IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6793-d402201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Balanced Scorecard as a Tool Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Chinese Emerging Family Farms—Evidence from Jilin Province in China

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Chen

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xinglong Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Nicola Shadbolt

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to apply the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) concept to the sustainable performance evaluation of emerging family farms in Jilin, China. A sustainable performance evaluation system was constructed based on the BSC. A questionnaire survey was used with a sample of 156 emerging family farms involved in the production of planting (grain, horticultural crops) and breeding (animal products) enterprises in Jilin, China. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (FCE) was used for the sustainable performance evaluation by different BSC dimensions, farm types, and regions. This empirical study revealed that the BSC is applicable for the farm sustainable performance evaluation in the Chinese context. The key is selecting suitable indicators for the evaluation index system while considering the particularity of market, resources, management, and personnel. The sustainable performance of the investigated family farms is in the slightly above moderate level as a whole. Financial performance and market performance are above moderate, while internal business process performance is moderate, and learning and growth performance is below moderate. They are facing difficult challenges to upgrade in terms of marketing and financing channels, branding, and organic production. Industrial differences existed in the farms’ sustainable performance. Farms combining planting and breeding have better sustainability, which could be a signal for transformation of the traditional single planting or breeding modes in China. The internal business process performance of grain farms is significantly less, due possibly to long-term policy support and protection with less of an emphasis on ecological outcomes. Subtle regional differences in the overall sustainable performance of surveyed family farms suggest that farm performance depends more on management than on external environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Chen & Xinglong Yang & Nicola Shadbolt, 2020. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Tool Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Chinese Emerging Family Farms—Evidence from Jilin Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6793-:d:402201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paustian, Margit & Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Arable Farming," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206237, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    2. Paustian, Margit & Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Arable Farming," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Philip Brown, 2019. "Gender, Educational Attainment, and Farm Outcomes in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Kalirajan, K. P. & Shand, R. T., 2001. "Technology and farm performance: paths of productive efficiencies over time," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 297-306, March.
    5. Yang, Huan & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2014. "Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 115-125.
    6. Andersson, Per, 2002. "Competence Development Program for the Farmer with Reference to Life as Well as Business," 13th Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002 7007, International Farm Management Association.
    7. Kirtti Ranjan Paltasingh & Phanindra Goyari, 2018. "Impact of farmer education on farm productivity under varying technologies: case of paddy growers in India," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Hota, Pradeep Kumar & Mitra, Sumit & Qureshi, Israr, 2019. "Adopting Bricolage to Overcome Resource Constraints: The Case of Social Enterprises in Rural India," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 371-402, June.
    9. Souza Filho, Hildo Meirelles de & Lourenzani, Wagner Luiz & Queiroz, Timoteo Ramos, 2005. "Strategic Mapping of the Rural Firm: A Balanced Scorecard Approach," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24263, International Farm Management Association.
    10. Lissitsa, Alexej, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard Implementation in Farm Enterprise - A Case Study from Ukraine," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24272, International Farm Management Association.
    11. Graeub, Benjamin E. & Chappell, M. Jahi & Wittman, Hannah & Ledermann, Samuel & Kerr, Rachel Bezner & Gemmill-Herren, Barbara, 2016. "The State of Family Farms in the World," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Shadbolt, Nicola M. & Beeby, N. & Brier, B. & Gardner, John W.G., 2003. "A Critique of the Use of the Balanced Scorecard in Multi-Enterprise Family Farm Businesses," 14th Congress, Perth, Western Australia, August 10-15, 2003 24380, International Farm Management Association.
    13. Kent Olson, 2013. "Trends, issues, threats, and opportunities affecting farmers," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(4), pages 148-167, December.
