IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7265-d409056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Market Model with Social and Commercial Tiers for Improved Prosumer Trading in Microgrids

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan-Constantin Neagu

    (Department of Power Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Ovidiu Ivanov

    (Department of Power Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Gheorghe Grigoras

    (Department of Power Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Mihai Gavrilas

    (Department of Power Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Dumitru-Marcel Istrate

    (Department of Power Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

In the deregulated electricity markets, trading prices are determined by the offer-demand mechanism, and retail consumers can negotiate tariffs with their supplier of choice. For classic wholesale suppliers, the tariffs are determined by the prices of transactions performed on the wholesale market. In parallel with becoming eligible for participating in the market, the consumers use increasingly local generation sources based mostly on renewable electricity generation equipment such as Photovoltaic (PV) panels, and become prosumers. They want to be able to sell back to the market the generation surplus, in order to obtain the maximum benefits from their initial investment. This paper proposes a two-tier local market model oriented for prosumers and consumers connected in microgrids, based on the blockchain technologies and other technologies and concepts such as smart grids, crowdsourcing and energy poverty. Its goals are to improve the possibilities of local prosumers to sell electricity to local consumers and to increase their profitability, compared to the trading model often used in developing markets, of selling the surplus back to the grid via aggregators. The research aims to contribute to the sustainable development of the electricity sector using new and renewable sources of energy, state-of the art technologies and smart contracts, leading to prosumer proliferation and electricity cost reduction for consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan-Constantin Neagu & Ovidiu Ivanov & Gheorghe Grigoras & Mihai Gavrilas & Dumitru-Marcel Istrate, 2020. "New Market Model with Social and Commercial Tiers for Improved Prosumer Trading in Microgrids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-43, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7265-:d:409056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Fu & Zhiyu Xu & Ning Wang & Xiaoyu Lyu & Weisheng Xu, 2020. "“Peer-to-Peer Plus” Electricity Transaction within Community of Active Energy Agents Regarding Distribution Network Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Ferruzzi, Gabriella & Cervone, Guido & Delle Monache, Luca & Graditi, Giorgio & Jacobone, Francesca, 2016. "Optimal bidding in a Day-Ahead energy market for Micro Grid under uncertainty in renewable energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 194-202.
    3. Caroline Kuzemko & Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson, 2019. "New directions in the international political economy of energy," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Neves, Diana & Scott, Ian & Silva, Carlos A., 2020. "Peer-to-peer energy trading potential: An assessment for the residential sector under different technology and tariff availabilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Christie Etukudor & Benoit Couraud & Valentin Robu & Wolf-Gerrit Früh & David Flynn & Chinonso Okereke, 2020. "Automated Negotiation for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Adamu Sani Yahaya & Nadeem Javaid & Fahad A. Alzahrani & Amjad Rehman & Ibrar Ullah & Affaf Shahid & Muhammad Shafiq, 2020. "Blockchain Based Sustainable Local Energy Trading Considering Home Energy Management and Demurrage Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Mohsen Khorasany & Donald Azuatalam & Robert Glasgow & Ariel Liebman & Reza Razzaghi, 2020. "Transactive Energy Market for Energy Management in Microgrids: The Monash Microgrid Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Hui Huang & Shilin Nie & Jin Lin & Yuanyuan Wang & Jun Dong, 2020. "Optimization of Peer-to-Peer Power Trading in a Microgrid with Distributed PV and Battery Energy Storage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Alexandru Maxim & Costică Mihai & Constantin-Marius Apostoaie & Cristian Popescu & Costel Istrate & Ionel Bostan, 2016. "Implications and Measurement of Energy Poverty across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Ye-Byoul Son & Jong-Hyuk Im & Hee-Yong Kwon & Seong-Yun Jeon & Mun-Kyu Lee, 2020. "Privacy-Preserving Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grids Using Functional Encryption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2016. "Prosumer bidding and scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 828-843.
    12. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    13. Yu Min Hwang & Issac Sim & Young Ghyu Sun & Heung-Jae Lee & Jin Young Kim, 2018. "Game-Theory Modeling for Social Welfare Maximization in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Sara Haghifam & Kazem Zare & Mehdi Abapour & Gregorio Muñoz-Delgado & Javier Contreras, 2020. "A Stackelberg Game-Based Approach for Transactive Energy Management in Smart Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-34, July.
    15. Chiara Candelise & Gianluca Ruggieri, 2020. "Status and Evolution of the Community Energy Sector in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Manuela Unguru, 2018. "Blockchain Technology: Opportunities For The Energy Sector," Euroinfo, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 2(1), pages 53-58, January.
