IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7988-d420312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PET-Bottled Water Consumption in View of a Circular Economy: The Case Study of Salento (South Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Gambino

    (Laboratory of Hygiene, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Francesco Bagordo

    (Laboratory of Hygiene, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Benedetta Coluccia

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce LE, Italy)

  • Tiziana Grassi

    (Laboratory of Hygiene, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Giovanni De Filippis

    (Local Health Authority ASL Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Prisco Piscitelli

    (Local Health Authority ASL Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Biagio Galante

    (Local Health Authority ASL Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Federica De Leo

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce LE, Italy)

Abstract

Polyethylenterephtalate (PET) is the preferred packaging material in the bottled water industry and represents the main cause of waste production. This work investigated the drinking water consumption habits, with particular reference to PET-bottled water, of people living in the province of Lecce (Apulia Region, Southern Italy) by age and geographical groups. Their perception about the quality of tap water was also explored. The survey was performed by the administration of a questionnaire to 4137 citizens. Bottled mineral water was consumed by about the 90.4% of respondents with an average consumption of 387.7 L/year per capita (375.2 L/year in PET-bottles, 12.5 L/year in glass bottles). Public supply system was used by the 61.5% of respondents with an average consumption of 169.4 L/year per capita. The consumption of tap water was negatively related to the perception of its bad quality and the residence in a big city (Lecce); while it was positively associated with the age group ≤ 16 years old. Effective communications strategies must be developed in order to promote the consumption of tap water and implement good practice of circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Gambino & Francesco Bagordo & Benedetta Coluccia & Tiziana Grassi & Giovanni De Filippis & Prisco Piscitelli & Biagio Galante & Federica De Leo, 2020. "PET-Bottled Water Consumption in View of a Circular Economy: The Case Study of Salento (South Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7988-:d:420312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Orset & Nicolas Barret & Aurélien Lemaire, 2017. "How consumers of plastic water bottles are responding to environmental policies?," Post-Print hal-01500900, HAL.
    2. Paul W. Ballantine & Lucie K. Ozanne & Rachel Bayfield, 2019. "Why Buy Free? Exploring Perceptions of Bottled Water Consumption and Its Environmental Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Pier Paolo Miglietta & Pierluigi Toma & Francesco Paolo Fanizzi & Antonella De Donno & Benedetta Coluccia & Danilo Migoni & Francesco Bagordo & Francesca Serio, 2017. "A Grey Water Footprint Assessment of Groundwater Chemical Pollution: Case Study in Salento (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Józef Ober & Janusz Karwot, 2021. "Tap Water Quality: Seasonal User Surveys in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Markus Gall & Andrea Schweighuber & Wolfgang Buchberger & Reinhold W. Lang, 2020. "Plastic Bottle Cap Recycling—Characterization of Recyclate Composition and Opportunities for Design for Circularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Kamali, Ali Reza & Li, Siyuan, 2023. "Molten salt-assisted valorization of waste PET plastics into nanostructured SnO2@terephthalic acid with excellent Li-ion storage performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Arijit Bhattacharya & Shefali Srivastava & Abhijit Majumdar, 2024. "Circular supply chains in manufacturing—Quo vadis? Accomplishments, challenges and future opportunities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4397-4423, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Borusiak & Andrzej Szymkowiak & Bartłomiej Pierański & Katarzyna Szalonka, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Concern on Intention to Reduce Consumption of Single-Use Bottled Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Korey Fennell & Jack Fehlberg & Sukhdeep Singh & Laurent M. Matuana & Sungeun Cho & Eva Almenar, 2024. "Consumers’ Behavior toward Packaging Containing Agricultural Waste as a Plastic Filler for Food: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. M. Lahandi Baskoro & Benny Tjahjono & Macarena Beltran & Anna Bogush & Yichuan Wang, 2024. "The imperative of communication signals in boosting business strategies of the bioplastic packaging industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 307-334, February.
