IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7431-d411368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of a Real Call for Research Projects as Activity to Acquire Research Skills: Perception Analysis of Teacher Candidates

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Rodríguez-Martín

    (Technological Department, Catholic University of Avila (UCAV), Canteros, 05005 Ávila, Spain
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Av. Fernando Ballesteros, 0, 37700 Béjar, Salamanca, Spain)

  • Diego Vergara

    (Technological Department, Catholic University of Avila (UCAV), Canteros, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez

    (Department of Cartographic and Land Engineering, University of Salamanca, University of León, Avda, Astorga, 24401 Ponferrada, Spain)

Abstract

In this research, a novel methodology based on the simulation of a call for research projects was applied for the training of STEM secondary school teachers, with results raised and analyzed to determine the response of the students to this new methodology. The activity was applied in the same course during two academic years with student groups from very different teaching specialties such as mathematics, physics and chemistry, biology and geology, technology and health processes who were studying the Master’s Degree in Secondary Education, specifically, the 3 European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) course of Initiation to Educational Research (IER), this Master’s course being mandatory for working as a secondary professor. The Master’s students are asked to write their own research project proposals for a fictitious call on a topic freely chosen by them, which might have been related to the research line of the final Master’s thesis. In it, they had to propose all the contents studied in the course (such as writing a brief state of the art, establishing a research team, setting objectives, a description of the methodology for educational research, instruments, a plan for the dissemination of the results, the needed resources, etc.). The students’ perceptions of the usefulness and reality of what they had learned for their professional development and for writing their final theses were assessed. The results based on the perceptions of the students demonstrate that the activity had been useful for assimilating concepts related to educational research in the context of secondary education (research skills), which will be useful for improving the critical sense of the students (teacher candidates) and for their professional future in the context of applied research in day-to-day secondary teacher activities. Furthermore, the results show the activity was useful for the development of the final Master’s thesis. The difficult aspects that the activity presented for them were analyzed. The results were statistically compared for the students of the different specialties, deducing, in all cases, a homogeneous good acceptance with slight differences between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Rodríguez-Martín & Diego Vergara & Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, 2020. "Simulation of a Real Call for Research Projects as Activity to Acquire Research Skills: Perception Analysis of Teacher Candidates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7431-:d:411368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fátima Poza-Vilches & Abigail López-Alcarria & Nerea Mazuecos-Ciarra, 2019. "A Professional Competences’ Diagnosis in Education for Sustainability: A Case Study from the Standpoint of the Education Guidance Service (EGS) in the Spanish Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Romero-Gutierrez, Miguel & Jimenez-Liso, M. Rut & Martinez-Chico, Maria, 2016. "SWOT analysis to evaluate the programme of a joint online/onsite master's degree in environmental education through the students’ perceptions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anuar R. Giménez & Jesús Martín-Vaquero & Manuel Rodríguez-Martín, 2022. "Analysis of Industrial Engineering Students’ Perception after a Multiple Integrals-Based Activity with a Fourth-Year Student," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrique Carmona-Medeiro & José María Cardeñoso Domingo, 2021. "Social Interaction: A Crucial Means to Promote Sustainability in Initial Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Katerina Kabassi, 2021. "Comparing Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models for Evaluating Environmental Education Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2022. "Sustainable Development Competences of Engineering Students in Light of the Industry 5.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Figen Akça, 2019. "Sustainable Development in Teacher Education in Terms of Being Solution Oriented and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Ramón Martínez-Medina & José C. Arrebola, 2019. "Analysis of Sustainability Activities in Spanish Elementary Education Textbooks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Katerina Kabassi & Anastasia Papadaki & Athanasios Botonis, 2023. "Adapting Recommendations on Environmental Education Programs," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Arturo Realyvásquez-Vargas & Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías & Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Teresa Carrillo-Gutiérrez & Guadalupe Hernández-Escobedo, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Factors on Academic Performance of University Students Taking Online Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Herlambang Herlambang & Amelia Dwi Fitri & Amirul Mukminin & Muhaimin Muhaimin & Marzul Hidayat & Elfiani Elfiani & Nyimas Natasha Ayu Shafira & Anggelia Puspasari & Susan Tarawifa & Ahmad Abdun Salam, 2021. "Quality Assurance for Sustainable Higher Education: Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Julia Lohmann & Jennifer Breithecker & Ulrike Ohl & Petra Gieß-Stüber & Hans Peter Brandl-Bredenbeck, 2021. "Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of Physical Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Ana Alexandra Gora & Simona Cătălina Ștefan & Ștefan Cătălin Popa & Cătălina Florentina Albu, 2019. "Students’ Perspective on Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Context of Sustainability: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Miguel Angel Pena-Cerezo & Miren Artaraz-Minon & Jorge Tejedor-Nunez, 2019. "Analysis of the Consciousness of University Undergraduates for Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna & Matylda Bojar, 2021. "Structure of Competences of Lublin University of Technology Students in the Field of Sustainable Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 394-404.
    13. María de Fátima Poza-Vilches & José Gutiérrez-Pérez & María Teresa Pozo-Llorente, 2020. "Quality Criteria to Evaluate Performance and Scope of 2030 Agenda in Metropolitan Areas: Case Study on Strategic Planning of Environmental Municipality Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7431-:d:411368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.