    14. Yinsheng Yang & Qianwei Zhuang & Guangdong Tian & Silin Wei, 2018. "A Management and Environmental Performance Evaluation of China’s Family Farms Using an Ultimate Comprehensive Cross-Efficiency Model (UCCE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Phanhpakit ONPHANHDALA, 2009. "Farmer Education and Agricultural Efficiency: Evidence from Lao PDR," GSICS Working Paper Series 20, Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, Kobe University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fengxia Yang & Zulin Zhang & Zijun Li & Bingjun Han & Keqiang Zhang & Peng Yang & Yongzhen Ding, 2022. "Prevalence of High-Risk β-Lactam Resistance Genes in Family Livestock Farms in Danjiangkou Reservoir Basin, Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paustian, Margit & Schlosser, Katharina & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "Strategische Planung Und Kontrolle Von Milchviehbetrieben Mit Der Balanced Scorecard," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209194, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Paustian, Margit & Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Arable Farming," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206237, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Paustian, Margit & Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Arable Farming," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Danilo Gambelli & Francesco Solfanelli & Stefano Orsini & Raffaele Zanoli, 2021. "Measuring the Economic Performance of Small Ruminant Farms Using Balanced Scorecard and Importance-Performance Analysis: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne & Pisaniello, John & Buss, Peter & Mayer, Wolfgang, 2021. "The importance of accounting-integrated information systems for realising productivity and sustainability in the agricultural sector," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Luis Bauluz & Yajna Govind & Filip Novokmet, 2020. "Global Land Inequality," PSE Working Papers halshs-03022318, HAL.
    7. Guy Nkamleu, 2004. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in African Agriculture," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 16(1), pages 203-222.
    8. Micheels, Eric T., 2014. "Experience and learning in beef production: Results from a cluster analysis," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(3), pages 1-10.
    9. Tanimonure, Victoria Adeyemi, 2021. "Impact of Climate Adaptation Strategies on the Net Farm Revenue of Underutilized Indigenous Vegetables’ (UIVs) Production in Southwest Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315903, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Akoko, Peter Obuon & Gathungu, Edith & De Groote, Hugo, 2024. "Evaluating Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Maize Dryers in Njoro Sub-County, Nakuru, Kenya," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344279, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    11. Torres Franco, Nicolás Arturo & Dávalos, Eleonora & Morales, Leonardo Fabio, 2021. "Heterogeneous Effects of Agricultural Technical Assistance in Colombia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 459-481, November.
    12. Ayanda Nyambali & Mthunzi Mndela & Tlou Julius Tjelele & Cletos Mapiye & Phillip Evert Strydom & Emiliano Raffrenato & Kennedy Dzama & Voster Muchenje & Ntuthuko Raphael Mkhize, 2022. "Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Nguni Cattle Fed Diets Containing Graded Levels of Opuntia ficus-indica," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Anne Jerneck, 2018. "What about Gender in Climate Change? Twelve Feminist Lessons from Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Viviany Moura Chaves & Cecília Rocha & Sávio Marcelino Gomes & Michelle Cristine Medeiros Jacob & João Bosco Araújo da Costa, 2023. "Integrating Family Farming into School Feeding: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Herrera, Gabriel Paes & Lourival, Reinaldo & da Costa, Reginaldo Brito & Mendes, Dany Rafael Fonseca & Moreira, Tito Belchior Silva & de Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto & Constantino, Michel, 2018. "Econometric analysis of income, productivity and diversification among smallholders in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 455-459.
    16. Zhaohong Wu & Wenyuan Hua & Liangguo Luo & Katsuya Tanaka, 2022. "Technical Efficiency of Maize Production and Its Influencing Factors in the World’s Largest Groundwater Drop Funnel Area, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Delmond, Anthony R. & Ahmed, Haseeb, 2021. "Optimal Antimicrobial Use under Countervailing Externalities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(3), September.
    18. Nwoye, Ifeanyi Innocent & Ezeoke, Francisca Chinwendu & Azodo, Lawretta Ngozi, 2022. "Adoption Of Improved Management Practices Among Abattoir Workers In Dunukofia Local Government Area Of Anambra State, Nigeria," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(3), June.
    19. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    20. Aurélie Cardona & Cristiana Carusi & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 2021. "Engaged Intermediaries to Bridge the Gap between Scientists, Educational Practitioners and Farmers to Develop Sustainable Agri-Food Innovation Systems: A US Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6793-:d:402201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.