IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8202-d423934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Optimization Model for Estimating In-Situ Production Quantity of PC Members to Minimize Environmental Loads

Author

Listed:
  • Jeeyoung Lim

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, Green BIM Laboratory, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA)

  • Joseph J. Kim

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, Green BIM Laboratory, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA)

Abstract

CO 2 emissions account for 80% of greenhouse gases, which lead to the largest contributions to climate change. As the problem of CO 2 emission becomes more and more prominent, research on sustainable technologies to reduce CO 2 emission among environmental loads is continuously being conducted. In-situ production of precast concrete members has advantages over in-plant production in reducing costs, securing equal or enhanced quality under equal conditions, and reducing CO 2 emission. When applying in-situ production to real projects, it is vital to calculate the optimal quantity. This paper presents a dynamic optimization model for estimating in-situ production quantity of precast concrete members subjected to environmental loads. After defining various factors and deriving the objective function, an optimization model is developed using system dynamics. As a result of optimizing the quantity by applying it to the case project, it was confirmed that the optimal case can save 7557 t-CO 2 in CO 2 emissions and 6,966,000 USD in cost, which resulted in 14.58% and 10.53% for environmental loads and cost, respectively. The model developed here can be used to calculate the quantity of in-situ production quickly and easily in consideration of dynamically changing field conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeeyoung Lim & Joseph J. Kim, 2020. "Dynamic Optimization Model for Estimating In-Situ Production Quantity of PC Members to Minimize Environmental Loads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8202-:d:423934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taehyoung Kim & Chang U. Chae, 2016. "Evaluation Analysis of the CO 2 Emission and Absorption Life Cycle for Precast Concrete in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "Technology and Management for Sustainable Buildings and Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-3, August.
    2. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Jeeyoung Lim & Joseph J. Kim & Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "A Holistic Review of Building Energy Efficiency and Reduction Based on Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joowook Kim & Jemin Myoung & Hyunwoo Lim & Doosam Song, 2020. "Efficiency Gap Caused by the Input Data in Evaluating Energy Efficiency of Low-Income Households’ Energy Retrofit Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Ä°rem Åžanal, 2018. "Discussion on the effectiveness of cement replacement for carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction in concrete," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 366-378, April.
    3. Tomasz Rudnicki, 2022. "The Impact of the Aggregate Used on the Possibility of Reducing the Carbon Footprint in Pavement Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Hong, Taehoon & Jeong, Kwangbok & Koo, Choongwan, 2018. "An optimized gene expression programming model for forecasting the national CO2 emissions in 2030 using the metaheuristic algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 808-820.
    5. Golden Odey & Bashir Adelodun & Sang-Hyun Kim & Kyung-Sook Choi, 2021. "Status of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Case Study of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-30, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8202-:d:423934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.