying & Yu, Yang & Mardani, Abbas, 2021. "Selection of carbon emissions control industries in China: An approach based on complex networks control perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Longji Zeng & Yuandi Wang & Yajuan Deng, 2022. "How Land Transactions Affect Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Xiaodong Li & Ai Ren & Qi Li, 2022. "Exploring Patterns of Transportation-Related CO 2 Emissions Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vicent Alcántara & Emilio Padilla, 2020. "Key sectors in greenhouse gas emissions in Spain: An alternative input–output analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 577-588, June.
    2. Tan, Xiujie & Sun, Qian & Wang, Meiji & Se Cheong, Tsun & Yan Shum, Wai & Huang, Jinpeng, 2022. "Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    3. Wang, Kai-Hua & Su, Chi-Wei & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona & Umar, Muhammad, 2021. "Whether crude oil dependence and CO2 emissions influence military expenditure in net oil importing countries?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Yidan Chen & Jiang Lin & David Roland-Holst & Xu Liu & Can Wang, 2023. "Declining Renewable Costs, Emissions Trading, and Economic Growth: China’s Power System at the Crossroads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Yu, Zhongjue & Geng, Yong & Calzadilla, Alvaro & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2022. "China's unconventional carbon emissions trading market: The impact of a rate-based cap in the power generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Lu Meng & Jalel Sager, 2017. "Energy Consumption and Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions from China’s Petrochemical Industry Based on an Environmental Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Garbellini, Nadia & Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2014. "Blocks and circularity in labour requirements: An interplay between clusters and subsystems in the EU," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 60-74.
    8. Buenaño, Edwin & Padilla, Emilio & Alcántara, Vicent, 2021. "Relevant sectors in CO2 emissions in Ecuador and implications for mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Mardones, Cristian & Ortega, José, 2021. "Are the emissions trading systems’ simulations generated with a computable general equilibrium model sensitive to the nested production structure?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    10. Liyin Shen & Yingli Lou & Yali Huang & Jindao Chen, 2018. "A driving–driven perspective on the key carbon emission sectors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 349-371, August.
    11. B. Andreosso‐O'Callaghan & G. Yue, 2004. "Intersectoral Linkages and Key Sectors in China, 1987–1997," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 165-183, June.
    12. An, Kangxin & Zhang, Shihui & Huang, Hai & Liu, Yuan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    13. Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Pierre Boulanger & María del Carmen Delgado & Emanuele Ferrari & Robert M'barek, 2012. "An approach to describe the agri-food and other bio-based sectors in the European Union: Focus on Spain," JRC Research Reports JRC72097, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. Giannis Karagiannis & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2010. "Sectoral linkages and industrial efficiency: a dilemma or a requisition in identifying development priorities?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 207-233, August.
    16. Wen, Wen & Feng, Cuiyang & Zhou, Hao & Zhang, Li & Wu, Xiaohui & Qi, Jianchuan & Yang, Xuechun & Liang, Yuhan, 2021. "Critical provincial transmission sectors for carbon dioxide emissions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Lenzen, Manfred, 2003. "Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, March.
    18. Alejandro CARDENETE & Patricia FUENTES SAGUAR & Clemente POLO, 2008. "Energy System and CO2 emissions: a SAM Analysis," EcoMod2008 23800022, EcoMod.
    19. Yu, Fan & Xiao, De & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2021. "The impact of carbon emission trading schemes on urban-rural income inequality in China: A multi-period difference-in-differences method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. M. Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2007. "A Computable General Equilibrium Approach to Hypothetical Extractions and Missing Links," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 710.07, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC), revised 29 Oct 2008.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8673-:d:431347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.