    17. Cornélusse, Bertrand & Savelli, Iacopo & Paoletti, Simone & Giannitrapani, Antonio & Vicino, Antonio, 2019. "A community microgrid architecture with an internal local market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 547-560.
    18. Bertrand Corn'elusse & Iacopo Savelli & Simone Paoletti & Antonio Giannitrapani & Antonio Vicino, 2018. "A Community Microgrid Architecture with an Internal Local Market," Papers 1810.09803, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    19. Jay Sterling Gregg & Sophie Nyborg & Meiken Hansen & Valeria Jana Schwanitz & August Wierling & Jan Pedro Zeiss & Sarah Delvaux & Victor Saenz & Lucia Polo-Alvarez & Chiara Candelise & Winston Gilcrea, 2020. "Collective Action and Social Innovation in the Energy Sector: A Mobilization Model Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, February.
    20. van Leeuwen, Gijs & AlSkaif, Tarek & Gibescu, Madeleine & van Sark, Wilfried, 2020. "An integrated blockchain-based energy management platform with bilateral trading for microgrid communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rami David Orejon-Sanchez & Jose Ramon Andres-Diaz & Alfonso Gago-Calderon, 2021. "Autonomous Photovoltaic LED Urban Street Lighting: Technical, Economic, and Social Viability Analysis Based on a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Karolina Mucha-Kuś & Maciej Sołtysik & Krzysztof Zamasz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna, 2021. "Coopetitive Nature of Energy Communities—The Energy Transition Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Mehdi Montakhabi & Ine Van Zeeland & Pieter Ballon, 2022. "Barriers for Prosumers’ Open Business Models: A Resource-Based View on Assets and Data-Sharing in Electricity Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Manuel Casquiço & Bruno Mataloto & Joao C. Ferreira & Vitor Monteiro & Joao L. Afonso & Jose A. Afonso, 2021. "Blockchain and Internet of Things for Electrical Energy Decentralization: A Review and System Architecture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Jakub Jasiński & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Maciej Sołtysik, 2021. "Determinants of Energy Cooperatives’ Development in Rural Areas—Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Manuel Casquiço & Bruno Mataloto & Joao C. Ferreira & Vitor Monteiro & Joao L. Afonso & Jose A. Afonso, 2021. "Blockchain and Internet of Things for Electrical Energy Decentralization: A Review and System Architecture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Dudjak, Viktorija & Neves, Diana & Alskaif, Tarek & Khadem, Shafi & Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Saggese, Pietro & Bowler, Benjamin & Andoni, Merlinda & Bertolini, Marina & Zhou, Yue & Lormeteau, Blanche &, 2021. "Impact of local energy markets integration in power systems layer: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2021. "Toward sustainable microgrids with blockchain technology-based peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism: A fuzzy meta-heuristic approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Yildizbasi, Abdullah, 2021. "Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 183-197.
    7. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Alaa A. F. Husain & Maryam Huda Ahmad Phesal & Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir & Ungku Anisa Ungku Amirulddin & Abdulhadi H. J. Junaidi, 2021. "A Decade of Transitioning Malaysia toward a High-Solar PV Energy Penetration Nation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Carlos Oliveira & Micael Simões & Leonardo Bitencourt & Tiago Soares & Manuel A. Matos, 2023. "Distributed Network-Constrained P2P Community-Based Market for Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Javier Parra-Domínguez & Esteban Sánchez & Ángel Ordóñez, 2023. "The Prosumer: A Systematic Review of the New Paradigm in Energy and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-44, July.
    12. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Sara Haghifam & Kazem Zare & Mehdi Abapour & Gregorio Muñoz-Delgado & Javier Contreras, 2020. "A Stackelberg Game-Based Approach for Transactive Energy Management in Smart Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-34, July.
    14. Younes Zahraoui & Tarmo Korõtko & Argo Rosin & Hannes Agabus, 2023. "Market Mechanisms and Trading in Microgrid Local Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-52, February.
    15. Kirli, Desen & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Salgado-Bravo, Marcelo & Norbu, Sonam & Andoni, Merlinda & Antonopoulos, Ioannis & Negrete-Pincetic, Matias & Flynn, David & Kiprakis, Aristides, 2022. "Smart contracts in energy systems: A systematic review of fundamental approaches and implementations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Rodrigues, Stefane Dias & Garcia, Vinicius Jacques, 2023. "Transactive energy in microgrid communities: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Tsaousoglou, Georgios & Giraldo, Juan S. & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2022. "Market Mechanisms for Local Electricity Markets: A review of models, solution concepts and algorithmic techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Roth, Tamara & Utz, Manuel & Baumgarte, Felix & Rieger, Alexander & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Strüker, Jens, 2022. "Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    19. Koo-Hyung Chung & Don Hur, 2020. "Towards the Design of P2P Energy Trading Scheme Based on Optimal Energy Scheduling for Prosumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Rogério Rocha & Ricardo Silva & João Mello & Sérgio Faria & Fábio Retorta & Clara Gouveia & José Villar, 2023. "A Three-Stage Model to Manage Energy Communities, Share Benefits and Provide Local Grid Services," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7265-:d:409056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.