IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7657-d414515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning for Conservation Planning in a Changing Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Cristina Mosebo Fernandes

    (Department of Planning, Geography and Surveying, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A.C Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Rebeca Quintero Gonzalez

    (Department of Planning, Geography and Surveying, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A.C Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Marie Ann Lenihan-Clarke

    (Department of Planning, Geography and Surveying, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A.C Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Ezra Francis Leslie Trotter

    (Department of Planning, Geography and Surveying, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A.C Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Jamal Jokar Arsanjani

    (Department of Planning, Geography and Surveying, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A.C Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Wildlife species’ habitats throughout North America are subject to direct and indirect consequences of climate change. Vulnerability assessments for the Intermountain West regard wildlife and vegetation and their disturbance as two key resource areas in terms of ecosystems when considering climate change issues. Despite the adaptability potential of certain wildlife, increased temperature estimates of 1.67–2 °C by 2050 increase the likelihood and severity of droughts, floods, heatwaves and wildfires in Utah. As a consequence, resilient flora and fauna could be displaced. The aim of this study was to locate areas of habitat for an exemplary species, i.e., sage-grouse, based on current climate conditions and pinpoint areas of future habitat based on climate projections. The locations of wildlife were collected from Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) observations in addition to normal temperature and precipitation, vegetation cover and other ecosystem-related data. Four machine learning algorithms were then used to locate the current sites of wildlife habitats and predict suitable future sites where wildlife would likely relocate to, dependent on the effects of climate change and based on a timeframe of scientifically backed temperature-increase estimates. Our findings show that Random Forest outperforms other competing models, with an accuracy of 0.897, and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.917 and 0.885, respectively, and has great potential in Species Distribution Modeling (SDM), which can provide useful insights into habitat predictions. Based on this model, our predictions show that sage-grouse habitats in Utah will continue to decrease over the coming years due to climate change, producing a highly fragmented habitat and causing a loss of close to 70% of their current habitat. Priority Areas of Conservation (PACs) and protected areas might be deemed insufficient to halt this habitat loss, and more effort should be put into maintaining connectivity between patches to ensure the movement and genetic diversity within the sage-grouse population. The underlying data-driven methodical approach of this study could be useful for environmentalists, researchers, decision-makers, and policymakers, among others.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Cristina Mosebo Fernandes & Rebeca Quintero Gonzalez & Marie Ann Lenihan-Clarke & Ezra Francis Leslie Trotter & Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2020. "Machine Learning for Conservation Planning in a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7657-:d:414515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren-Yan Duan & Xiao-Quan Kong & Min-Yi Huang & Wei-Yi Fan & Zhi-Gao Wang, 2014. "The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.
    2. Senait D Senay & Susan P Worner & Takayoshi Ikeda, 2013. "Novel Three-Step Pseudo-Absence Selection Technique for Improved Species Distribution Modelling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leal Filho, Walter & Wall, Tony & Rui Mucova, Serafino Afonso & Nagy, Gustavo J. & Balogun, Abdul-Lateef & Luetz, Johannes M. & Ng, Artie W. & Kovaleva, Marina & Safiul Azam, Fardous Mohammad & Alves,, 2022. "Deploying artificial intelligence for climate change adaptation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Iturbide, Maialen & Bedia, Joaquín & Herrera, Sixto & del Hierro, Oscar & Pinto, Miriam & Gutiérrez, Jose Manuel, 2015. "A framework for species distribution modelling with improved pseudo-absence generation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 166-174.
    3. Lu, Yongquan & Liu, Guilin & Xian, Yuyang & Tang, Jiaqi & Zhong, Liming, 2024. "Climate change brings both opportunities and challenges to rural revitalization in China: Evidence from apple geographical indication predictions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    5. Wentao Yang & Huaxi He & Dongsheng Wei & Hao Chen, 2022. "Generating pseudo-absence samples of invasive species based on outlier detection in the geographical characteristic space," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 261-279, April.
    6. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    7. An T. N. Dang & Lalit Kumar & Michael Reid, 2020. "Modelling the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Cultivation in Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Pecchi, Matteo & Marchi, Maurizio & Burton, Vanessa & Giannetti, Francesca & Moriondo, Marco & Bernetti, Iacopo & Bindi, Marco & Chirici, Gherardo, 2019. "Species distribution modelling to support forest management. A literature review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    9. Jan Altman & Kerstin Treydte & Vit Pejcha & Tomas Cerny & Petr Petrik & Miroslav Srutek & Jong-Suk Song & Valerie Trouet & Jiri Dolezal, 2020. "Tree growth response to recent warming of two endemic species in Northeast Asia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1345-1364, October.
    10. Huayong Zhang & Shuang Zheng & Tousheng Huang & Jiangnan Liu & Junjie Yue, 2023. "Estimation of Potential Suitable Habitats for the Relict Plant Euptelea pleiosperma in China via Comparison of Three Niche Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Karen E DeMatteo & Miguel A Rinas & Juan Pablo Zurano & Nicole Selleski & Rosio G Schneider & Carina F Argüelles, 2017. "Using niche-modelling and species-specific cost analyses to determine a multispecies corridor in a fragmented landscape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Whitford, Anna M. & Shipley, Benjamin R. & McGuire, Jenny L., 2024. "The influence of the number and distribution of background points in presence-background species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7657-:d:414515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.