    4. Mkaddem, Chamseddine & Mahjoubi, Soufiane, 2022. "Climate change and its impact on water consumption in Tunisia: Evidence from ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 115658, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2022.
    5. Chen Yue & Yong Qian & Feng Liu & Xiangxiang Cui & Suhua Meng, 2023. "Analysis of Ningxia Hui Autonomous District’s Gray Water Footprint from the Perspective of Water Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Kai Zhang & Shunjie Wang & Shuyu Liu & Kunlun Liu & Jiayu Yan & Xuejia Li, 2022. "Water Environment Quality Evaluation and Pollutant Source Analysis in Tuojiang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Giovanni De Filippis & Prisco Piscitelli & Idelberto Francesco Castorini & Anna Maria Raho & Adele Idolo & Nicola Ungaro & Filomena Lacarbonara & Erminia Sgaramella & Vito Laghezza & Donatella Chionna, 2020. "Water Quality Assessment: A Quali-Quantitative Method for Evaluation of Environmental Pressures Potentially Impacting on Groundwater, Developed under the M.I.N.O.Re. Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Van Asselt, Joanna & Nian, Yefan & Soh, Moonwon & Morgan, Stephen & Gao, Zhifeng, 2022. "Do plastic warning labels reduce consumers' willingness to pay for plastic egg packaging? – Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Martinez-Carrasco Martínez, Laura & Brugarolas Mollá-Bauzá, Margarita & Gascón Mora,Andrea, 2020. "A consumer behaviour approach to analyse the sustainability of food purchasing," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 20(02), December.
    10. Siyu Gao & Bilin Shao, 2022. "Why Do Consumers Switch to Biodegradable Plastic Consumption? The Effect of Push, Pull and Mooring on the Plastic Consumption Intention of Young Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Zapata, Oscar, 2021. "The relationship between climate conditions and consumption of bottled water: A potential link between climate change and plastic pollution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Diego Voccia & Giacomo Mortella & Federico Ferrari & Maria Chiara Fontanella & Marco Trevisan & Lucrezia Lamastra, 2022. "The Anthropic Pressure on the Grey Water Footprint: The Case of the Vulnerable Areas of the Emilia-Romagna Region in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Naoum Tsolakis & Jagjit Singh Srai & Eirini Aivazidou, 2018. "Blue Water Footprint Management in a UK Poultry Supply Chain under Environmental Regulatory Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Farida Saleem, 2021. "Antecedents of the Green Behavioral Intentions of Hotel Guests: A Developing Country Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Rahaf Ajaj & Wisam Abu Jadayil & Hamna Anver & Eman Aqil, 2022. "A Revision for the Different Reuses of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Water Bottles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Lina JovarauskaitÄ— & Audra BalundÄ— & Inga TruskauskaitÄ—-KuneviÄ ienÄ— & Goda KaniuÅ¡onytÄ— & Rita ŽukauskienÄ— & Mykolas Simas PoÅ¡kus, 2020. "Toward Reducing Adolescents’ Bottled Water Purchasing: From Policy Awareness to Policy-Congruent Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    17. Francesca Serio & Lucia Martella & Giovanni Imbriani & Adele Idolo & Francesco Bagordo & Antonella De Donno, 2021. "The Water Safety Plan Approach: Application to Small Drinking-Water Systems—Case Studies in Salento (South Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Maria V. Zwicker & Cameron Brick & Gert-Jan M. Gruter & Frenk van Harreveld, 2021. "(Not) Doing the Right Things for the Wrong Reasons: An Investigation of Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions, and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Based Plastics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Geir Wæhler Gustavsen & Atle Wehn Hegnes, 2020. "Turning the Tap or Buying the Bottle? Consumers’ Personality, Understanding of Risk, Trust and Conspicuous Consumption of Drinking Water in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Gang Liu & Weiqian Wang & Kevin W. Li, 2019. "Water Footprint Allocation under Equity and Efficiency Considerations: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7988-:d:420312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.